Senator Rogers’ attorney denies allegation of ‘double dipping’
by Megan Thornton
September 21, 2012 12:53 AM | 4029 views | 3 3 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Sen. Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock): His attorney says he has cut a check to his campaign committee as a step to correct an allegation he was improperly reimbursed for campaign funds. <br> File photo
Sen. Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock): His attorney says he has cut a check to his campaign committee as a step to correct an allegation he was improperly reimbursed for campaign funds.
File photo
slideshow
CANTON — Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock) came under fire this week for allegedly being improperly reimbursed for campaign expenses, but his lawyer now says the money was a proper use of taxpayer funds.

Attorney Doug Chalmers of the Political Law Group said Thursday that Rogers was within the law when his campaign committee, Friends of Chip Rogers, was reimbursed out of state coffers for various mailings.

Allegations surfaced Wednesday when Jim Walls of Atlanta Unfiltered, an investigative news website, reported Rogers billed taxpayers for $8,100 in spending that was also reported as campaign expenses.

Rogers received the reimbursements from the General Assembly for mailings, printing and newspaper inserts that went out to his constituents, with some expenses cited as postage as well as printing and publications

“They were not campaign mailings, they were constituent mailings and had nothing to do with his election or re-election,” Chalmers said, who was hired by Rogers last week.

“It was proper for him to be reimbursed because he had loaned his campaign tens of thousands of dollars which were used to make these expenses in first place. There will be no double dipping — it’s perfectly legal,” Chalmers said.

Chalmers said Rogers has already taken steps to correct the matter.

“Even to avoid an appearance of impropriety, when the issue was brought to his attention, he cut a personal check to his campaign for $8,500,” Chalmers said.

Chalmers said that $8,500 check will be on Roger’s Sept. 30 campaign disclosure

But William Perry, executive director of Common Cause Georgia, said that Rogers could still face possible consequences.

“I think it could potentially be a problem because the senator notarized a document certifying that everything in the report is true,” Perry said. “I think it would raise a red flag that the campaign, if it was paying for the expenses, is against the law and swearing he paid for himself would potentially be a problem.”

Georgia law prohibits using taxpayer money to pay for campaign costs. Lawmakers can use state funding for newsletters and other printed materials intended to keep constituents informed about issues, which Chalmers said the funds were used for.

Chalmers also refused Thursday to confirm that Rogers’ campaign is doing an audit of its finances.

Some of Rogers’ reimbursements dated to 2003, but most of the money was paid out earlier this year.

The state reimbursed Rogers $6,700 between February and May for printing and mailing costs, according to reports. His campaign disclosures also listed the same amount for printing and mailing.

Though state law includes fines and possible jail time for expenses illegally billed to taxpayers, Senate expense accounts are not audited.

Perry said there were a couple of problems he saw with what Rogers did.

“As I read state law, Senate members can be reimbursed for Senate-related business from their personal account as opposed to their campaign committee… that can’t be done. That seems to be in contrast with what Rogers’ attorney said,” Perry said.

Secondly, the appearance that the campaign made the expenditure, on campaign reports, then the Senate reimbursed Rogers personally for that amount, ”his campaign reports do not show return of that money,” Perry said.

“The way it looks is he had his campaign pay for it, then he received the money himself,” Perry said. “You’re not allowed to use campaign funds for personal use; they can only be used to advertise the campaign.”

Perry said he did not think anyone was out to steal money, but because of lack of oversight, politicians become careless.

The Associated Press contributed to this article.
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Average Joe
|
September 21, 2012
How many times must a persons morals be called into question before people realize "If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, guess what? Its a duck"
Patrick Thompson
|
September 21, 2012
"It wasn't me!" he cries again and again. When is a mass mailed constituent letter not a campaign piece? Especially when it's only to certain constituents?
Just Wait
|
September 21, 2012
Chip Rogers, "I am a Republican. I am above reproach!"
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides