Cobb GOP chair says TIA ads are ‘pure advocacy’
by Jon Gillooly
jgillooly@mdjonline.com
April 07, 2012 12:00 AM | 2715 views | 11 11 comments | 19 19 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The chairman of the Cobb Republican Party, Joe Dendy, said the transportation referendum advertisements being funded with the help of Cobb’s two community improvement districts are by no means neutral.<br>Staff/File
The chairman of the Cobb Republican Party, Joe Dendy, said the transportation referendum advertisements being funded with the help of Cobb’s two community improvement districts are by no means neutral.
Staff/File
slideshow
MARIETTA — The chairman of the Cobb Republican Party, Joe Dendy, said the transportation referendum advertisements being funded with the help of Cobb’s two community improvement districts are by no means neutral.

While Lynn Rainey, attorney for the CIDs, says it’s legal for the two districts to give tax dollars to the Metro Atlanta Voter Education Network to run advertisements about the transportation referendum, Dendy’s not so sure.

“I would certainly like to see a second opinion on that,” Dendy said. “It is taxpayer money.”

Dendy said he was thinking about the topic just the other night as he was opening up a mailer about the July 31 referendum while at the same time listening to a TV ad about the topic.

“It’s pure advocacy,” Dendy said.

Dendy said the ad uses “a little bit of a scare tactic” regarding what would happen if the referendum to raise the sales tax by 1 percent fails, “along with all these grandiose things that will happen if you do pass it.”

“For the general population who does not look deeply into things, it’s going to affect their vote,” Dendy said. “That’s politics, although it doesn’t mean it’s right.”

State Sen. Lindsey Tippins (R-west Cobb), Tea Party leader Debbie Dooley of Dacula and several candidates for county commission chairman said Friday they agreed with Dendy that the MAVEN ads are advocating passage of the tax, not simply serving as education pieces, as Cumberland CID Chairman Tad Leithead claims.

“The ‘education’ that they’re doing is all one-sided,” Tippins said. “They’re not talking about any of the downside that I mentioned, which is the long-term financial commitments. I think if you have education on any issue, you give people the pros and the cons and let people make their own (decision).”

For example, Cobb’s project list in the Transportation Investment Act does not contain sufficient funding to cover the operating expenses of a possible light rail line from Cumberland Mall to Midtown, Tippins said.

State Rep. Ed Setzler (R-Acworth), chairman of the Cobb Legislative Delegation, said there is no question that $2.1 million in non-profit donations and CID tax dollars are being spent to secure a political victory.

“If spending money for the purpose of winning at the ballot box is not political speech, then I’m not sure what is,” Setzler said. “If candidate Newt Gingrich had established a 501(c)3 nonprofit that spent millions of citizen’s tax dollars leading up to the March primary to fund ‘voter information’ about the former Speaker’s record of balancing the federal budget, reforming welfare and lowering taxes, the person responsible would be on their way to jail.”

While Cobb Commissioner JoAnn Birrell said in Friday’s MDJ that the community improvement districts’ “money comes from their (business) members,” that is not entirely accurate.

Community improvement districts are formed when commercial property owners inside a geographic area agree to tax themselves. They then leverage that revenue to win larger grants of county, state and federal tax dollars for their projects, taxes paid by everyone.

Rainey pointed this out in a Tuesday letter to the commissioners, noting that in its 24-year history, the Cumberland CID’s commercial property owners “have contributed $100 million of their taxes to procure $500 million in matching funds for improvements.”

Dooley, co-founder of the Atlanta Tea Party, is calling for an investigation into the matter by either Cobb District Attorney Pat Head or Attorney General Sam Olens, saying the CIDs are engaged in unlawful behavior in violation of the Constitution.

“It’s just money laundering,” Dooley said. “It’s money laundering to give to an entity to use taxpayer money to ask taxpayers to raise taxes on themselves so these CIDs can have more money, and I think there needs to be an investigation into that.”

Dooley also believes the CIDs’ boards need to get a second legal opinion.

Even if the CIDs’ actions turn out to be legal — the matter has yet to be decided in a court of law — Dendy said there are moral implications.

“There’s a difference between what’s legally right and wrong and what’s morally right and wrong,” Dendy said. “You have to look at what’s morally right and wrong. I can’t look at myself in the mirror the next morning if I don’t look at things that way, but for a lot of people it just doesn’t seem to bother them. If it’s legally right, they’re going to do it.”

Cobb Board of Commissioners Chairman Tim Lee believes the CID board members are engaged in proper behavior, but his opponents disagree.

On Sunday, Larry Savage, one of the candidates for county commission chairman, emailed Cobb’s five commissioners, calling on them to stop the CIDs from funneling money into the advertising campaign. Fellow candidate Mike Boyce of east Cobb also believes the ads are one-sided.

