Proposed Marietta map would place 7,000 residents in new districts in ’13
by Geoff Folsom
September 07, 2012 01:05 AM | 3044 views | 3 3 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Marietta Councilman Johnny Sinclair <br>(File-MDJ)
Marietta Councilman Johnny Sinclair
(File-MDJ)
slideshow
MARIETTA — A proposed redistricting map for the Marietta City Council and school board could mean more than 7,000 residents will have new representation by next year.

But Councilman Johnny Sinclair, chairman of the three-member redistricting committee, said he worked to keep the redistricting map similar to the one council members currently serve under, which was drawn up after the 2000 Census.

“I wanted to make it as painless as possible,” he said.

The committee, which also consists of Councilwoman Annette Lewis and Councilman Anthony Coleman, reviewed the map at a short meeting Thursday evening. Sinclair said he plans to present it to the entire Council at a special called meeting at 6:30 p.m. Monday. He then wants to show the map at two “open house” meetings before having official required public hearings at regular council meetings in October and November.

The map must be submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice by July 2013 to ensure any issues are dealt with by November 2013, the next Council election.

The most time-consuming issue with the redistricting process has been creating a majority-black ward. With the map that will go before the Council, black residents would constitute 50.01 percent of Coleman’s ward. Sinclair said the largest change with the district is that it takes in several apartment complexes on Roswell Road east of Interstate 75 and some multi-family dwellings on Bells Ferry Road in the north end of town.

The proposed districts were required to be within 5 percent of 8,083 residents, which equates to Marietta’s 2010 population of 56,579 divided by seven. As of 2010, Ward 5 had dropped to 6,989 residents. The proposed Ward 5 would have 7,946 residents.

After the meeting, Lewis said she did not agree with splitting the Manget area between hers and Coleman’s districts. She said Council is legally required to keep “communities of interest” as intact as possible, though she admitted that can be overruled by federal regulations requiring majority-minority districts.

“We need to listen to our residents,” Lewis said.

Councilman Philip Goldstein, who attended the meeting but isn’t on the committee, said everybody has to sacrifice in redistricting.

“There’s some areas I’d rather not lose, but, again, this is a numbers-driven process,” he said.

No one spoke during the public comment portion of the meeting. Sinclair said residents would get another chance to address the issue during Monday’s Council meeting.
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Always a first
|
September 07, 2012
Finally, I agree with Philip. This is purely a numbers game due to the mandated majority black district.

One would assume the mandate will help blacks in Marietta, but the way Coleman's ward is drawn, it doesn't reflect a community of interest of black residents.

But Coleman doesn't have the black community's best interest in mind, only his own.

All this trouble to draw a serpent-shaped ward for him (so he won't assualt anyone) and he won't even win the next election...
anonymous
|
September 07, 2012
What does Sinclair mean by "residents would get another chance to address the issue during monday's council meeting". As I see it, residents have had

NO CHANCE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE...YET. But since when did residents ever mean anything to the city of Marietta. The City thinks the resident tax payers are just a bunch of sheep. OM, where some folks are good and some folks are not so good.
Geeze-
|
September 07, 2012
Stop being such a BABY! I believe there has been at least 6 public meetings on this. Do your part by checking the website for meetings.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides