Pro-war Romney went to France to dodge ’Nam
by Kevin Foley
Columnist
June 01, 2012 01:01 AM | 2250 views | 35 35 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
There’s a 1966 Associated Press picture of Mitt Romney. In it, we see the 19-year-old Stanford University student at a campus demonstration, a not uncommon event in those days.

Back then, young men were being drafted to fight a war many of them believed was unjust so they spoke out on college campuses and occupied administration buildings across America in protest.

Except Romney enthusiastically supported the Vietnam War and the draft, so he attended a pro-war, pro-draft counter-protest at Stanford where the photo was taken.

It’s reasonable, then, to assume Romney was ready to do his bit back in the day. If a young patriot and future leader felt as strongly as Mitt did about the Vietnam War, surely he’d lead by example and volunteer to fight Communism.

Now 65, the GOP presidential nominee is a slick package. From his carefully coiffed and dyed hair to his thousand-dollar custom loafers, Mitt conveys charisma, confidence and character, all the things you want in the leader of the free world — and all of it is a sham.

The man who described himself as “resolute” during the GOP primary has reversed his positions on virtually every major issue since leaving the Massachusetts governor’s office just six years ago. Then there were his years as a vampire capitalist, sucking life out of troubled companies while fallaciously claiming he created a hundred thousand jobs.

But there is nothing in Romney’s past as brazenly hypocritical or unrepentantly cynical than his support for a war he refused to fight himself.

Like other privileged young men in the late 1960s, Mitt thought it was just fine for the poor kids to do the fighting and dying in Vietnam. It was tough luck, too, for the middle class guys who exhausted their deferments and were shipped off to the meat grinder as the war escalated in 1967.

But if your name was Romney and your father was an influential industrialist and politician, you could find a way to avoid combat. And Mitt did. At just about the time he would have run out of draft deferments, Romney abruptly left Stanford to spend two years in France proselytizing for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.

While less fortunate American boys fought a deadly enemy in pestilential jungles, Romney wandered Paris selling Mormonism door-to-door, dubiously exempted from the draft as a “minister.”

When he returned home in 1970, the Vietnam War was winding down because most Americans were finally sick of it. They’d come to understand the protesters had been right all along. The war was unjust, the draft unfair, and the dominoes never fell in Southeast Asia.

Unscathed, young Mitt finished school, got married and made millions. Now he wants your vote.

His supporters will point the finger at his critics and say “What about you?” It’s the irrelevant argument they always use to deflect attention from inconvenient facts.

The critics aren’t running for president, but Mitt Romney is. The candidate would have us believe he is a man of unshakeable conviction and deeply principled with the fortitude to lead America. Yet, look at his resume and you see nothing but deception and distortions, from his college days right up to the present.

Twenty years ago, the right was quick to slap the “draft dodger” label on Bill Clinton, who opposed the war, because he studied in England as a Rhodes Scholar. Using that popular conservative measuring stick, what else can one call Mitt Romney?

Kevin Foley is a PR executive, author and writer who lives in Kennesaw.
Comments
(35)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Dream ON
|
June 09, 2012
@some patriot

You are merely repeating the talking points of left wing blogs. Nothing you say is accurate or truthful. Kerry's time in South Viet Nam is well documented. His officer fitness reports clearly state he was an incompetent officer, self-centered, and a failed leader. You are not old enough to have served in the military during the Viet Nam War, and in fact, your writings indicate you never served in the military at all. If you are going to talk about Kerry, please speak factually and stop parroting what you read in left wing blogs.
Middle Class Patriot
|
June 04, 2012
One more time to cut through the liberal leftist disinformation. John Kerry was exposed as a fraud, devoid of any leadership skills, by his former Navy shipmates, including his former commanding officer. While in the Navy, Kerry was out for himself and did not care about the men in his charge, a trait that is not tolerated in the military. The liberal lamestream media tried repeatedly to suppress the story of Kerry's treachery,but thanks to the new meadia, Kerry's lies and fraud were exposed and made public.
just sayin
|
June 07, 2012
If by "new media" you mean FOX you must be out of your mind!
some patriot
|
June 07, 2012
Those who actually served under Kerry's command speak highly of him. Ierry's commanders and scores of interviews with swift boat officers and crewmen depict a model officer who fought agressively, in river ambushes and won the respect of many of his crewmates and commanders. Of the men often quoted and often identified as "John Kerry's shipmates" only one of them Steve Gardner actually served under Lt Kerry's command on a swift boat. How well of these men knew Kerry is questionable, and descrepancies between how some of them described Kerry thirty five years ago and how they describe him today suggest that their opinions are largely based upon political differences rather than objective assessments of Kerry's military record.
Samuel Adams
|
June 02, 2012
Look at the leftist Democrat standing up for service in Vietnam. Where were you, Mr. Foley? No doubt cutting your teeth at some of John Kerry's bulloney fake medal throwings...no doubt hanging around the other flakes on campus, sipping whatever passed for lattes back then or smoking whatever liberal leftist hacks smoked (if you were wanting to be president, I guess that would be pot).

This criticism of Romney is simply laughable. Might not be if he were running against someone with a decent record, military or political. But he's running against Obama, the empty suit from Chicago who won't release his college records or much else about himself. Good try buddy, but no go.
Take Back America
|
June 02, 2012
Here we go again. The liberal left preaches that we must have tolerance for all. Yet, Foley singles out Romney for his Mormon religion and finds fault because Romney practices Mormonism, including Mormon missions. Foley, missions are an inherent part of the Mormon faith, not something Romney invented for his convenience. Your Mormonphobic statements clearly reveal your bigotry for Mormons.
reagan rules
|
June 02, 2012
Mitt Romney's service to our country should not be underestimated! While his peers were enjoying only one year of "fun in the sun" in the rice paddies of Viet Nam, Mitt was faced three years of slogging the lonely roads of France. Armed only with his suit and tie and the Book of Mormon as he tried to convert the "Frenchies" to Mormonism. Deprived of his Ferarri, his sailboat and his family mansion he was forced to live with common people. For a young Mormon lad it have pure agony denying yourself French wine, French food and those Oooh-la-la girls. Mitts willingness to sacrifice himself should be appreciated by all Americans.
why o why
|
June 02, 2012
why does no one bring up what obama was doing during his earlier years? Or is that just not fit to print in a family newspaper? Romney was trying to do good, and Obama was just trying to get high.
Phatphil
|
June 01, 2012
Why are Mr. Romney's hair style and choice of footwear pertinent to this argument? The fact that these are even mentioned clearly point to an ugly bias based on jealously and hatred on the part of Mr. Foley.
Sgt Tank Drive
|
June 01, 2012
Let us not forget how the Democrats have repeatedly told us that any and all criticism of Obama is racist. Now when we even suggest that criticism of Romney may be Mormonphobic and bigotry, they scream foul. Once again Democrats display their hypocrisy.
Steve Rhinehart
|
June 01, 2012
Since you are so fond of facts, why not look at these?

There are many reason some people did not serve. you forgot those who became long term students, went to work for other branches of the government, (FBI etc.), joined the Peace Corps or other such humane movements, took jobs in critical industries, were married and had kids. had physical or mental deficiencies, had criminal records or joined the other 100,000 plus who simply fled across the border into Canada, thus breaking the laws of two countries simultaneously. In short, there were a lot of reasons people did not serve. To lump them all into the category of “draft dodgers” is ludicrous.

The fact of the matters is that of the pool of eligible men less than 9% were drafted. Based on your logic, that means the other 91% “refused” to serve and were, therefore, “draft dodgers”. Further only 34% of those in the military during that era saw service in the Vietnam theater. Do you also have a name for the other 66%?

Finally, as has been pointed out in other blogs, young men of the Mormon Church regularly go on missionary assignments. In my opinion, only a left wing radical, atheist would equate service to one’s church with draft dodging. Only another left wing radical atheist would defend him for so doing.

Simon Sez
|
June 01, 2012
@O'Halle

You are still thinking legacy media. This is NOT a place for legacy letters-to-the-editor. This is a new media blog. Just trying to catch you up to the times there ole fella.
Benny O
|
June 01, 2012
@ollie halle

Nice rant. Now how about telling us what your point is? And you have as yet to answer my questions? Dan Rather in fact did smear Bush's military service with vicious lies and it did in fact cost Rather his reputation and job. Oh, and you can Google that too, as you suggest.
Kevin Foley
|
June 01, 2012
Benny O (whoever you are) - when I'm done Googling Dan Rather and AWOL Bush Jr., I'll Google Kerry right wing smear job by Texas billionaires.
Oliver G. Halle
|
June 01, 2012
I too believe in freedom of conscience, and my letters to the editor over a lot of years, public speeches, and those who know me will attest that I consider it to be the most important of our freedoms. If you knew anything about my background growing up, something a little bit of easy searching would reveal, you would have a better appreciation for the reasons I hold the First Amendment to be sacred and the cornerstone of our liberty. I absolutely believe in the secret ballot. I also support the requirement that all newspapers in America impose on letter writers, that they sign their letters for publication.

To suggest that I might hold a bias against Mormons, without a scintilla of evidence, is contemptable. Again, a modicum of research, since I do identify myself, would show just the opposite. Can one assume that since the anonymous writer suggested I am the bigot, that in fact s/he is and is hiding under a rock so that no one who knows you will reveal the truth about your religious and/or racial prejudices?

My military service is well known by those who know me, and if you do about thirty seconds of internet research. If anyone is serious about challenging it, please identify yourself and I will give you an opportunity to prove to the world that I and my military and public service are a fraud.
Mormon Tabernacle
|
June 01, 2012
Halle and Foley, It would seem you have bigotry against Mormons? Your comments certainly indicate that you Mormonphobic.
Sgt Tank Drive
|
June 01, 2012
Hey Mr halle, since you know so much about military service, how about detailing your own military service for us? Then after that, how about telling all about Obummer's military service? Finally, tell us how Dan Rather knew so much about Bush's military service that it resulted in Rather having to leave in shame for using falsified documents in an attempt to discredit Bush's military service.
Benny O
|
June 01, 2012
@ollie halle

Very simple answer to your questions. Because fringe leftists need to be kept at arm's length. Do you also advocate doing away with the American secret ballot too? Do tell.
oliver g. halle
|
June 01, 2012
Interesting that some bloggers question why the MDJ allows Kevin Foley write his "leftist rants." I would question the MDJ on why they allow people to hide under rocks to protect their identities while they throw the worst garbage from the safety of their rat holes. Perhaps they have pasts that they are ashamed of. I guess the readers can't know without these folks using their real names. Foley summed it up: Romney dodged military service despite his support of the war, and now he talks tough as though he is an experienced general with combat experience who can lead our military. What Foley left out was that in 2008, Romney was asked by a reporter if his sons had volunteered to serve in the armed forces. Romney replied that they were working on his campaign, something he considered the equivalent of military service. He later had to eat those words, but the smear he left on our American fighting men and women still remains. I hope enough people remember it when Romney touts why he should be the CINC.
Mrs. Silence Dogood
|
June 01, 2012
My Dear Mr. Halle,

Anonymity in print has been a part of American history long before you graced us with your presence and is a fact of life with the age of the internet. I once said "Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech". People feel more freedom to speak their mind in this forum and your wish to expose their identities only serves to limit that speech. Our fore fathers rebelled against this type of tyranny.

I do believe Mr. Foley has the God given right to air his thoughts no matter how misguided and envious they are.

I am, Sir, Your humble servant,

Silence Dogood
CobbCountyRedneck
|
June 01, 2012
I don't know whether it was your goofy photo or the headline of your column that caused me to peruse your ramblings this morning.

but

Regardless of whether your criticisms of Romney are facts or you were just experiencing another inebriate induced leftist fantasy, it will not make any difference in the way I cast my vote in the upcoming election.

When you look at the other choice (if you can call Obama a choice) it makes it crystal clear who I am going to support.

southernbychoice
|
June 01, 2012
Strange how liberals like Mr. Foley use the term "reversed" his position - but when talking about their hero in the White House it becomes they have "evolved". Just another example of the hypocrisy of liberals. Could't be fair if their lives, or the lives of their children, depended on it.
Kevin Foley
|
June 01, 2012
FTD (whoever you are) - Don't let the facts I mentioned get in the way of your reactionary ravings.

It's what you folks on the far right do when confronted with unshakeable truths: attack the messenger. For every 10 mindless blowbacks like yours I might read one reasoned, thoughtful post from someone who disagrees with me.

KSU Student
|
June 01, 2012
Mr. Foley,

It is not uncommon for Mormons to go on missions. Romney's Father went on one and every year thosands of Mormons do. Your wild speculation that Romney only went on a mission to avoid the Vietnam war is dubious at best.

For some perspective the following members of Romney's family went on missions:

Great-Grandfather

Grandfather

Father

Two Uncles

Brother

All five of his Sons

Facts are facts. Wild speculation is wild speculation.
Kevin Foley
|
June 01, 2012
KSU Student (whoever you are) - You miss my point.

Back in the late '60s, it was common for college students to apply for a draft deferment from the selective service. If you were a student in good standing you might get one, perhaps two, but that was it. The timing on Romney's departure from Stanford suggests he ran out of deferments and bolted rather than face the draft. Other gays went to Canada. In France, he wasn't a "minister" in the common understanding of the word. He was recruiting new members.

Regardless, if Mitt was so gung-ho, pro-war, pro-draft and he considered himself a leader, he should have enlisted and lead by example. Talk is cheap when the bullets start flying.

Foley Truth Detector
|
June 01, 2012
Foley, we have to thank the MDJ for allowing you to demonstrate yet another of your feckless liberal leftist rants. You are excellent entertainment, despite the fact there is not a shred of truth in your leftist rants. We hear Chris Matthews is searching for a sidekick on MSNBC, perhaps you should submit your resume? The Viet Nam era permanently split a generation, which is the dominating theme of those times, something you totally ignore in your hate filled ravings.
@truth detector
|
June 01, 2012
"another of your feckless liberal leftist rants."

Quite so. If the MDJ did not publish Foley, I would miss a big clue as to the mental illness of some liberal minds. A puzzlement to me is how foley's "negathink" gets him any business in the PR field. I would only hire him if I wanted to fail.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides