Senate finally offers budget, but expect further stalemate
March 27, 2013 12:00 AM | 1078 views | 0 0 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The U.S. Congress has what is called “regular order,” meaning that the lawmaking process follows well-defined written procedures. It requires the president to submit the following year’s budget by the first Monday in February, and then the House and Senate budget committees submit budgets of their own. A House-Senate conference committee then agrees on a compromise and submits it to both houses of Congress in the form of a resolution, one that is technically nonbinding but that greatly influences how federal spending is arrived at.

President Barack Obama has yet to submit his budget. The White House says it may be sent to Congress the week of April 8, more than two months late.

Last week, the House passed its budget resolution, the work of Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, the 2012 GOP vice presidential candidate. Basically, the budget is a reworking of earlier Ryan budgets. It promises to balance the budget in 10 years instead of 20, as in the previous document, through massive cuts in federal spending. And it would replace Medicare with a voucher system.

Ryan boasted that this was the third consecutive year the House had passed a budget on time, a dig at the Democratic-controlled Senate that hadn’t passed a budget at all in four years.

Just before dawn on Saturday, the Democrat-controlled Senate narrowly passed a budget resolution, 50-49, calling for $3.7 trillion in spending next year and — surprise, surprise — $975 billion in tax increases over the decade. The budget calls for modest cuts in defense, farm subsidies and some health programs, but those savings would go to finance repeal of the $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts over 10 years, the “sequestration” that Congress got itself locked into at the insistence of Obama.

The budget — the handiwork of Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-Wash.) — would shield most of the programs that her House counterpart would like to cut. It would not balance the budget; instead, it would reduce the annual deficit — projected at $900 billion for 2013 — to $566 billion in 10 years.

The two budgets are so far apart that Senate Leader Harry Reid said he sees little reason to send them to a conference committee.

The next move is Obama’s budget, in a process that has become neither regular nor orderly.

Can you say “stalemate”?
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides