I am 83 years old and watching a dangerous young man who has hypnotized a vast portion of our people, especially Kevin Foley and Bill Press, into believing every word he says. But the president’s invisible self emerged at the Wednesday debate. In response to Romney making him look like a school boy in over his head, Foley immediately blasted forth with a dose of character assassination of both Romney and Ryan. Two men he knows nothing about.
His hero, the invisible Obama, studied under two professors, Cloward and Piven, at Columbia University who outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government and entitlement demands. And, now there he is purposely “overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos and is intent on destroying capitalism and our country from within.” He even told us during his campaign for President that “we need to transform America,” while magnificently leaving out ... to what.
As quoted by a classmate attending Columbia when Obama was there, “His plan is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a Socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival.” One can only assume from their continual scurrilous articles that this is the man Foley and Press want for president.
Our Constitution has been skirted, ignored or trampled on as never before in our history. Why? The answer is self-evident. Remember that invisible self. To retain an imposter, who cares little about America, as president and commander-in-chief in such perilous times is to self-destructive.
Bob Wells
Kennesaw
Follow us on Twitter!
I imagine, since you're 83, however, you partake in Social Security and Medicare and, I'm pretty sure, you welcome these "socialized" benefits in your later years.
You assume everyone who does not share your views to be low information voters who do not think for themsleves.
Secondly, your obvious bias against the older generation is pretty blatant and, quite frankly, pretty sickening. As to his partaking of Social Security and Medicare,I am sure he does. Why shouldn't he? He paid for one or both of them all his working life. It is not a handout, as you try to imply it is, in your insidious comments.
You think everyone who does not agree with your views is a "low information voter", incapable of thinking for themselves.
Your bias against the older generation is both blatant and sickening. As to partaking of Social Security and Medicare, I am sure he does. Why shouldn't he? He paid for one or both of them for his entire working life. It is not a handout, as you try to imply with your insidious comment.