Marietta man taking city to task over raw sewage flood
by Noreen Cochran
October 16, 2012 12:51 AM | 3970 views | 3 3 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Mike Nelson is photographed in front of the rental property he owns, which was damaged due to a sewage flood. <br> Photo by Emily Barnes
Mike Nelson is photographed in front of the rental property he owns, which was damaged due to a sewage flood.
Photo by Emily Barnes
Nelson talks about the photographs he took after the flood. <br> Photo by Emily Barnes
Nelson talks about the photographs he took after the flood.
Photo by Emily Barnes
The owner of a house flooded by raw sewage from Marietta pipes wants the city to help him clean up the property.

“I thought it was a backup,” said Mike Nelson of Marietta. “My plumber (Paul Clark) said ‘No, this is a tsunami.’ He said it’s black. ‘This thing exploded. It shot up like a geyser.’”

“The amount of damage was large to all exposed hardwoods, sheetrock, baseboards, cabinets and appliances having contact with the sewage,” Nelson said about the 1958, two-bedroom, one-bath ranch home at 360 N. Fairground St.

The sewage came from the bathroom in early April, prompting his tenants to flee the rental property, Nelson said.

Initially, the city helped in the aftermath, sending out first Water Department Superintendent James Wells, then George Salhuana Jr.’s ServiceMaster Restoration Services on April 16, and paying more than $4,400 for cleanup.

Then things stalled.

“ServePro called and said there’s a situation. It would cost $15,000,” Nelson said about deeper cleaning. “At this point, Marietta said ‘Stop, forget it. We’re going to turn this over to risk management.’ I knew if risk management was involved, it would be a battle.”

Nelson said he next spoke to Elizabeth Barbera at city insurer Trident Insurance.

“She called and said, ‘We’re not liable,’” he said.

Nelson then contacted attorney Jason Nohr of Cauthorn Nohr & O’Dell.

“I said, ‘They don’t want to pay.’ He said, ‘They’ll fight and we’ll fight back,’” Nelson said.

In an Oct. 3 letter, Nohr told Mayor Steve Tumlin that the mess appears to have been caused by the city’s use of high-velocity jets of water used to clean a nearby sewer line.

The City Council denied the claim in a 7-0 vote on Oct. 10, but city attorney Doug Haynie said that was standard operating procedure.

“Georgia law requires the city to respond within 30 days. The city normally responds to deny the claim to meet the 30-day requirement and then it gets further review by staff,” he said.

The city got the letter too soon before the meeting to give it a proper review, Haynie said.

The issue will likely appear on the City Council’s agenda for the Nov. 14 meeting, Haynie said.

Nelson said he’s already frustrated by the ordeal.

“When they walked away, that set it off,” he said. “I’m not asking for the world. All I’m asking is for them to clean it up.”

Nohr said the dollar amount of the claim has “not been quantified” yet, as numbers are still coming in from contractors for repairs including restoring the hardwood floors and removing mold in the $110,000 house.

“We’re gathering quotes on restoring it to its pre-raw sewage, pre-‘tsunami’ condition,” he said.

Meanwhile, Nelson said he has done all he can to salvage the property, which once brought in $700 a month in rental income.

“I go out there and mow the grass and try to air it out,” he said.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Time to pay up
October 16, 2012
So, the city doesn't have to clean up its messes? What would happen if Smyrna "accidentally" dumped several tons of manure on City Hall? Something tells me they'd be demanding that they fix their mess and pronto!! Time to step up and be accountable, City of Marietta!
Robert Hand
October 16, 2012
All properties at or below street level should have a backwater valve. Usually not required by code---install one anyway.---plumber speaking with 40 years experience.
October 16, 2012
Well, is the City going to be AWOL in this situation or they going to step up and do the right thing?? Of course, the City should fix this and its disgraceful that it has taken so long. This man is faced with a problem not of his own making, but the City's and furthermore, because of it, is being deprived of part of his livelihood. If my councilman votes against this, I will not vote for him in the next election. These people need to see to it that this man is treated fairly.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides