Members of Canton’s reservoir committee met with board and staff members of the Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority in downtown Woodstock in an attempt to settle disagreements about the reservoir, including projects needed to complete the facility and the future of Canton’s stake.
They discussed whether Canton can sell its portion of the $100 million reservoir to Cherokee County Water and Sewerage Authority, or if they can make a deal with other potential buyers, and who is going to fund improvements such as a new office building and computer monitoring system.
Officials attending the meeting include: Canton Mayor Gene Hobgood, Canton City Manager Scott Wood, Canton’s Reservoir Manager David Hatabian, Canton City Council members Glen Cummins, John Beresford, Bob Rush and Bill Bryan; Cobb authority General Manager Glenn Page, Board Chair and Smyrna Mayor Max Bacon, board members Don Mabry and Earl Smith and the authority’s reservoir manager Heath Lee also attended the meeting.
Page said it is unlikely the Cobb-Marietta authority would stand in the way of a sale to the Cherokee County authority, but wants to make sure his agency has the right to match an offer if Canton should try to sell its stake in the Hickory Log Creek Reservoir to a private company or investor.
The Cobb general manager said they fear a private company may have different goals for the project than a public entity like a water authority.
“But we are trying to be creative in finding some solutions that’ll work for everybody,” he added.
Page said that while no action was taken at the meeting, it was only an opportunity for both sides to hear each other’s concerns.
“It was more of trying to find some common ground,” he said. “The meeting was very cordial, but it was also honest.”
Discussions Monday centered on whether the improvement projects could be scaled back.
“They want to be assured that everything we put in there is necessary for operation and there’s no bells and whistles,” he said, adding the authority has already reviewed the project’s costs for extras.
Cummins said he and other Canton council members want to be sure the authority and the city aren’t wasting taxpayer dollars on an elaborate building.
“Unless they come (back) with a highly revised building, I can’t go along with it,” he said.
The meeting comes on the heels of the Cobb authority unanimously rejecting Hobgood’s request to give up its say in who the city can sell its 25 percent stake to the reservoir.
Right now, Canton can only sell its portion if Cobb agrees, which Hobgood has said is keeping the city under water on the deal.
Hobgood’s request to look for other buyers came after a consultant hired by Cobb last month advised against the authority taking over the city’s 25 percent ownership in the reservoir.
The consultant said the value of Canton’s share would depend on whether Cobb’s authority can get approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw additional water from Lake Allatoona.
The Cobb authority owns 75 percent of the reservoir, while the city is responsible for its 25 percent of the ownership.
However, the city of Canton has 50 percent of the decision-making ability about the reservoir.
Page said both entities agreed on working toward a memorandum of understanding that would give an entity interested in purchasing Canton’s share “a level of comfort” in negotiating with the city.
Also discussed was the historical background on why the city in 2006 agreed to delete Section 402 of the original agreement, which revoked Canton’s ability to unilaterally walk away from the reservoir project costs and sell its share of the reservoir to any buyer it chose.
The completion of the reservoir has rested on the city council approving two portions of projects at the reservoir: an office building and a SCADA computer monitoring system.
The Canton City Council has held up those projects, citing budget concerns.
In 2000, Canton and the Cobb-Marietta authority entered a 50-year agreement to build the pumped-storage reservoir just off the Etowah River.
The Cobb authority is paying three-fourths of the tab, with the city responsible for the remainder — with the same split for sharing the drinking water supply created by the reservoir.
The nearly $100 million price tag for the dam and reservoir was significantly more than the original $20 million estimate when officials approved the project in 2000.
The city took on $10.3 million in debt in 2005 for the reservoir and another $8 million two years later to help fund its portion of the project.
In 2009, the council approved bonds of as much as $8 million to finance the remaining costs.
Last year, Canton approached the authority to purchase its stake in the reservoir, which was part of an overarching plan for the city to reduce its water and sewer costs.
“We all understand the financial situation of the city,” Page said. “We all want to help them. Of course, we have obligations to our customers and the money we have is public money that’s entrusted to us to use to serve our customers.”
The city has also bounced around the idea of selling its share to the Cherokee County Water and Sewerage Authority, which provides water to unincorporated Cherokee residents as well as serving residents in Holly Springs, Waleska and parts of Woodstock.
Hobgood said the city will continue to work with the authority in completing the reservoir, but added he still thinks the city should be allowed to market its 25 percent stake to any entity it chooses.
“Since they have indicated our portion has no value to them, I don’t think it’s good we be held hostage from being able to market our portion legitimately to other utilities,” he said.
Hobgood added he understood the authority’s desire to “control” who they enter into a partnership with in the future, but “we ought to be able to make that decision.”
— Staff Writer Geoff Folsom contributed to this report












Follow us on Twitter!
Workers who are on the job 24 hours a day, including all holidays are told that even a dollar an hour is too much. Imagine that, a buck an hour once over 4 years (25 cents a year average)is too much to pay.
Meanwhile the CCMWA and the board have spent millions on the dam, millions on a new plush office for 19 upper management blue bloods and 100 million on new plant construction.
I'm not saying that the Authority should not spend money. However, the Authority's hard working employees are the reason the CCMWA is so financially well off. The workers should have priority, especially after 4 years at the exact same rate of pay.