“I think the louder they say they’re not using this kind of educational program to advocate for TIA, the less credibility they’re having,” Boyce said. “The material that I have seen doesn’t reflect both sides of the argument, which is what you want to do on an impartial approach. All the material I’ve seen through my mail clearly indicates that there is nothing except good that comes out of the TIA. That’s clearly not the case.”

At the same time, Boyce said it’s important not to lose sight of all the good the CIDs have done for the Cumberland and Town Center areas.
Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
CobbCountyRedneck
|
April 09, 2012
I agree with Tippins.

It seems that MAVEN is only reporting the facts that are favorable to the TIA.

And those "facts" seem to be exaggerated or at the very least optimistic speculation about the positive impact of the TIA on our region.

They are not providing a complete picture. They conveniently avoid the equally important facts about the TIA that might cause voters to question, rightfully so, the long term impact of the approval of the TIA referendum.

Common sense dictates that there is more than one side to this TIA issue.

I also concur with Dendy when he says that there is a difference between what is considered legal and what is ethical.

I guess it is too much to expect from our leaders to observe both of those worthy attributes when there is a $7 billion pot of gold, or should I say slush, waiting for them at the end of the rainbow.
Dendy forLibertarian
|
April 09, 2012
Dendy is out of touch with reality. Look at all of the people who were quoted in this article. What do they have in common? They have not accomplished anything except to sit back and complain. Debby Dolley? Give me a break. What a loud mouth and on top of that, nothing comes out. Deny, you complained about taxes, SPLOST and now TIA. You should become the Tea Bagger spokesman when the real republican party wakes up and boots the baggers out.
SG68
|
April 07, 2012
The fact that the CID's, most of them if not all, are making these "contributions' to the MAVEN propaganda campaign should be looked at closely.

The attorney for Town Center and Cumberland also represents most of the other CID's so they are getting the same legal advice and opinions.

Therefore there are not going to be any differing opinions that might make the various CID Board members question the appropriate nature of these contributions.

As I have posted previously.

Is it illegal? Probably not. It skirts the fine line of legality.

Is it unethical? Most assuredly.
the truth
|
April 09, 2012
And do you have a legal degree? Thought not. So what you have is just another opinion.
SG68
|
April 09, 2012
@ the truth

Read my comment again.

Did I offer it as a legal opinion?

No, I did not.

I offered it as my opinion. Nothing else.

And as for your snide comment about me having a legal degree.

You are right I don't. I chose to dedicate myself to a higher goal and earned a Masters' Degree in Business.

By the way, speaking of educational attainment, did your graduate from grammar school with passing marks in reading comprehesion? Thought not.
Knowledge Is Good
|
April 07, 2012
It is a good thing the moral fiber of our collective consience does not rise and set in accordance with Mr. Dendy's mirror. Nudge, nudge .... there is a possibility that someone might disagree with you and your prism of right and wrong. Ms. Dooley obviously likes using words like "money laundering" (twice) out of context to try to enhance her mirror's perception of right and wrong. Please read the definition of money laundering and respond exactly how your conclusion was reached. Mr. Setzler's analogy is based on his self-accepted opinion that MAVEN money is spent for "the pupose of winning at the ballot box." It is not. It is an effort to inform "the general population who does not look deeply into things" as Mr. Dendy said. Any effort to inform the "general population" sounds like education to me. As Thomas Jefferson once said "I know of no safe depositiry of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education." This is what MAVEN is trying to do. This is a Yes or No vote. Mr. Dendy, Ms. Dooley and Mr. Setzler: Instead of trying to discredit a Yes vote, please educate me as to the virtues of a No vote. After all, as Emil Faber said, "Knowledge Is Good."
INSULTED--AGAIN
|
April 07, 2012
What fox is charged with guarding this particular henhouse?

Sam Olens'office "coulda-shoulda-oughta" already be on this. He didn't mind asking for my vote. But it takes a State Rep or Sen to get a response from his office.

IMO that part of the transportation referendum legislation that promises to take away traditional maintenance money from any region that does not approve this 'New Tax' should also be criminal. That is OUR money from fuel tax they will be taking away.
Boyce says
|
April 07, 2012
"..doesn’t reflect both sides of the argument, which is what you want to do on an impartial approach." Boyce, what an educational piece does is not ARGUE but gives facts. What I read is factual and informative. Vote how you wish, Boyce, but many of us believe it is the right thing at the right time. We are tired of being one-upped by Gwinnette and Charlotte! We want progress, but some of you want stalemate or even slipping out of site. Please consider taking your negative, disruptive voices to some other county.

AngryGOP
|
April 07, 2012
Funny how Joe Dendy talks about ethics when he was one of the people who helped fix the 2010 GOP convention for his candidate of choice by stacking the delegate slate from Cobb County. I don't know what to think about all this CID business but Joe Dendy talking about ethics is just funny.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides