Georgia Voices: John Barge is a hero
by Rome News Tribune
August 21, 2012 12:02 AM | 4600 views | 10 10 comments | 19 19 recommendations | email to a friend | print
State voters are being asked on Nov. 6 to make one of the most vomit-inducing choices of their lives … and we don’t mean the presidential contest. The proposed constitutional amendment to give the state power to create charter schools anywhere it wishes, using tax money that it once gave to support your children and grandchildren in local public schools, is one of the most nightmarish proposals ever floated.

Frankly, this newspaper having been a supporter of the really, truly charter-school concept long, long before it was distorted into a mindless political weapon of deception, hasn’t even known where to begin in warning readers about it. This Trojan horse is, pure and simple, designed to destroy — not improve — local-level public education.

Early polls show most voters, being far too easily and routinely deceived, might actual favor what little the ballot will say on the matter — apparently many believe “charter” to be shorthand for “freedom of choice” instead of, as in this instance, meaning the freedom to spend your tax money to pay for somebody else’s choices. And, defeating this would not stop local creation of charter schools (there are already about 100 in the state). However, approving it would allow charter schools the local community has said it does not desire to be rammed down its throat.

This newspaper continues to support true charters that are paid for and governed and directed and supervised and supported by the local voters and their elected officials. Also it especially supports magnet schools, which are far more needed and focused and could be created by the charter method — in fact, that’s what the highly respected county “career academy” actually is. Not only that but the entire Floyd County system — every single school — is already officially designated as of charter status in the sense that teachers, parents and community members have a hands-on role in direction and decision making. That’s the way to go, not having the state’s politicians, with their appointed cronies, telling hometown citizens/parents what their schools should be like, teach and who would be allowed to attend.

Thus, it is with appreciation for true guts that all should applaud the position taken by John Barge, the state school superintendent who resides in Floyd County. In open defiance of his own Republican Party, that seems to prize blind obedience above intelligence, he came out against this amendment — and swinging.

This is no small example of political bravery. This amendment was floated by GOP Gov. Nathan Deal (after the Georgia Supreme Court had struck down as unconstitutional an earlier attempt by the state to take over local public education). That all GOP members of the local delegation actually voted for this atrocity would be reason enough to vote them out of office — except nobody is running against them. Citizens beware: You get what you allow to happen.

Barge, who should get a “profile in courage” award, did not hold his fire, saying: “I cannot support the creation of a new and costly state bureaucracy that takes away local control of schools and unnecessarily duplicates the good work already being done by local districts, the Georgia Department of Education and the state Board of Education. This constitutional amendment would direct taxpayer dollars into the pockets of out-of-state, for-profit charter-school companies whose schools perform no better than traditional public schools and locally approved charter schools.

“Until all of our public-school students are in school for a full 180-day school year, until essential services like student transportation and student support can return to effective levels, and until teachers regain jobs with full pay for a full school year, we should not redirect one more dollar away from Georgia’s local school districts — much less an additional $430 million in state funds, which is what it would cost to add seven new state charter schools per year over the next five years.”

The danger in this being on the ballot is that it doesn’t at all look like what the public would get. What appears on the surface is like asking voters “Do you think children should be able to read and write?”

It doesn’t explain that such charters could set their own admission requirements, which some fear would mean denying entry to the poor, minorities and special-needs children who some, sadly, believe “drag down” the opportunities offered their own little geniuses.

It does not reveal that the legislature has already set it up for any such state-blessed charters to receive more than twice as much in taxes as “ordinary” children in local public schools get from the state ... and takes those extra sums away from them. By the way, parents who already ante up tuition to send their children to this community’s several excellent private schools have particularly good reason to be infuriated.

Not only that but that could just be the start of the money diversion as, in HB 797, there is this interesting clause:

“Actively seek, with the assistance of the department, supplemental revenue from federal grant funds, institutional grant funds, and philanthropic organizations. The commission may receive and expend gifts, grants, and donations of any kind from any public or private entity to carry out the purposes of this article.” (The italics are ours.)

Also, among the many booby traps in plain sight on something few voters will ever read (the actual legislation) it says the state can define attendance zones — including of up to “statewide” size.

The state already has such as the School for the Deaf in Cave Spring. Perhaps that envisions special boarding schools for future violin virtuosos or Nobel Prize winners — with the taxpayers anteing up for room and board, probably in Atlanta, as well as education.

Or, this could allow a “statewide” boarding school, say at Sea Island, with admission requirements limited to the children of legislators and Georgia government employees making more than $100,000.

This thing is ugly, ugly, ugly and downright un-American. Barge is a hero for standing up against it and every voter in this state, including supporters of what charter schools are really supposed to be, should join him in not only voting “No!” on this come Nov. 6 but in crushing it so viciously that nothing of like evil would dare be attempted ever again.

Comments
(10)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Just Sayin'
|
August 25, 2012
The only way to fix education is to give people a choice. Politically, there is no other alternative. The staus quo is too well protected. I am fortunate in that I can make choices to educate my kids, but the public as a whole is at the mercy of erroneus school board zoning.
GCA Family in Coweta
|
August 22, 2012
The local tax money you pay will always go to your county school system. That money does not follow your student to the charter school. However, possibly the money the state gives your local school for your child being there could follow the child to the charter school, and it should follow the child. Why in the world should a local school be able to keep money the school is given from the state if my child is not there.

As another posted stated, some of these charter schools, GCA in particular, are putting out exceptional students/grades. GCA offers many options for my child that my local school system doesn't offer and will never offer.

Everyone, do your homework. Don't believe everything you see printed in the newspaper or see on the news. Go read the House bill. Learn for yourself. Do research.
Momoftwods
|
August 22, 2012
Kennesaw Resident - where in the world does it say that this will take away funds from local schools??

Lots of people are saying that but I see it no where in the amendment.

Kind of like saying something is fact but not showing the evidence.

Prove it to me!! And no one seems to be able to do that!
Cherokee Resident
|
August 21, 2012
All I know is the charter school my son goes to is wonderful. It's creation also reduced the head count in the normal county controlled schools. I have no facts but I'm sure that was a benefit to the county controlled school. I've lived in my county for 16 years now and all I see is the same old cronyism at the top of the board not wanting to change for the better...They are all in cahoots with the teachers and are afraid of change... John Barge is a hero to the current entrenched lifer local government administrations and teachers that are so used to being told what they can and can not do not that they can not make any rational decisions on there own.
anonymous
|
August 22, 2012
Glad your charter school is great. It was either approved by the local system, or the current state board. So, if it is in place, what is the problem? Obviously, the current local and state approval system works, and schools are being funded. I will vote NO on the Nov. ballot.
Agitator1
|
August 21, 2012
Someone please explain why the Parents of a Child that goes to a private School should pay taxes to a public School Board.
@Agitator1
|
August 31, 2012
For the same reason that I pay taxes for roads I may not use....
HeroOfTheStupid
|
August 21, 2012
John Barge is a hero! He will keep our state near the bottom of the barrel in education.

We've got one of the nation's worst educational systems yet our thoroughly useless Supers, Admins, and Teachers DO NOT WANT THIS TO CHANGE.

Competition is bad only to those who embrace failure...I.E. Most of this state's educators.

Barge's next step: TEACHER UNIONS!!!
Momoftwods
|
August 21, 2012
Frankly this amendment confuses me and I think that many folks are twisting it into something that it is not!!

Where is "the legislature has already set it up for any such state-blessed charters to receive more than twice as much in taxes as “ordinary” children in local public schools get from the state ... and takes those extra sums away from them".

FYI - there is already a charter school that is statewide!! It is called Georgia Cyber Academy.

Clearly, our current Georgia education system is completely succeeding so I see no reason to try different things (can you hear the sarcasm!!!)

Come on folks - our charter schools in this state are pumping out great education and the test scores prove it!! And they DO NOT get the same funding as public schools! Charters get substantially less funding and they are succeeding!!

Still, I am confused about what this amendment has in it and how it benefits local schools and charter schools. So I will continue to do my research:)

Kennesaw Resident
|
August 21, 2012
It does not benefit local schools and will in fact take dollars away from the local school systems to support the state chartered schools.

I will be voting "NO." Barge is right.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides