Ehrhart: Ban gifts to every state official
by Jon Gillooly
January 13, 2013 03:27 AM | 7374 views | 4 4 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
State Rep. Earl Ehrhart (R-Powder Springs)
State Rep. Earl Ehrhart (R-Powder Springs)
slideshow
ATLANTA — As the Georgia General Assembly gears up to address the issue of gifts from lobbyists, state Rep. Earl Ehrhart (R-Powder Springs) said he has a few restrictions he would like to add.

A ban on lobbyist gifts should not be limited to state lawmakers, he said.

What irks the Powder Springs Republican about the current debate on government transparency is a failure to recognize how far the Georgia Legislature has come from when he was first elected in 1988.

“When I first got there, the Henry Grady Hotel was just winding down,” he said. “That was the hangout where everybody — legislators, press, lobbyists — that was ‘Sodom on Peachtree.’ Deals. Hookers. It was all there. It was a whole different world.”

Until Republicans took over the House, there were few ethics laws in place, Ehrhart said.

“I’m thrilled with transparency and disclosure,” he said. “What I don’t like about this current push is the specificity on the legislative branch of government. I would submit that in the scheme of transparency and disclosures, the state legislative members have a significant amount more than any other elected official, county commissioner — you cover all these, cities. There’s no scrutiny there.”

For example, Ehrhart said he loves the irony of Common Cause Georgia, a nonpartisan lobbying group, having attorney Emmet Bondurant on its board.

“His firm probably gives more money to the judges in their races that his firm practices in front of — that’s a scandal out there. You want to talk about a conflict of interest, go look at how many lawyers and law firms give to the judges they practice in front of,” Ehrhart said.

Lobbying influence extends to other arenas as well, he said.

“Go stand outside the (Georgia Municipal Association) convention in Savannah, and stand in the hotel about 5:45 before dinner and watch whole city councils come and all the little vendors are in there getting ready to take them to dinner at every restaurant. None of that’s disclosed,” he said.

Ehrhart said he would provide an amendment to any bill that comes before the House this session addressing gifts to legislators.

“If you live in a community and you ride with somebody that makes a decision in the health department, they need to disclose the gas that they spent on you,” he said. “If we’re going to say my soul can be bought, we’re going to go across the board. If transparency is good for this goose, there’s a heck of a lot of gander.”

Another topic expected to come up in the legislature this year is that of the hospital provider fee renewal.

Ehrhart said he’s willing to negotiate on that one if the hospitals will agree to do away with the “competition-stifling, monopoly-creating” regulation known as “Certificate of Need.”

“Every time one of the big hospitals (wants to expand), all the other ones make them spend three years and a $100 million on lawyers to be able to open some new center,” Ehrhart said. “Supposedly the concept behind CON is that you have to ration the health care and there would be too much and nobody would do it. Let the market decide it. If you want me to vote for this bed tax, get rid of CON. It’s a way to stifle competition. It gives you a great monopoly.”

Another area Cobb legislators are targeting this year is a method for collecting sales taxes.

On Tuesday, the Cobb Board of Commissioners voted 5-0 to adopt a resolution requesting legislative action to permit a special purpose local option sales tax at a fraction of a percent.

State Sen. Judson Hill (R-east Cobb) cosponsored legislation for a fractional SPLOST last year, but it was never approved. Hill said he plans to try again this session. From the House end, state Rep. John Carson (R-northeast Cobb) said he’s looking into filing a similar bill.

While Gov. Nathan Deal has reportedly said he’s not interested in addressing the topic of gun reform, state Sen. Steve Thompson (D-Powder Springs) said it will come up anyway.

“The bottom line is it’s going to be debated in some way, shape or form,” Thompson said. “I tend to think the federal government ought to take action in that way.”

Thompson referenced the gun bills pre-filed by state Rep.-elect Charles Gregory (R-Kennesaw).

“The young boy that was elected, Gregory, I agree with him on a couple of things, but on the gun thing there’s a part he wants to take out about the governor having powers in an emergency and bio terrorism and terrorism itself, and what you’re going to do is put the public at odds with the National Guard,” Thompson said. “So you got to think these things through. Trust me, I was as guilty as any other young person down there when it came to introducing everything that I thought was a good idea. So I try to think about these things before I introduce them now.”
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anonymous
|
January 14, 2013
Earl, as long as we are airing dirty laundry and your desire for transparency, lets talk about the Georgia Tax Credit Scholarship program authored by you and Casas. It is a program designed to help kids who are enrolled in public schools obtain scholarships to private schools they otherwise could not afford. Yet I know people who have enrolled their kids that are currently in private schools into public schools just so their kids can take advantage of the program, and those kids never attended public school for one day. I know one of the local news stations that did an investigative report on it ended the segment with you saying to them "PROVE IT". To me that in itself was an indictment on the program. I would urge citizens to google this program and read the negative reports on it.www.southerneducation.org.
concernedcitizen2013
|
January 13, 2013
Abolish OCGA 9-10-150 which is a legislative stay that halts opposing parties and judges in their tracks It seems legislators are using this as a common practice for their law firms to thrive by assuring clients they WILL NEVER GO TO COURT. I have found cases stayed since 2006 that have never seen a court room. I think the big picture will surface of the abuse when this cage gets rattled in the media. In Texas it took a toll on many legislators and how they practice law. I think there are going to be some people angry with a Brunswick legislator when this is all said and done. We will be on the news during the session and hope we get some support from fellow legislators.

God Bless.

3 minutes ago · Like

Abused Citizen I have all correspondence showing this legislator never had anything to do with the case as well as the legal bills and he also prevented a competency hearing from taking place with stays. Given the tragic events around the country it seems very unethical to knowingly prevent someone diagnosed with mental disorder by a NEUROLOGIST from appearing in court. Email with any questions or request for documents from day 1 of this legislators notice of appearance
The "Glass House"
|
January 13, 2013
Dear Earl,

You sound like the kid who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Talk about everyone else as though you are innocent. People can’t talk about the Henry Grady Hotel unless they were there or knew friends and other constituents that were there. What did you do then? Participate? It wasn’t just Democrats that were there, Republicans were there as well. Maybe in the minority, but well represented. Nothing was done then by the Democratic crooks nor the Republican crooks to stop this action until the Governor (Joe Frank Harris) moved as his agenda to change things. There was an earlier attempt by Governor Lester Maddox to stop the graft, but he was kicked. Remember he was the one who made the Attorney General’s Office do their job and stop renting connected layers to do their jobs. He also established a bid process which stopped the influential from using their businesses to rip off the tax dollar. There were others that attempted to do the same, but did not get that Republican support.

Are you going to give back the monies you received because companies hired you maybe because of your position? Would you have the things you have now if you were not in your political office? Probably not. By the way, what jobs did you hold prior to being elected?

Mike Woodliff
|
January 13, 2013
I'm grateful to Mr. Ehrhart for illustrating just how corrupt our judicial, executive and legislative branches have become. As cynical as it sounds, It's best if we believe no one and trust no one. All officials should be under the public microscope at all times and that goes for the President on down to the lowest town councilman.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides