Race essentially tied, but polls show Romney poised to pull ahead
by Dick Morris
September 27, 2012 12:32 AM | 2244 views | 4 4 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The published polling in this year’s presidential race is unusually inaccurate because this is the first election in which who votes determines how they vote. Obama’s massive leads among blacks, Latinos, young people and single women vie with Romney’s margin among the elderly, married white women and white men. Tell me your demographic, and I’ll tell you whom you’re voting for. I’ll be right at least two times out of three!

Most pollsters are weighting their data on the assumption that the 2012 electorate will turn out in the same proportion as the 2008 voters did. But polling indicates a distinct lack of enthusiasm for the president among his core constituency. He’ll still carry them by heavy margins, but the turnout will likely lag behind the 2008 stats. (The 2008 turnout was totally unlike that in other years, with all-time historic high turnouts among Obama’s main demographic groups.)

Specifically, most pollsters are using 2008 party preferences to weight their 2012 survey samples, reflecting a much larger Democratic preference than is now really the case.

In my own polling, I found a lurch to the Democrats right after their convention, but subsequent research indicates that it has since petered out. Indeed, when one compares party identification in the August and September polls of this year in swing states, the Democratic Party identification is flat, while the ranks of Republicans rose by an average of two points per state.

Pollster Scott Rasmussen has the best solution to the party I.D. problem. He weights his polls to reflect the unweighted party identification of the previous three weeks, so he has a dynamic model that adjusts for sampling error but still takes account of gradual changes in the electorate’s partisan preferences.

Finally, with Obama below 50 percent of the vote in most swing states, he is hitting up against a glass ceiling in the high 40s. He can’t get past it except in heavily Democratic states like New York or California. The first time Obama breaks 50 will not be on election day. Either he consistently polls above 50 percent of the vote or he won’t ever get there in the actual vote.

So here’s where the race really stands today based on Rasmussen’s polling:

* Romney leads decisively in all states McCain carried (173 electoral votes).

* Romney is more than 10 points ahead in Indiana — which Obama carried (11 electoral votes).

* Romney leads Obama in the following states the president carried in 2008: Iowa (44-47) North Carolina (45-51), Colorado (45-47) and New Hampshire (45-48). He’ll probably win them all (34 electoral votes).

This comes to 218 of the 270 Romney needs. But ...

Obama is below 50 percent of the vote in a handful of key swing states and leads Romney by razor-thin margins in each one. All these states will go for Romney unless and until Obama can show polling support of 50 percent of the vote:

* Obama leads in Ohio (47-46) and Virginia (49-48) by only one point (31 electoral votes).

* Obama leads in Florida (48-46) and Nevada (47-45) by only 2 points (35 electoral votes).

If Romney carries Ohio, Virginia and Florida, he wins. And other states are in play.

* Obama leads in Wisconsin (49-46) by only 3 points (10 electoral votes).

* Obama’s lead in Michigan is down to four points, according to a recent statewide poll.

* Obama is only getting 51 percent of the vote in Pennsylvania and 53 percent in New Jersey. And don’t count out New Mexico.

It would be accurate to describe the race now as tied. But Romney has the edge because:

* The incumbent is under 50 percent in key states and nationally. He will probably lose any state where he is below 50 percent of the vote.

n The Republican enthusiasm and likelihood of voting is higher.

* The GOP field organization is better.

That’s the real state of play today.

Political consultant Dick Morris is a commentator for Fox News.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Mr. Nick
|
September 27, 2012
Mr. Morris,

Your analysis is filled with false assumptions, woeful inaccuracies, and faulty analysis. Instead of referencing only one pollster, Rasmussen, whose polls have had a significant bias in favor of conservative candidates all year long, why not turn to an analyst who objectively evaluates all the pollsters bias and errors in methodology, weighs them, and then offers a realistic view of the actual preferences of the electorate? Sound too good to be true? Well, here is a link to Nate Silver's site: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/27/sept-26-could-2012-be-like-2008/

By contrast, your intellectual dishonesty is pathetic. I don't know if your are trying to convince yourself or your potential readers but either way, its only 40 days until wake up time. See you on election day.

Romney 2012
|
September 29, 2012
Rasmussen was number 1 in getting the last presidential election correct. I don't really know what more I need to say. Rasmussen is the better pollster, maybe you are the one who is being dishonest. Just because the NY Times does a poll that doesn't make it accurate. Dick Morris is just getting out the truth.

Yes, election day is fast approaching. Hope you are ready for some change.
Calistress
|
September 27, 2012
It's funny how the conservatives try to mold their fantasy into reality.

Step away from the crack pipe Dick!
chas holman
|
September 27, 2012
Dick Morris is smoking better stuff than I have.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides