Rep.-elect Gregory’s plan: Arm everyone to stop school killings?
by Don McKee
Columnist
December 26, 2012 01:34 AM | 1371 views | 5 5 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Don McKee
Don McKee
slideshow
The way to fix the problem of school massacres and other killings is to arm everyone?

That’s apparently the idea of state Rep.-elect Charles Gregory (R-Kennesaw) who has already drafted four bills to expand gun-carrying rights beyond the wildest dreams of the most avid gun rights backers.

House Bill 26 proposed by Gregory would simply eliminate a license to carry a concealed weapon in the state. As Gregory describes it, each citizen would be “a legal weapons carrier by default of being proper age.” His criterion for packing a firearm: “If you can vote, you can carry.”

Gregory also proposes to allow churches to decide if they want guns in their services or buildings or wherever on their property. It’s a property rights issue, he says. Likewise, guns could be carried “on the campus of any public or private technical school, vocational school, college, university or institution of post-secondary education.” But he figures it is not politically feasible to include K-12 in the guns-for-everyone plan.

On that point, Gregory said of the Connecticut school massacre “if somebody was in that school, say a principal had had a firearm, he probably could have saved many, many lives that day.” That’s only supposition. Even an armed principal would have had to risk being killed in order to get a shot at the killer. However, there is something to be said for arming responsible school officials that undergo the proper training for using firearms.

Yet even if administrators — or teachers — were trained adequately, where would their guns be kept safe and secure? Next question: If they are properly secured, then can they be reached quickly enough to matter in an emergency? Also, what happens if a disgruntled student finds a gun and/or wrestles it away from a teacher or administrator? There are many pitfalls in this scenario which at first blush might seem to be an answer to school shootings but has its own set of problems and concerns.

National Rifle Association leader Wayne LaPierre has called for putting armed guards in every school, offering for the NRA to coordinate a national effort to recruit former military and police officers as volunteer guards. This may have merit, but it is the province of the local school district and parents to make such decisions. Also, the idea of volunteers may not be the best way to deal with this kind of issue. Whatever the solution, it should be of a permanent nature.

Unfortunately, the history of mass shootings in this country shows that all too often there is no clear or present danger noticed in terms of the shooter until it is too late. That is not fixed by making guns more readily available as Gregory proposes.

The NRA’s LaPierre is right about one thing: “The only thing that will stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” The operative question is: how do we get to that point without making matters worse?

dmckee9613@aol.com

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Kevin Foley
|
December 27, 2012
No, what prevents a maniac from slaughtering babies and women (the principlal at Sandy Hooks was a woman) is keeping assault rifles and high capacity mags out of the hands of maniacs. That's sensible gun safety legislation and mental healthcare, not arming everyone who can carry a weapon.

Charles Gregory thinks Kennesaw should be Dodge City? Asinine.

leChat
|
December 27, 2012
He didn't have an "assault rifle", and he could have done the same damage with a 100 year old Colt 1911 pistol with a 7 round magazine (or a revolver or shotgun, for that matter). keeping dangerous maniacs in check is a good idea... though not the one on which the anti-gun nuts want to focus.
West Cobb.
|
December 27, 2012
The issue of how to secure guns in a school is not really that problematic.

First, Students should/would never know who had the guns.

Second, I am sure that a double locking mechanism (which sends an immediate alert to school administration and the police should the lock ever be attempted to opened) could be constructed which may need verification in order to release the gun.

Third, if a school is invaded by a madman; teachers should be given a chance to defend their student's lives . I bet there are many parents and teachers in Newtown Conn. who would agree with me.

No one is suggesting that a teacher should holster a sidearm while they are instructing students or leave a gun in the bottom drawer of a teacher's desk. A survey on how teachers feel about this issue would certainly be instructional.

CTLovesNathanHale
|
December 26, 2012
Hey, Don, how about YOU disarm first and publish your address? How about the secret service turn in their guns in a show of good faith to your plan to squelch the natural right of an individual to defend themselves? You probably don't trust your neighbors with guns because you know in your heart that you are an untrustworthy little weasel and think everyone else must be sick like you are, right?
leChat
|
December 26, 2012
WITHOUT a firearm, the Newtown principal WAS killed. That's not supposition.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides