Back then, young men were being drafted to fight a war many of them believed was unjust so they spoke out on college campuses and occupied administration buildings across America in protest.
Except Romney enthusiastically supported the Vietnam War and the draft, so he attended a pro-war, pro-draft counter-protest at Stanford where the photo was taken.
It’s reasonable, then, to assume Romney was ready to do his bit back in the day. If a young patriot and future leader felt as strongly as Mitt did about the Vietnam War, surely he’d lead by example and volunteer to fight Communism.
Now 65, the GOP presidential nominee is a slick package. From his carefully coiffed and dyed hair to his thousand-dollar custom loafers, Mitt conveys charisma, confidence and character, all the things you want in the leader of the free world — and all of it is a sham.
The man who described himself as “resolute” during the GOP primary has reversed his positions on virtually every major issue since leaving the Massachusetts governor’s office just six years ago. Then there were his years as a vampire capitalist, sucking life out of troubled companies while fallaciously claiming he created a hundred thousand jobs.
But there is nothing in Romney’s past as brazenly hypocritical or unrepentantly cynical than his support for a war he refused to fight himself.
Like other privileged young men in the late 1960s, Mitt thought it was just fine for the poor kids to do the fighting and dying in Vietnam. It was tough luck, too, for the middle class guys who exhausted their deferments and were shipped off to the meat grinder as the war escalated in 1967.
But if your name was Romney and your father was an influential industrialist and politician, you could find a way to avoid combat. And Mitt did. At just about the time he would have run out of draft deferments, Romney abruptly left Stanford to spend two years in France proselytizing for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
While less fortunate American boys fought a deadly enemy in pestilential jungles, Romney wandered Paris selling Mormonism door-to-door, dubiously exempted from the draft as a “minister.”
When he returned home in 1970, the Vietnam War was winding down because most Americans were finally sick of it. They’d come to understand the protesters had been right all along. The war was unjust, the draft unfair, and the dominoes never fell in Southeast Asia.
Unscathed, young Mitt finished school, got married and made millions. Now he wants your vote.
His supporters will point the finger at his critics and say “What about you?” It’s the irrelevant argument they always use to deflect attention from inconvenient facts.
The critics aren’t running for president, but Mitt Romney is. The candidate would have us believe he is a man of unshakeable conviction and deeply principled with the fortitude to lead America. Yet, look at his resume and you see nothing but deception and distortions, from his college days right up to the present.
Twenty years ago, the right was quick to slap the “draft dodger” label on Bill Clinton, who opposed the war, because he studied in England as a Rhodes Scholar. Using that popular conservative measuring stick, what else can one call Mitt Romney?
Kevin Foley is a PR executive, author and writer who lives in Kennesaw.












Follow us on Twitter!
You are merely repeating the talking points of left wing blogs. Nothing you say is accurate or truthful. Kerry's time in South Viet Nam is well documented. His officer fitness reports clearly state he was an incompetent officer, self-centered, and a failed leader. You are not old enough to have served in the military during the Viet Nam War, and in fact, your writings indicate you never served in the military at all. If you are going to talk about Kerry, please speak factually and stop parroting what you read in left wing blogs.
This criticism of Romney is simply laughable. Might not be if he were running against someone with a decent record, military or political. But he's running against Obama, the empty suit from Chicago who won't release his college records or much else about himself. Good try buddy, but no go.
There are many reason some people did not serve. you forgot those who became long term students, went to work for other branches of the government, (FBI etc.), joined the Peace Corps or other such humane movements, took jobs in critical industries, were married and had kids. had physical or mental deficiencies, had criminal records or joined the other 100,000 plus who simply fled across the border into Canada, thus breaking the laws of two countries simultaneously. In short, there were a lot of reasons people did not serve. To lump them all into the category of “draft dodgers” is ludicrous.
The fact of the matters is that of the pool of eligible men less than 9% were drafted. Based on your logic, that means the other 91% “refused” to serve and were, therefore, “draft dodgers”. Further only 34% of those in the military during that era saw service in the Vietnam theater. Do you also have a name for the other 66%?
Finally, as has been pointed out in other blogs, young men of the Mormon Church regularly go on missionary assignments. In my opinion, only a left wing radical, atheist would equate service to one’s church with draft dodging. Only another left wing radical atheist would defend him for so doing.
You are still thinking legacy media. This is NOT a place for legacy letters-to-the-editor. This is a new media blog. Just trying to catch you up to the times there ole fella.
Nice rant. Now how about telling us what your point is? And you have as yet to answer my questions? Dan Rather in fact did smear Bush's military service with vicious lies and it did in fact cost Rather his reputation and job. Oh, and you can Google that too, as you suggest.
To suggest that I might hold a bias against Mormons, without a scintilla of evidence, is contemptable. Again, a modicum of research, since I do identify myself, would show just the opposite. Can one assume that since the anonymous writer suggested I am the bigot, that in fact s/he is and is hiding under a rock so that no one who knows you will reveal the truth about your religious and/or racial prejudices?
My military service is well known by those who know me, and if you do about thirty seconds of internet research. If anyone is serious about challenging it, please identify yourself and I will give you an opportunity to prove to the world that I and my military and public service are a fraud.
Very simple answer to your questions. Because fringe leftists need to be kept at arm's length. Do you also advocate doing away with the American secret ballot too? Do tell.
Anonymity in print has been a part of American history long before you graced us with your presence and is a fact of life with the age of the internet. I once said "Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech". People feel more freedom to speak their mind in this forum and your wish to expose their identities only serves to limit that speech. Our fore fathers rebelled against this type of tyranny.
I do believe Mr. Foley has the God given right to air his thoughts no matter how misguided and envious they are.
I am, Sir, Your humble servant,
Silence Dogood
but
Regardless of whether your criticisms of Romney are facts or you were just experiencing another inebriate induced leftist fantasy, it will not make any difference in the way I cast my vote in the upcoming election.
When you look at the other choice (if you can call Obama a choice) it makes it crystal clear who I am going to support.
It's what you folks on the far right do when confronted with unshakeable truths: attack the messenger. For every 10 mindless blowbacks like yours I might read one reasoned, thoughtful post from someone who disagrees with me.
It is not uncommon for Mormons to go on missions. Romney's Father went on one and every year thosands of Mormons do. Your wild speculation that Romney only went on a mission to avoid the Vietnam war is dubious at best.
For some perspective the following members of Romney's family went on missions:
Great-Grandfather
Grandfather
Father
Two Uncles
Brother
All five of his Sons
Facts are facts. Wild speculation is wild speculation.
Back in the late '60s, it was common for college students to apply for a draft deferment from the selective service. If you were a student in good standing you might get one, perhaps two, but that was it. The timing on Romney's departure from Stanford suggests he ran out of deferments and bolted rather than face the draft. Other gays went to Canada. In France, he wasn't a "minister" in the common understanding of the word. He was recruiting new members.
Regardless, if Mitt was so gung-ho, pro-war, pro-draft and he considered himself a leader, he should have enlisted and lead by example. Talk is cheap when the bullets start flying.
Quite so. If the MDJ did not publish Foley, I would miss a big clue as to the mental illness of some liberal minds. A puzzlement to me is how foley's "negathink" gets him any business in the PR field. I would only hire him if I wanted to fail.