About Benghazi, people died, and Obama lied
by Deroy Murdock
October 15, 2012 12:00 AM | 2919 views | 5 5 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
An anonymous State Department official told the Associated Press last Tuesday: “That was not our conclusion” — namely that a notorious YouTube video that lampooned the Islamic prophet Mohammed unleashed deadly mayhem upon America’s consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

This denial should shock anyone who watched the news after U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were murdered on the 11th anniversary of September 11.

That anti-Islamic video’s culpability certainly was the “conclusion” among top administration officials, including President Barack Obama. They fingered this video for eight days, even as evidence mounted that these Americans were slain in a commando-style operation that involved machine guns and mortar shells, not banners and placards.

As Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier and Bill O’Reilly each detailed on Wednesday, Team Obama energetically promoted this now-repudiated “conclusion.”

September 11: Despite anti-video demonstrations in Cairo, Benghazi is tranquil. According to U.S. diplomats, “everything is calm. There’s nothing unusual. There has been nothing unusual during the day at all outside. No protests all day.”

At 9:40 PM local time, however, gunfire and explosions rock the consulate.

September 12: As these homicides become clear, Obama says, “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others, but there is absolutely no justification for this type of senseless violence. None.” Obama then skips his daily intelligence briefing and jets to a Las Vegas fundraiser.

September 13: “The United States government had absolutely nothing to do with this video,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declares. “We absolutely reject its content and message.”

September 14: “The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney announces.

That day, as the murdered Americans’ remains reach Andrews Air Force Base, Clinton says: “We have seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

September 16: United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice calls the violence “a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video.”

September 18: Obama tells comedian David Letterman that he rejects the “extremely offensive video directed at Mohammed and Islam.” Obama adds that “extremists and terrorists used this as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies, including the consulate in Libya.”

September 19: Team Obama abruptly changes tunes. National Counterterrorism Director Matthew Olsen informs the Senate Homeland Security Committee, “I would say yes, they were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy.”

Why would Team Obama essentially accuse a video of these murders, even as Lt. Col. Andrew Wood — leader of a 16-man, dedicated military unit withdrawn from Libya last August — called the hit “instantly recognizable” as terrorism?

During Obama’s difficult campaign, that fantasy was far more palatable than this reality: a pre-meditated, well-executed al-Qaida strike on a U.S. mission eradicated four Americans, even after they longed for the security assistance that might have prevented them from coming home in caskets.

Ambassador Stevens warned Washington that Libya “remains unpredictable, volatile, and violent.”

Eric Nordstrom, a former U.S. security officer in Libya, told the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee on Wednesday that State documented 230 security incidents in Libya between June 2011 and July 2012. Nordstrom consequently requested 12 more security personnel.

“You’re asking for the sun, moon and the stars,” a regional director complained. Nordstrom concluded that “we were not going to get resources until the aftermath of an incident.” He wondered, “How thin does the ice need to get until someone falls through?”

These inconvenient truths would have obviated Team Obama’s “bin Laden is dead/al Qaida is comatose” re-election theme. Thus, the same government that apparently leaks secrets to make the president look tough evidently oozed falsehoods to keep him from looking weak.

In short: People died, Obama lied.

Deroy Murdock is a columnist with Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University.
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anonymous
|
October 15, 2012
4,500 Americans dead in Iraq...90,000 dead Iraqi civilians...$1 trillion dollars. No accountability.

Give me a break.

anonymous
|
October 16, 2012
Ron Paul bot, get a life. Move on. Stop smoking that weed.
anonymous
|
October 15, 2012
What 'lie'?

“extremists and terrorists used this as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies, including the consulate in Libya.”

Where is the 'lie'? In your view were the attackers not 'extreme'? Not 'terrorists'? Or did they not tout the video as one rationale for the attack? If you are going to defame somebody by labeling them a 'liar' you could have the courtesy to pinpoint exactly what it is you believe is a 'lie'. That would allow others to make a judgement on the soundness of your opinion on what constitutes 'lying'.
annettektodd
|
October 15, 2012
The lie is that the White House said they could only respond with what they "knew". How can you "know" something that never was (and were never told).?
Deli9
|
October 15, 2012
From the moment it happened regular everyday Americans knew it was an attack. You would have to be a moron not to have not been alert to 9-11 eleven years later.Obama went to Libya bypassing Congress. This is his mistake and to think he wanted to cover-up this horrid massacre is the truth. So close to election he would never want his gross erroe of judgement public. He got caught pure and simple.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides