The T-SPLOST - Road program or stimulus? You be the judge
July 28, 2012 10:53 PM | 4979 views | 9 9 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
COBB AND METRO AREA RESIDENTS will vote Tuesday on whether to approve a 10-year sales tax that even supporters now say is aimed more at stimulating the local economy than tackling traffic congestion.

If the TSPLOST referendum is approved, metro area residents will pay a 1 percent sales tax on most purchases for the next decade. In light of the propensity for government construction projects to take forever to complete and run way over budget; and due to the necessity to fund future maintenance and operation costs of the possible rail and bus lines proposed, it’s a sure thing that even if the TSPLOST passes on Tuesday, that a decade hence area taxpayers will be asked for a 10-year sales tax extension, and most likely another one 10 years after that.

Just call the TSPLOST “the tax that came for dinner and never left.”

***


EVEN TSPLOST SUPPORTERS now concede the project list will not cure congestion in Cobb or the metro region — or even reduce it significantly. They admit that if it’s built “the other guy” will ride the rail cars or buses, thereby reducing congestion for you on the highway. And what was initially portrayed to the public as a visionary transportation initiative has now metamorphosed into a grandiose public works program. A “stimulus” program, if you will.

There’s no question that we have severe transportation challenges in this area, and no doubt that the TSPLOST would provide plenty of jobs in coming years as the new infrastructure was added. But would those jobs be the best use of tax dollars? No. Taxpayers don’t mind paying for public works projects when they fulfill an obvious need. Yet despite our traffic problems, most Cobb residents are yet to be persuaded that most of the projects that would be funded by the TSPLOST — especially the big-ticket items, like the “premium” bus service and the possible rail line — are truly needed. Rather, they see the TSPLOST as a thinly veiled taxpayer subsidy to deep-pocketed business and development interests, and would also mean the loss of local control over county road improvements.

***


COBB Commission Chairman Tim Lee and Kennesaw Mayor Mark Mathews, who represented Cobb on the metro committee that compiled the TSPLOST project list, erred badly when they signed off on plans to build a tremendously expensive light rail line from the MARTA Arts Center Station in Midtown northward to Cumberland Mall. Only about a mile of the track would be in Cobb, and thus the bulk of Cobb’s TSPLOST dollars would have been spent in Fulton County.

The rail line is viewed by many as the pet project of well-connected Galleria and Cobb Chamber of Commerce interests, eager for a direct rail link to the Atlanta airport and Atlanta job market. Moreover, foes point out that metro Atlanta has the lowest density per square mile of any metro area in the world that has a population of greater than 2.5 million people. We simply lack the density to support such a rail line. And the massive amounts of tax dollars that would be poured into rail and/or premium buses would hamstring our future ability to address the rest of our transportation needs.

As state Rep. Ed Setzler (R-north Cobb) has noted, passage of the TSPLOST would translate to an additional $3,500 in taxes for every household in metro Atlanta over the next decade, or roughly $350 per household per year. And the cost in communities that generally are higher on the economic scale, like Cobb, would be even greater.

Moreover, traffic congestion is much worse on Interstate 285 eastward from the I-75 junction at the Galleria than it is southward on I-75 south of that junction. So the rail line was an attempt to solve what is by far the lesser of the two problems. Had the rail line been slated for the 285 corridor instead, it would have found more support. And had the rail construction been slated to start in Acworth and move southward, perhaps in conjunction with a north-bound construction effort from the Midtown station (with a linkup somewhere in between, a la The Transcontinental Railroad), that also might have found more public buy-in. As it is, many suspect that even if the Midtown-to-Galleria rail is built, funding would never be forthcoming for the leg northward to Acworth.

After the rail proposal was shellacked by the public, Lee backtracked, saying the money would most likely go to pay for “premium bus service” in the I-75 corridor. Meanwhile, county officials are awaiting the results of the “Alternatives Analysis” study, which will make recommendations on what type transit would be best suited. Unfortunately, and incredibly, that study will not be complete until after county residents have voted Tuesday. Can you say “pig in a poke”? And according to knowledgeable TSPLOST opponents, if the AA study recommends rail instead of premium buses, Cobb’s TSPLOST dollars would easily be shifted back to pay for rail, and without any say from the public.

***


ONE OF THE MOST FREQUENTLY HEARD ARGUMENTS made on TSPLOST’s behalf in recent days was “It’s not the perfect project list, but …” That’s hardly a ringing endorsement. In fact, it’s like saying that of one’s future bride that, “She’s not the wife I had hoped for, but …”

And we suspect that by Tuesday evening it will be abundantly clear that this was not the transportation fix that Cobb residents wanted and is not a tax they want to pay … and pay … and pay.
Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Cobbres1
|
July 31, 2012
Couldn't have said this better MDJ. Thank you for speaking on behalf of most of Atlanta RESIDENTS. While many residents live in the city, there are more companies that reside than people who work for these companies. Had the T-Splost recommending expanding public transportation from where the people actually live (such as Cobb and north of the Perimter)into the city, this would have made sense. Building more roads doesn't rid of the traffic. It may dilute it a little but it doesn't get rid of the cars. When you don't provide actual transportation solutions, the referendum comes off as being simply political rhetoric that makes it look like they're trying. We don't need to be pacified, we need ACTUAL solutions. Had they proposed a rail from Cobb Galleria even to Roswell AND midtown, I might have thought hmm, there is a solution because from Cobb to Roswell is a huge issue on 285. And, I hate the argument, "you have to start somewhere...". Well, how about starting with some REAL starting points that make sense and make it appear that you are protecting the real residents of Atlanta and not just the corporations. Bring in REAL unbiased, non-Atlanta based traffic analyzers and get real proposals on the table. I'd like for them to go back to the drawing board and stop treating the people of Atlanta like we were just born yesterday. Move the politics aside and come with some real solutions. THAT'S where you start!!!
Can't Get Ahead
|
July 31, 2012
The last thing we need is another tax and everyone turns to Cobb for the money and the support.

I wonder if Cobb County was paying for their "Consultants of Choice" while they were out this morning at 4 am as they were putting out the vote yes signs for the TSPOLST?? Isn't that a conflict of interest to have James Hudgins of Arcadis, large supporter of the TSPLOST and to Tim Lee's campaign being housed in the DOT's offices? What crock!
Around in west Cobb
|
July 30, 2012
So, are they widening Whitlock avenue with all this money?
anonymous
|
July 31, 2012
Didn't see that project on the list....seriously, any County that has a SPLOST already will be getting their roads fixed anyway. Do we really need a statewide SPLOST? Just what Atlanta needs to help with the traffic...THE BELTLINE. That will most definitely help traffic!

VFP42
|
July 30, 2012
"Only about a mile of the track would be in Cobb, and thus the bulk of Cobb’s TSPLOST dollars would have been spent in Fulton County"

What did the MDJ want? Light rail between the Avenues East and the Avenues West? From the Big Chicken to Town Center Mall? What would have made y'all happy? Hmmmmmm?

It seems to me if you want light rail into the city, you have to start in the city. Huh. How 'bout that.

Nah let's keep pourless limitless amounts of money into our owning and operating our own personal vehicles on top of that hardened ground we pay so much for.

jhsss
|
July 29, 2012
Neither. Just another overpriced tax for politicians to fight over and waste.
SG68
|
July 29, 2012
Thank you MDJ for coming down on the side of common sense and responsible government as it relates to this issue.

Regardless of the outcome on Tuesday you have done yourself proud.

I just wish the Atlanta Urinal and Constipation had been a little more even handed in their position on this issue.

Their editorial in Sunday's Edition is so wrong headed and full of misinformation it should be classified as fiction.

but

I guess when your parent company (Cox Enterprises) donates $250,000 to the pro TSPLOST propaganda campaign you don't really have much of a choice on what position to take?
Pat H
|
July 29, 2012
It is a distribution of honest citizens' money to developers and political cronies, who will then hire illegals that the taxpayers again support and subsidize their large families.

This has been the norm for all large government projects in the past.

The IMAGE program, which will actually audit the payrolls of these companies as well as their subcontractors on down, has been tabled until January by Tim Lee, Helen Goreham and Woody Thompson. Another gift to their political cronies.
best article
|
July 29, 2012
yet...not only a stimulus package promoted as traffic relief, but the project list is awful and can be changed after the election. I am still in shock Matthews was re-elected, and hope so much that Lee will be voted out. Thanks for the article, anyone in Cobb who votes for TSPLOST is a best uninformed and more likely just foolish!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides