Scott: Sequester spending cuts could spur heavy job losses
by Jon Gillooly
February 21, 2013 12:47 AM | 4707 views | 7 7 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rep. David Scott (D-Smyrna)
Rep. David Scott (D-Smyrna)
U.S. Rep. David Scott (D-South Cobb) called for bipartisan compromise to avoid the March 1 automatic spending cuts he said could cost hundreds of Lockheed Martin jobs, and teaching and first-responder jobs.

The $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts known as the sequester will occur this year unless Congress acts, with another $1.1 trillion in cuts over the next decade.

Scott said there is still a chance that a compromise could be reached between Democrats and Republicans to avoid the cuts.

“This would be a human tragedy of soaring magnitude,” he said. “We’ve got to look at it in human terms. This will cost jobs. Our first responders, people that protect us, people that teach our children, our Armed Forces.”

Alternatives to the sequester include closing tax loopholes, he said.

“For example, the oil and gas subsidies that should have been closed, that would bring in over $100 billion right there,” he said. “From the corporate jets to some of the expensive kinds of deductions that are held there, that would bring in additional revenue. There’s also the Buffett Rule … but it would require tax reform in terms of closing certain loopholes. These are some things that both Democrats and Republicans have agreed upon that we could look at.”

U.S. Rep. Tom Price (R-Roswell) said Republicans are happy to discuss such things “in the sphere of tax reform” as long as they don’t raise taxes.

“To raise taxes on people so that we can chase ever-increasing spending is a prescription for financial calamity,” Price said. “To close loopholes and deductions and credits on individuals so that we can positively reform our tax code and decrease the rates on everybody and broaden the base and make it so we can get some economic vitality out there, that’s exactly what we ought to be doing.”

Scott said Lockheed has already “suffered tremendous loss” in jobs, as has the economy that depends on Lockheed.

“Those businesses that rely on those employees coming in to that area,” Scott said. “It would be devastating to the Cobb economy, and it could mean as much as maybe 800, 900 jobs immediately. It just depends.”

Lockheed Martin spokeswoman Jennifer Allen said the automatic cuts threaten to weaken virtually all government programs and operations, damage national security, and adversely affect the defense industry.

“Until sequestration is permanently eliminated, there will be an overhang on our industry that stifles investment in plants, equipment, people, and future research and development essential to the future health of our industry,” Allen said. “At this time, we do not know how sequestration will affect any individual program or facility. We will continue to work with our government leaders to find a more effective solution to our nation’s fiscal challenges.”

Searching for middle ground

Scott said there are Republicans who are willing to meet Democrats halfway in negotiations over avoiding the sequester.

“There are areas where we can go without raising taxes, there are loopholes we can close, there are different things we can do, but every time you get a group that’s willing to sit down and do that, then the extreme end of the Republican Party just makes it very difficult,” he said. “All you have to do is look at our own senior senator, Saxby Chambliss, who has tried.”

Yet Price said House Democrats have taken no action in the way of specific spending reductions, nor has the Democratic-controlled Senate.

“The president has done nothing other than give a speech,” Price said.

By contrast, Price said House Republicans have adopted on two occasions over the last year legislation that would reprioritize the spending reductions to kick-start the economy.

“The senate has responded with nothing, and the president has responded with his patented political speech,” Price said.

Playing ‘Chicken Little’

As for Lockheed, the sequester may have an effect on it or it may not, Price said.

“The president has been Chicken Little, running around telling how the world’s going to end if all of this occurs,” Price said. “The fact of the matter is if any reductions occur in any line of production or in any specific area of national security that would harm the nation, that would be because the president wants them to occur.”

Obama has the latitude to determine exactly where the spending reductions could occur, Price said.

“He could just as easily have them occur out of accounts that once again are bloated as opposed to those that are required for our national security,” Price said.

Price said the first $85 billion cut would come out of $3.6 trillion in spending.

“So what we’re doing is decreasing our federal spending for one fiscal year of $3.6 trillion by $85 billion,” he said. “If we can’t find that then clearly, we’re never going to be able to get our fiscal house in order.”

Most of the communication Price said he gets from constituents urges him to ensure the spending reductions occur.

“Now they understand that across-the-board cuts are not the wisest way to do it, but if that’s the only way for us to get Washington spending at least minimally under control, then they’re all in favor of it,” he said.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
D.G. in Clarkdale
February 22, 2013
Too bad sequester doesn't include substantial pay and benefit cuts for inept politicians like David Scott. His rhetoric is in lockstep with an inept administration, one that stays busy with its constant campaigning for "flavor of the month" progressive-liberal causes and panicky overblown emergencies to distract an "attention deficit disorder electorate". Leadership is lacking all around in Washington but it sure seems the Democrats have a lock on leading the perpetual stupid/low information voter factions. When will American voters realize that we are in a serious crisis with our national debt and something must be done immediately? A debt created by both democrats and republicans but under Obama has exploded to grossly irresponsible levels. I won't lie to you, there will be pain involved but look at it as necessary surgery to keep our ailing nation alive and begin curing it from the cancer of debt....
February 22, 2013
So what if some people will get some furlough days, we need to cut spending and get our financial house in order. Obviously the Dems do not want to be proactive
Kennesaw Resident
February 21, 2013
More fearmongering by Democrats, when they agreed to this. I am fine with the sequester.

The federal budget absolutely needs to be cut and as far as defense cuts, this may force us to become less interventionist - something I support.

The Libertarian wing of the Republican Party is probably not too bothered by this at all. I'm not.
February 21, 2013
David you might want to look at FOX News once in a while watching the state controlled media news doesn’t cut it. David’s never paid Lockheed or its employees much attention at all. The stupid Republicans need to get rid of the IRS and go to a flat tax like New Zealand has stop all the write off games there in the bag also for big business and the government . Everybody needs to pay taxes even the Crackheads and Methheads national sales tax and the government needs to live within that budget rate of national GDP!! Tom Price has always been very proactive and helped a lot of Lockheed Martin employees and is in touch with the real world!!
February 22, 2013
Why do Lockheed Martin and other defense contractors deserve the continued government subsidy they've enjoyed for decades? Bottom line, their lifelines to billions of taxpayer dollars should've been squeezed long ago. It doesn't hurt this nation's defenses to dissolve the cozy relationships between the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex.

Little children
February 21, 2013
Both parties are acting like spoiled children in a sand box. They need to close the loophole that they mentioned in this article and Republics need to stop protecting big businesses like the oil companies. In addition, we have business and politicians who owe the IRS millions so they need to collect. Overhaul the welfare and food stamp system and stop free breakfast and lunch at schools. People can feed their own children. They already raised taxes on the rich so now get rid of loopholes. My son just did his taxes and received more money back than he paid in taxes. That has to stop right now. Why should someone receive more money than they paid? Don't give me garbage about how it spurs the economy wither. Get it together!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides