It’s time for the also-rans to bow out
April 06, 2012 12:01 AM | 1171 views | 8 8 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
After Tuesday’s primary contests, where he was crushed in Maryland, the District of Columbia and, worst of all, Wisconsin, a must-win where he once led, it is more than clear that Rick Santorum is not going to be the Republican presidential nominee.

Nor will he have enough delegates, even combined with those of Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul, to deny Mitt Romney the nomination outright.

During some of the debates, when the former Pennsylvania senator played nice-nice with Romney, it seemed as if he were angling to be the onetime Massachusetts governor’s running mate. That opportunity, if it ever existed, is long gone. Certainly saying, as Santorum absurdly did last week, that the nation would be better off in a second term for President Barack Obama than a Romney presidency permanently, closed a lot of doors.

Additionally, the politically and religiously conservative Santorum is not likely to have much influence on the party platform — not that platforms matter much anymore. Perhaps seeing which way the political winds are shifting, the Tea Party-movement wing of the GOP — which one would imagine as Santorum’s natural constituency — has seen most of its favorites line up behind Romney.

Santorum’s claim to have a special appeal to ethnic blue-collar workers in Midwest industrial states was debunked by losses in Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin and Illinois, where, pointing up another of his problems, Romney outspent Santorum, 7 to 1.

Still, Santorum vows to fight on, saying Tuesday that it was “only halftime” in the contest. Actually, with Romney having nearly 60 percent of the delegates, it’s almost midway through the third quarter. (On Wednesday, the Associated Press gave Romney 655 delegates of the 1,144 needed; Santorum, 278; Gingrich, 135; and Ron Paul, 51.)

Smart politics dictate that now is the time for Santorum to bow out of the race gracefully rather than wait to be forced out. That message applies as well to Gingrich and Paul. Gingrich’s firepower, in particular, could be put to far more effective use for his party by blasting away at Obama than on what now is just bitter-end back-biting against Romney.

Obama, for his part, has “pivoted,” to use the latest political buzzword, from defending his record to attacking the Republicans (a “radical” party out of step with mainstream America); their budget (a “prescription for decline”); and Romney (for, among other things, using the word “marvelous” to describe that budget).

Romney, too, must pivot toward the fall campaign, concentrating his fire on Obama and his administration, but he cannot allow Santorum to go unchallenged. And Santorum says he is planning to aggressively campaign for and win the Pennsylvania primary on April 24.

A convincing victory in his home state would enable the Santorum campaign to stagger on a while longer, and it would do much to ease the sting of a humiliating 18-point loss in his bid for a third Senate term. But barring a late-breaking miracle, it won’t salvage his presidential hopes.

One can admire Santorum’s tenacity, but one must also question his political smarts. It was a good run, but it’s over.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Kevin Foley
|
April 08, 2012
The GOP primary has been some of the best political theater in years. You just can't beat the entertainment value of a cast like Perry, Bachmann, Cain, Paul, Santorum, Gingrich, and, the star, Willard Mitt Romney.

There have been so many memorable moments along the way: "three departments that'll be gone...oops", dance numbers by Mr. and Mrs. B, "food stamp president", trees of the right height, 30-foot electrified fences, outlawing contraception...the list goes on and on.

Please don't stop the show!
anonymous 1-1/2
|
April 07, 2012
"Santorum’s claim to have a special appeal to ethnic blue-collar workers in Midwest industrial states was debunked by losses in Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin and Illinois, where, pointing up another of his problems, Romney outspent Santorum, 7 to 1."

Indiana hasn't held its primary yet.
What the!?
|
April 06, 2012
Smart politics? Maybe. I'd much prefer to see the candidates remain in the race.

Take Santorum. He's not my guy. I do not agree with his platform and frankly, his evangelical fervor frightens me, I do admire his adherence to his beliefs. I admire his genuineness. And yes, his tenacity.

Santorum is not a question mark. How refreshing!? He's clearly other people's "guy". By remaining in the race he affords an opportunity for those that share his views, whether social, economic or religious, and maybe even those that love sweater vests, a voice. Remaining in the race affords an opportunity to clearly have that voice heard at the polls whether I, you, or anybody else believe otherwise.

Most importantly, remaining in the race allows those waiting to vote in their state's primary the choice to clearly vote their conscience. The chance to vote for their "guy".

Expecting voters to obligingly coalesce behind a front runner or expecting candidates to drop from a race solely for the sake of "party", or because the delegate count dictates a statistical inevitability, is wrong. It is an egregious affront to the basic principle of the process that makes America great.

Why disenfranchise any voter? Why deny any citizen the ability to cast their vote, however futile it may be, for the candidate of their choice? Why expect voters to toe anybody's line but their own?

Smart politics? Maybe to you. Maybe if the sole goal is winning. Maybe you're the kind of person that stops watching baseball once it's determined that your team can no longer make it to the playoffs.

Me? I love the game.

wonderin
|
April 06, 2012
"Why disenfranchise any voter? Why deny any citizen the ability to cast their vote." As Paul Weyerich co-founder of the Heritage Institute said, "As a matter of fact our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down". How about voter-ID laws that disproportionately impact traditional Democratic voters, the young, the elderly, blacks and hispanics.
@wonderin
|
April 06, 2012
How does the mere sight of the word "disenfranchise" constitute a valid reason for you to go completely off-topic and rant about Voter ID law conspiracies?

On second thought, don't answer that. I have a tough enough time being a democrat as it is.



just wondering
|
April 06, 2012
What effect will the attacks of Gingrich and Santorum on Romney have on their standing in the Republican Party? It's obvious, by the many prominent Republicans who have endorsed him that he is the one the Party wants to run.
Pat H
|
April 06, 2012
I was hoping that this column was about Cobb EMC after reading the title. The best candidates lead the race by a significant margin - vote for Tripper Sharp and Jim Hudson to end Cobb EMC corruption.
Ron Paul
|
April 06, 2012
You are a tool.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides