Don McKee: Cobb EMC members should do own vetting of candidates
by Don McKee
Columnist
March 16, 2012 12:00 AM | 1964 views | 32 32 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Don McKee
Don McKee
slideshow
There should not be any serious fallout from the dissension over endorsements by the Cobb EMC Owners Association for candidates for directors in the March 31 final round of court-ordered elections to fill six seats.

First, take the issue of the candidacy of Tripper Sharp, among 11 contenders for the Area 5 seat. Sharp was one of the plaintiffs who filed suit in 2007 against the EMC, charging breech of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment.

When Sharp entered the race, fellow plaintiff Butch Thompson objected, saying he “would rather a plaintiff not be a part of it.” He pointed out that plaintiffs in the derivative lawsuit could not receive any financial gains, but if Sharp wins election “then he would be gaining financially as well.” Sharp countered that despite the reforms the plaintiffs had gained, “there’s a lot more to do, and I’d like to be on the board to finish the job.”

On that issue, each side has a point. From my perspective, Thompson has the higher moral ground, and Sharp would have been well advised to forgo running if only for the sake of precluding criticism that his motive from the start was a director’s seat. On the other hand, it’s a stretch to contend that Sharp should not run for the seat because he was a plaintiff, that somehow this would be a “takeover” of the EMC. Indeed, as Sharp argues, who is better qualified than a plaintiff?

Then there’s the controversy over vetting of candidates by the Cobb EMC Owners Association of which both Sharp and Thompson were organizers. Feelings erupted after EMC CEO Chip Nelson and some EMC employees who are also co-op members showed up and voted on endorsements at the meetings. That was too much for Sharp who said, “It appears to me that the CEOA has been hijacked by the management of Cobb EMC.” He went so far as to say, “the CEOA endorsement now is simply the management’s stamp of approval.” Dianne Brackin, another plaintiff, agreed.

Sharp subsequently failed to win the association’s endorsement at last Tuesday night’s meeting. He told the Journal he came in second with 55 votes behind Charles Sevier and again said the endorsements were “an orchestrated effort by EMC management” — which CEO Nelson denied.

Butch Thompson rejected the hijacking charge and defended the right of EMC employee-members to take part in the endorsements. He said, “EMC employees have more at stake right now than anybody” and they should “be recognized as the good employees that they are.” He said he didn’t think the employees stacked the deck.

On that issue, employees who are EMC members have the right to be involved in the vetting process, same as employees who own stock in the company they work for. The elections come down to a very simple fact: EMC members should do their own vetting and vote accordingly for the best qualified candidates — regardless of any endorsement or lack thereof.

dmckee9613@aol.com
Comments
(32)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Think for yourself
|
March 21, 2012
I would like to believe that the members of Cobb EMC have enough sense to read the information we received in the mail last week and form their own opinions as to who they want to vote for. All candidates that are running for the board had the opportunity to submit their information, their reason for running and their ideas for the future of Cobb EMC. I hope each and every member will take the time to read this information and form their own opinion. At max, Cobb EMC has 3 - 400 employees that are also members. To say they can "hijack" an election is petty at best. But perhaps it is easier to blame the employees who do turn out to vote (as is their right) than the 160,000 some odd members who won't take the time. At the first meeting in September, there were approximately 3500 people there. The election in November brought about 2700. So how many will be there on March 31st? I hope the ones that do show up have taken the time to read their materials and are not just basing their vote on what they've read in the media. No one can complain this time that they didn't get the information in time to read and dissect it. So use what you've been given and make up your OWN mind.
The Judge
|
March 20, 2012
A school teacher, a sheriff, and an engineer. Who would you vote for?

Why are all these meetings of "reform groups" held in north and northeast Cobb?
FloPakrp
|
March 20, 2012
You mean to tell me that some are bothered by a block vote if true? 1000's of EMC customers cant out vote a block of few employees? Really?

I suggest you look at the candidates and vote how you feel is best and not vote because someone else does or does not.
another anonymous
|
March 19, 2012
Bottom line is that each member should make his or her own mind without considering all of the grand-standing & posturing that is going on at all of these vetting sessions.
Reply to Weldon
|
March 17, 2012
David, please stop defending the boss. He doesn't need it, we all know him to be an alright gentlemen who just went over to the dark side for awhile. Something about Chip begging a fellow member of his church to ease-up. Still, his wrong dislike has clouded his gentle soul and you

are doing your best to carry out his wrong thinking. I'm guessing voters will go against your hand picked...oh yes, you made it plain that the employee voting block was "needed" and "okay" since you interupted and blessed the EMC block vote. However, McKee has said it correctly...

"voters choose for yourself!"
Reality Check
|
March 17, 2012
It is pretty clear there are people who don't have much going on in their normal lives and they can't let go of this.

Sharp is a good example. He has no qualifications for being on the board of a major corporation, but being a name on a lawsuit made him the center of attention and he can't give it up. He is willing to break his word and insult old friends who trusted just for his own selfishness.

Make no mistake, he is the cause of all the controversy. All those people who are suddenly anti-Thompson somehow conveniently ignore the fact Bodner and Boyd were selected by the supposedly stacked crowd. Are they suddenly tainted, too? If so, why did another group just endorse them as well?

If you are crazy enough to believe the EMC stacked the crowd, then you have to believe Bodner and Boyd are in on it or at least seen as patsies - and they fooled the other endorsing groups as well.

Reality is, Sharp isn't a good choice, is self-serving and Broadwell just didn't present as well as Wilburn when the time came.

It is sad to see this ridiculous end to what had been good work just because some people can't let go.

@reality check
|
March 17, 2012
Just to clairfy: NONE of the CEOA endorsed candidates have ever serves on a CORPORATE board. Let alone "the board of a major corporation." You might want to get your facts straight before you make yourself look ignorant. Just because you worked for a major corporation doesn't mean you served on their board.
To @reality check
|
March 17, 2012
My facts are straight, and you might want to learn to read. I never said any of the candidates had served on a major corporate board.

I said nothing in Sharps background (limited resume, actions or temperament) indicate he is qualified to do so.

Again, learn to read.

anonymous
|
March 17, 2012
There are a lot of folks interested in keeping Tripper Sharp off the board...even though he is intimately familiar and knowledgeable of the problems at Cobb EMC. Who would not want him on the board? (HINT: the EMC management hacks)

Vote for Tripper Sharp if you truly give a durn about what is going on at Cobb EMC! Otherwise, rest assured that some type of "compromise" has been worked out with the EMC management hacks who have been compliant in abusing the EMC ownership(Kelly and Nelson) to make sure their personal world at EMC is not rocked.
NoWoolOverMyEyes
|
March 16, 2012
@ A Owen

You can’t differentiate between the reasons Thompson’s business has suffered. We’ve been in a great recession and a lot of businesses have suffered, especially contractors which is what Butch Thompson Enterprises is. Leaders don’t deceive those who have trusted and followed them by brokering them out behind their backs. Maybe Thompson wants a clearing and grading contract from Cobb EMC. A least Tripper was upfront about his change of heart. If he acted like Thompson he’d have put on a disguise and run under an alias.
EMC Owner
|
March 16, 2012
It was very apparent what was going on at the vetting meetings. Thompson and Welden praising the EMC management. The EMC employees block voting at the direction of Sam Kelly and Chip Nelson. It is true that there were some good candidates at the vetting. Sevier was average. I liked John Berry better than Sevier, but Tripper Sharp seemed more knowledgeable about the operations at Cobb EMC. I think it is very telling that Mr. Berry withdrew from the race today and is endorsing Tripper Sharp.
FloPakrp
|
March 20, 2012
To know the workings of something in no way means they have a good plan or can run or direct a company. To want on the board to damn all is not a good attitude.

As far as a supposed block vote, you mean there is not enough EMC members voting to make the block worthless?
Independent Voter
|
March 16, 2012
I am all for getting rid of the what is left with the present EMC Board. In fact, I think some of them should be joining Brown in court. AND I appreciate what Butch Thompson and his fellow plaintiffs have done.

However... if Thompson and his fellow plaintiffs want to really be fair and transparent now, they should hold town hall forums so EMC members can question and listen to Board candidates, but Thompson and fellow plaintiffs should NOT endorse ANYONE. They are just as quilty as any EMC employee is of "influencing" the EMC members. It is the personal responsibility of EMC members to research the Board candidates .
clmiron
|
March 16, 2012
Cobb EMC members are invited to another opportunity to meet the candidates on Tuesday, March 20th at the Mountain View Community Center.

A social hour begins at 6pm, giving members an opportunity to meet with the candidates individually and ask them any questions you may have.

You can also submit written questions for potential inclusion in the forum portion of the meeting. Due to the large number of candidates and time constraints, unfortunately some questions may not be selected.

We strongly encourage members to arrive at 6pm and make use of the one on one time with candidates to address their specific concerns.

The formal program with candidate platform comments and question session will begin promptly at 7pm.

This meeting is meant to be strictly informational for the benefit of the membership, there will be no voting or endorsement made in conjunction with the meeting.

We hope you will join us March 20th to learn more about the candidates. Please see the Cobb EMC Watch website for more details and directions.
ThanksForDoingThis!
|
March 16, 2012
In the name of openness and transparency Cobb EMC Watch should post the questions submitted but not asked on their website. They should also videotape the proceedings and make it available on their website in 15 minute or so segments. That way people who need to be at work, caring for children, etc can also get to meet the candidates.
Cobb Resident
|
March 16, 2012
This is a much more appropriate forum - come, listen and make up your own mind as to how you will vote on Saturday March 31st.

The Weldon vettings were corrupt, no secret ballots, arrive at 6:00 in Kennesaw, be on time or don't vote, and yes EMC employees knew of non-secret ballots in advance and they were watched closely one night by CEO Nelson and VP Kelly and upper managers the other nights.

All of the vettings have been flawed, corrupt and a disgrace - The four elected board should step down and stand up for a honest vetting and election. Tripper knows all of this all too well. The press did not even cover until the AJC the last night - they merely release press releases for Weldon and othes.
Employee and Member
|
March 16, 2012
Are you inviting all members of Cobb EMC, including employees that are members, or are you going to discriminate?
Openness
|
March 19, 2012
In the name of openness, Cobb EMC Watch should disclose who runs it, and whether or not they are all Cobb EMC members. Rumors are around that this group isn't even headed up by members -- what sort of nonsense is that?

If it's not true, please dispel it before we get into even more craziness.
A Owen
|
March 16, 2012
Butch's company is one of my customers and while his attention has been diverted to the EMC mess, I have watched his business suffer. I don't believe that would have been the case if he had stayed on the sidelines.

Tripper may be a great manager as managers do things right. Butch is a great leader as leaders do the right things. I will be looking for leaders to serve as directors of my EMC board. You hire a manager, you elect leaders.

Marietta, GA

(I should have used spell check before posting)
Former Candidate
|
March 16, 2012
A Owen,

I'm sorry Butch's business suffered due to his involvement as a Plaintiff and CEOA Director.If he's your customer, I hope he's still paying his bills! Since you mentioned Tripper at the same time, maybe you should ask him what he has suffered by standing up and being involved as a Plaintiff and Director of CEOA up to the time he declared his candidacy for Area 5 Board seat. I know for a fact he has suffered too. I think all Plantiffs have made huge sacrifices in time and money. They are all leaders in our community. Butch as a leader fell off the track in his leadership role of the CEOA by showing his bias publically against Tripper, who would be a tremendous member of Cobb EMC's Board and is fully qualified to serve.

Acworth, GA
ComeOn!
|
March 16, 2012
Don,

You're kidding right! Butch Thompson has the higher moral ground???? Tripper Sharp caused controversy by deciding to run after Nelson decided not to open the Board meetings like he promised??? The controversy started when Thompson, without notice, Pawn Brokered the CEOA to Nelson and his gang in order to become a Cobb County Power Broker. Who’s getting the financial benefit now? Thompson!! His buddies are now suddenly CEOA endorsed board candidates! Come on Don! This whole thing smells to high heaven!!!

@Butch is right. You say changing the candidate vetting process without notifying or getting approval from CEOA members is transparent? You say stacking the vote with Cobb EMC employees is a process issue? That’s like saying Sherman’s siege on Atlanta was just a process issue!!!
A Owen
|
March 16, 2012
Butch's company is one of my customers and while his attention has been diverted to the EMC mess, I have watched his businees suffer. I don't believe that would have been the case if he had stayed on the sidelines.

Tripper may be a great manager as managers do things right. Butch is a great leader as leaders do the right things. I will be looking for leaders to serve as directors of my EMC board. You hire managers, you elect leaders.

Matietta, Ga
Butch is right
|
March 16, 2012
"Thompson has the higher moral ground, and Sharp would have been well advised to forgo running if only for the sake of precluding criticism that his motive from the start was a director’s seat."

Well said.

Butch Thompson has been transparent and honest for five years of this EMC grief. Some may not agree with his position on some process issues, but no one can dispute his integrity.
h enough
|
March 16, 2012
You talked about Tripper Sharpe's quote last week about the endorsement being a rubber stamp from EMC management. Given that, why did he go to the vetting session on Tues. night to get the endorsement?????? I have never seen one man create so much controversy as this Sharpe guy. What kind of negative vibes will stay with Cobb EMC if he is elected. He should be voluntering to work with the DA in his pursuit againstthe former CEO and Board members and let Cobb EMC move on with a fresh Board of people who want to make the right changes with transparency. In otherwords, look at qualifications and then decide
anonymous
|
March 17, 2012
h enough, don't be a simpleton. Like many others in attendance, Sharp was there to find out just what all was taking place in the lead up to the associations endorsement. Shenanigans in = shenanigans out.
tell_the_truth
|
March 16, 2012
Don, I respectfully disagree with you. The fallout from the misguided endorsement process of the Cobb EMC Owners is that it will no longer be a rubber stamp to select the next board members, as it was in the last election.

Expect other groups and public figures to endorse different candidates than the CEOA, and expect members to weigh those recommendations carefully on March 31. I hope the MDJ will continue its coverage of all candidates in an impartial manner.
Sharp's Disservice
|
March 16, 2012
Mr. McKee you are too kind to Tripper in this article. His candidacy is the central source of all the controversy that has arisen about the good work of the Plaintiffs and the CEOA. His turncoat ways -- repeatedly telling other plaintiffs and those at public meetings that he would not run -- have split the organization at a time when it should be enjoying what it has accomplished.

There are several more qualified candidates in that area - to answer your rhetorical question- I personally prefer John Berry; but certainly nothing Tripper's done of late commends him to such an important role.
Cobb Resident
|
March 16, 2012
I am told that the only vetting night that CobbCEO Nelson and VP PR Kelly, along with a boatload of CobbEMC employees,showed up was the night that they voted down Sheriff Bill Hudson and Independent Bill Clements ! Wonder why ?
Pat H
|
March 16, 2012
Tripper Sharp is a candidate we know we can trust. Butch Thompson cannot decide for all the other plaintiffs and members.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides