Controversy tinges EMC group’s vote vet sessions
by Kim Isaza
newseditor@mdjonline.com
Mar 10, 2012 | 4854 views | 110 110 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Among five candidates gaining endorsements for the March 31 director elections are, from left, Kelly Bodner, area 3; Bryan Boyd, area 8; and Sheri Wilburn, area 9.<br>Special to the MDJ
Among five candidates gaining endorsements for the March 31 director elections are, from left, Kelly Bodner, area 3; Bryan Boyd, area 8; and Sheri Wilburn, area 9.
Special to the MDJ
slideshow
MARIETTA — Dissension and controversy has erupted out of the Cobb EMC Owners Association meetings this week, during which five candidates were endorsed for the utility’s March 31 director elections.

The five endorsed candidates are: Area 2, Rudy Underwood; Area 3, Kelly Bodner; Area 4, David McClellan; Area 8, Bryan Boyd; and Area 9, Sheri Wilburn. One more session is set for Tuesday night for Area 5, which has 11 candidates.

This past week, Cobb EMC CEO Chip Nelson and several Cobb EMC employees who are also members of the electric cooperative turned out at the two meetings, leading some skeptics to believe the vetting sessions are being stacked in favor of management-approved director candidates.

“I believe what happened is the same shenanigans they were doing at their old annual meetings to elect their own slate,” said Eric Broadwell, a candidate in Area 9 who did not win the group’s endorsement. He estimated there were 75 to 80 employees at Thursday night’s meeting, which was held at Butch Thompson’s office in Kennesaw. “Employees should be able to participate, but I don’t know if executive management should be there, because they’re basically selecting their boss.”

Nelson said that is not correct.

“We have about 170 employees who are also members, but we had only 30 employees there (Thursday) night, best I could tell, and we understand there were about 40 employees there Tuesday night,” Nelson said. “All members of the EMC have a right to be there, and several weeks ago I called and asked the Owners Association people if it was OK if our employees come and vote, and they said yes.”

Company executives forwarded to all employees an email from the Owners Association giving dates and locations for the meetings, Nelson said, though he insisted that none of the employee-members attended the meeting while on company time.

As for his vetting votes, Nelson said he doesn’t look at it as though he’s choosing his boss.

“I look at it as what’s best for the members of the co-op,” he said. “The members need to look at the candidates as individuals, and they ought to look for the best ones they think should do the job. If they strongly feel there should be someone else, they should vote for that person.”

Tripper Sharp is one of the 11 candidates who will vie for the group’s endorsement on Tuesday night, and he is also one of the plaintiffs that brought the 2007 derivative lawsuit that has transformed the management of the utility. The Owners Association was originally formed by the plaintiffs to the suit.

“It appears to me that the CEOA has been hijacked by the management of Cobb EMC,” Sharp said, adding that he’s not surprised. “They are so desperate to keep the status quo.”

Sharp said that on Tuesday night, about 20 people were turned away from voting in the first area because they arrived late. Once vetting in an area began, no more ballots were given out. Also, members could not cast their ballots until after hearing all the candidates in an area.

“I think the CEOA endorsement now is simply the management’s stamp of approval,” Sharp said. “You can’t tell me that when you have people who depend on EMC for their livelihood, they’re not going to be motivated to vote a certain way.”

Dianne Brackin, another one of the plaintiffs, agreed.

“It’s very obvious there were numerous employees there. People had just come in from working, and others were staying there a long time with crying children,” Brackin said. “I can’t believe they were there by their own volition.”

Still, when asked if the Owners Association had been hijacked, Butch Thompson, who was part of the plaintiff group and hosted the vetting meetings at his construction company’s offices, said “absolutely not.”

“EMC employees have more at stake right now than anybody,” Thompson said. “The ballgame changed when none of the board members sought re-election. I’m not disappointed in any person who’s been endorsed so far. Several people had supporters there with them. Former Sheriff Bill Hutson had an entourage of people there.”

Hutson is a candidate in Area 3 but was not endorsed by the group.

“It’s important for the employees to be involved because their future’s at stake. If we’re going to move forward with a progressive EMC, it’s time for those folks to be recognized as the good employees that they are,” Thompson said. “Did they stack the deck? I just can’t see it.”

David Welden, one of the organizers of the Owners Association, said he kept an eye on the employee-members Thursday night “because I knew there was some complaining from people defeated at the previous vetting.”

“They were working diligently and treating it as highly important,” Welden said. “They were all there at the end.”

But his group did not announce various vote totals received by each candidate, only who got the most votes and thus the endorsement.

“This is not a political campaign, and we’re not going to allow the vote counts to be used to embarrass anyone,” he said.

Pat Henry, an EMC member who has paid close attention to the Cobb EMC saga over the years and attended nearly all of the Owners Association’s meetings, said she is disgusted with this week’s vetting and fears “we’ll never be rid of the corruption there.”

“I hope people understand it was rigged by the employees,” she said. “I think the endorsements will be a hindrance to getting good representation on the board, considering what I saw this week.”

Sheriff Neil Warren was one of those who showed up a few minutes late on Tuesday night and was not allowed to vote in Area 2, where his friend Charlie Jones was a candidate. Jones did not get the group’s endorsement.

“Was I mad? No. Disappointed? Yes, but more upset at myself,” he said. “I knew what the process was.”

But Warren said members should take the CEOA with a grain of salt.

“When you have 170,000 members, and this relatively small group ‘endorses’ someone, I think it’s misleading,” Warren said. “If 75 people voted, they ought to say ‘75 members voted to endorse.’ And if a percentage of those were employees, that ought to be disclosed.

“Is it in the best interests of EMC members, what went on Thursday night? I’m not sure that it is.”
Comments
(110)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Cobb Resident
|
March 14, 2012
The members of Cobb EMC need a "forensic audit" of Butch Thompson's very flawed and rigged vetting process - when will this nonsense stop - simply outrageous ! The truth will surface sooner than later !
anonymous
|
March 14, 2012
What's transpired over the past few weeks in horrific. We need the MDJ, Cobb EMC Watch and Take Back Cobb EMC to take a stand against the sellouts at CEOA and provide a forum to vett the board candidates without being railroaded by EMC management and employees. No where else on the planet does management get to use employees as pawns to nominate candidates for the board!
EMC Hostage
|
March 14, 2012
Butch Thompson and David Welden have sold the members out. No question about it.
Get real
|
March 14, 2012
Wait, they spent their own money and hundreds of hours of their time to clean out the EMC with no personal financial gain and even let others vote on a slate instead of just launching one of their own making -- and all you can do is insult them?

How petty and rude.
Concerned Citizen
|
March 14, 2012
Last night did nothing to calm the fears of many Cobb EMC members.

We, the members of Cobb EMC, need to be asking some very serious questions about whether we should be trusting the endorsement of the owners group this time around!!
anonymous
|
March 14, 2012
We can't. Some other body like the MDJ needs to vett these candidates.
My best choices.
|
March 20, 2012
There are several groups now and several diferent endorsements. As for me, I'm going with the combination endorsed by the new group, EMC Customer Alliance. See who they are. They have the best slate of experienced candidates for the owner/customer and they are not the management hand picked slate.

Interesting…
|
March 13, 2012
After attending the vetting sessions last week, I find it interesting that the "least qualified" candidate was selected for Area 3 and 8. With all due respect to Ms. Bodner, both Mr. King and Mr. Hutson were far more qualified to serve in this type of position.

My fear is that, with such a strong showing of EMC employees at these sessions, the process has being tainted by EMC management for their advantage. And, that the efforts of those who brought to light all the corruption amongst EMC management has been severely compromised.
Frauds!
|
March 13, 2012
To "David Park a.k.a David W. co-coordinater CEOA" and your reply to "Had enough!" where you admit to favoring Cobb EMC management and employees over your own CEOA members and Cobb EMC ratepayers by stating "CEOA supports EMC employees and management." Is this why you now allow EMC management and employees to select the board candidates CEOA endorses?

To "Member and Employee" and your response to "irate EMC Member" on 3/11/12 when you admit the EMC Employees voted in block for Chip Nelson's candidates by stating "I was there to assure that people like you are not endorsed."

This combined with Alford's recent admission that they never intended to build Plant Washington, which Nelson the election fixer knew about all the time, is just priceless!!!!

The MDJ needs to now vett theses candidates as the CEOA is to biased now towards a continually corrupt management.

right is right
|
March 13, 2012
"Frauds" your comment is a classic case of turning someone's words into what you think they are saying...lol
Here's some more.
|
March 13, 2012
To: "Had enough" and your long espistle.

I'm shocked, yes shocked that you've had enough. However what I'm shocked about is that you are only now coming forth to sling mud at one of the hero's of the EMC battle. You should read former Congressman Fletcher Thompson's letter in the letter to the editor section today. Tripper stood up for all of us when we didn't know squat. He

and the 5 brave plantiff's took on Brown and all

the money Brown could get from EMC to fight them

for a long, long time. Don't trust him? Ha! I don't trust you, Had Enough!
EMC member 3
|
March 13, 2012
"Here's some more" It just seems people want to keep the pot boiling...Maybe you missed this part of the article from one of the 5 brave plaintiffs..

Still, when asked if the Owners Association had been hijacked, Butch Thompson, who was part of the plaintiff group and hosted the vetting meetings at his construction company’s offices, said “absolutely not.”

“EMC employees have more at stake right now than anybody,” Thompson said. “The ballgame changed when none of the board members sought re-election. I’m not disappointed in any person who’s been endorsed so far. Several people had supporters there with them. Former Sheriff Bill Hutson had an entourage of people there.”

Hutson is a candidate in Area 3 but was not endorsed by the group.

“It’s important for the employees to be involved because their future’s at stake. If we’re going to move forward with a progressive EMC, it’s time for those folks to be recognized as the good employees that they are,” Thompson said. “Did they stack the deck? I just can’t see it.”

anonymous
|
March 13, 2012
I listened to the candidate speeches for Area 9 last Thursday. I found it very disturbing that the endorsed candidate,Sheri Wilbur,a stranger to the Owners Association, said that she was asked to run by "undisclosed sources." Might that be Chip? Where's the transparency? You know that something went terribly awry when a complete unknown was endorsed over Eric Broadwell, a qualified candidate who has been a constant since 2009 and has gained the support of so many.
Sheri Wilburn
|
March 13, 2012
I never said that. I is time to stop the smut politics. I said I was asked to run by Fellow Cobb EMC members who shared my anger with what has happened. To be exact - I was asked to run by 2 members of my Sunday School class and none of us know anyone employed by Cobb EMC. I invite all to go on line and read my resume. I have served a Pres/CEO or Executive Director for 5 different corporations, have considerable experience working with corporate boards, have a master's degree in planning and am a certified economic developer --all experience/skills very relevant to being a contributing board member. The mud politics being engaged in by some persons indicates they are more interested in winning than serving.

Cobb Resident
|
March 14, 2012
My dear lady,

You are nothing more than a pawn of CobbEMC and Butch Thompson's good old boy gang.
Are U kidding me!
|
March 12, 2012
NOT EVEN CLOSE ... So, you know that 2 Plaintiffs

"paid all the bills" for the past 6 years and just how do you know that huh? Maybe you wrote all the checks. As for me, I don't believe you for a minute. Stop commenting on things and in areas you know nothing about.
EqualOpportunity?
|
March 13, 2012
I have learned that there are only two people left running the CEOA. Why would people leave the CEOA? It doesn't sound like the CEOA is the organization it was intended to be.
It's True
|
March 14, 2012
Are you kidding me.... I do know the two plaintiffs. I grew up with thier families and have been around since this entire process started. They did pay all the bills incurred and with no stipulations or expectations to ever be paid back. In fact, Mr. Bo Pounds did so in honor of his late wife Mary Jean, who passed away while all this was taking place. She agreed with and was proud of her husband for taking action and standing up for the people. Both men have been fortunate with thier businessses and were generous enough to do this with no personal gain. To question there integrity and intentions saddens me.
EMC Hostage
|
March 14, 2012
@ It's True: There were actually 6 plaintiffs, not two. The court record shows that all 6 plaintiffs contributed financially to the litigation. Don't believe me, look it up.
Had enough!
|
March 12, 2012
Is Cobb EMC to be a villain until it has been purged of every current employee and policy?

With every acidic article the MDJ runs and every person that buys it at face value, I add another fear into that and wonder to whom Cobb EMC is a vilain: The members or Tripper Sharp?

How dare the CEOA allow employees who are members to attend and then say they are stacking the deck. Do you even know what voting for these endorsements does?

Every single vote for these "endorsements" stacks the deck. Employees who are members have every rights to have their voice heard and add their card to the stack they feel deserves support.

With Dwight and the old board out of the way, CEOA and the MDJ have targeted employees.

Stop it - right now.

The people in customer service, meter reading, marketing, etc. had nothing to do with Dwight or the board and treating them as enemies is not fair to them. They just want to continue drawing a paycheck in economically uncertain times, but current events have some fearing for their jobs though they have done nothing wrong.

Bad enough that Tripper Sharp makes the unethical decision of running for board (yes, suing a company to remove management and then choosing late-game to run for management yourself AFTER saying you would not do so is unethical - can we say personal interest?) but now he's attacking employees who are members and want their voices heard.

I've got a concern: This is Tripper Sharp's arena, so why is he so afraid of the members of Cobb EMC who are employees when he claims he is trying to better the company for the sake of said members? Anyone thinking of voting for him may want to remember this. Do you want to vote for someone that says one thing, then does another? Do you want to vote for someone that becomes fearful of his own arena and starts attacking others? Do you want to vote for someone who had a significant say in the people now on the board and then decided to aim for his own spot?

I hope not. It reminds me of Dwight Brown and the people often called his chosen board members. Do you see a difference? I certainly don't. Many have feared he had a personal stake in this, now there is confirmation. He has a board that he wanted, so what is it he plans to do? What hasn't he told the people following him? Maybe it's nothing, may it's not. I'd want those types of answers before even considering giving him a vote.

He staged a coup and claimed it was only for the benefit of the members. Now he wants power. Why?

As for Pat Henry, I say this: You seek to exclude members because they are employees and thus create your own rigging.

I am sick of this. I am sick of the MDJ constantly slamming Cobb EMC and the employees. I am sick of the acid being spewed wherever possible.

Enough is enough. People have been drawn into this illusion that everything Cobb EMC is evil. I've seen disrespect at marketing events. Completely unprovoked and often uneducated. This to employees that just want a paycheck and to be able to hold their heads high with pride in their work. They were not included in the board's decisions, and were often ignored by the board. But CEOA, the MDJ and their followers have them afraid of mentioning where they work for fear of personal attack simply because of it.

Wake up! Stop letting Tripper Sharp and the rest tell you what to think! Vote for who YOU think is best, not for who the CEOA endorses!

The intentions of Sharp and the CEOA were good (as far as we know) and we can all agree Dwight Brown needed to go. But now things are way out of hand and many people are way out of line. The hatred born of this is staggering, especially in its misdirection. Now they want to have the same influence they just got rid of and start the attack when things don't go their way.

This is alarmingly similar to the previous group with Dwight Brown, but many people just don't seem to care anymore.

So desperate some are for water that you'll drink from any source, be it sewage or seawater, from a tap or from the toilet. And you'll never question the source the water came from.

Question now - later is too late.

Employees who are members have a huge stake in this: They are voting for their upper management AND the people that run the company that supplies their power.

You got a problem with them voting, I'll be more than happy to set you right!
DavidPark
|
March 13, 2012
Please do not confuse Sharp and the CEOA.

CEOA supports EMC employees and management.

Sharp denigrates them, in the MDJ no less.

David W.

Co-coordinator, CEOA
sick of it all
|
March 13, 2012
I think you just hit the nail on the head!
Employee and Member
|
March 12, 2012
TO: MemberOfWhat???

I am a member of Cobb EMC. Boy, do you have a problem. Calm down now...

You seriously need to consider anger management classes.

To answer your question, yes I care about my Cobb EMC bill just like all other members do. I pay my bill just like you do, so that makes me an equal owner with the company. So where do you get off on talking to me like I am a nobody.

I am not sure what you meant about my patronage job??? You may have to explain that one.

Am I a no show, or show no work employee??? What the heck??

While you are in anger management classes you might want to consider shock therapy too.

I would be more than happy to address your questions if you could kindly tell me what you are talking about.

Duhhh!!!!!!
Second Class Member?
|
March 12, 2012
As a long time salaried employee of Cobb EMC I have followed along with this discussion and others. If I read these comments as they are intended I take it I am allowed to be either an employee or a voting member but I can't be both? I am not allowed to have an opinion on the direction the company so many of us have dedicated our lives to seeing succeed? I am disgusted by the suggestion that me or my coworkers are pawns of management or that our work is not characterized by anything other than quality of the product and service we all pay for. I have watched our employees leave home for literally months at a time to help people in other states. I have personally worked ice storms and other high risk events, leaving my family at home, to make sure everyone's power was on. The very idea that we shouldn't express our opinions, listen to others in a vetting process and cast our votes is an insult. I have watched our entire upper management replaced in a very short time. Like most people I want this fixed but the insults, the accusations and the maligning have got to stop. Have a spirited discussion and in the end, show up and vote but please stop this. In the meantime please accept that Cobb has undergone profound change and has done so honestly and with integrity. Also remember that our families read this and though you can hide your insults and innuendo behind an anonymous name, our employees proudly wear our name on our shirts.
Old Cobb EMC member
|
March 12, 2012
My ONLY requirements for the new Cobb EMC board of directors are: Smart, experienced, young and good looking. So far have we members done well.

I give us an A.
Know it!
|
March 12, 2012
Face it Heard It you are a plant with bad soil.

Why can I say this...? Because you are so bad.

You have no facts, no smarts and each plant you

put down is so without knowledge. Also, please don't talk about thing you don't have a clue about or, first hand knowledge. After all, you are not a Board Member, a candidate, a plantiff,

or anyone close to the CEOA. Bummer!
tell_the_truth
|
March 12, 2012
As one of the brave EMC members who held the co-op accountable in the 2007 lawsuit, at personal expense, Tripper has more credibility than any other candidate. None of the candidates know better than he does "where the bodies are buried" at Cobb EMC. I for one would like to know what he knows, but can't share due to legal constraints...but we'll never find out if we don't elect him.
Heard It
|
March 12, 2012
So he has legal constraints now, but if he is elected he doesn't?????? There were more than one plaintiff(s), thus there are several resourses that can be tapped if needed. This is why everyone supports a forensic audit that should not be tainted by either plaintiffs or previous board members. This is not rocket science. If the new board is made up of plaintiffs then everything the reform groups have done will be in vain.
Concerned Reformer
|
March 12, 2012
Heard It. We want a board full of reformers, not replacements hand selected by the CobbEMC managements. A forensic audit NOT overseen by reformers won't be worth the paper it was printed on. We need someone who can guide us to where all the skeletons are hiding and not someone who will stand infront of the closet and say 'Nothing here!'
Not even close
|
March 12, 2012
You couldn't be more wrong. Butch and Bo paid all the bills (until the settlement), not Tripper. Moreover, the attorney in the case is on record saying there is nothing about the case that wasn' in the final complaint paperwork (which is all public). Tripper brings nothing special to the table except the baggage of broken promises and a clear lack of qualifications.

His appeal to "special knowledge" is exactly because there is nothing to recommend him.
Pat H
|
March 12, 2012
There will never be any oversight of this EMC or any other EMC as long as Don Parsons remains in office as head of the Utility committee. He is sitting on legislation that will bring the EMC under control of the PSC but the lobbyist hired by the EMC (whom we pay for in our electric bills) courts him to hold back this bill. Parsons finally has a wonderful challenger who promises integrity in office (Joellen Smith).

I disagree about the employees being honest, especially the administrative personnel. They were privilege to all correspondence and emails with Brown, Raydar, Alford, etc. There is whistleblower protection yet not ONE employee ever went to the GBI. I would never have compromised integrity and would be going to work wearing a wire.

Note to all. I sent an email to a new elected Board member (in private) and received an answer from Sam Kelly. He said the Board member would not have known the answer. Apparently he thinks we are all that stupid. Kelly and Nelson need to go.
Cobb Resident
|
March 12, 2012
Amen, Nelson, Kelly and many others need to be history on by the end of May !
In reply to heard it
|
March 12, 2012
Obviously you don't know Brackin and Sharp. They were smart and brave enough to take a stand 6 years ago to go against the Brown EMC and his Board of Directors. They stood up and were sued for it. Now, they have something to show for their courage and how about you? You don't even know them personally. I doubt you've done any real work on this. But you can show you back side and act smart when you've "read the news. Ever apologized for being a dummy? Oh, I'm sorry,

you may be a nice but misguided person.
Heard It
|
March 12, 2012
I have never read any positive quotes from Brackin or Sharpe. Everything that goes on is wrong and needs fixing. They are to CEOA what the old board members were to Cobb EMC. Start looking at the good in things - - how many people have gotten involved in the process -- how many highly qualified people are seeking positions on the board.All of the reform groups have done a great job. Stay positive and don't let a few members with baggage give you a bad reputation.
Employee's Wife
|
March 12, 2012
Thank you! If everyone looks carefully at each candidate and votes who they feel can lead without bias, is qualified and willing to invest what is necessary then places their vote with that candidate - problem solved.
Concerned Reformer
|
March 12, 2012
Heard It. The old board members ruled CObbEMC for decades and stole millions. Don't tarnish Brackin or Sharpe with your diatribe. When a candidate only applies a week or so before the deadline, rarely or never appears before groups of members and reformers, how do you know they're qualified?

Oh, you just take Kelly's and Nelson's word. That's reassuring.
Just an employee
|
March 12, 2012
Why are you people attacking us employees? You're spewing hatrid at the wrong people. We got screwed just like everybody else during the Dwight regime. You actually don't know the half of it. We're now under a different type of 'command' that's worse in a way. Instead of a thief running the show we have egomaniacs in charge. A few upper managements have been placed in positions now that they were handed by kissing up. It's sad when truly qualified employees get pushed aside so the good ol' boy gang can strut around 'running' the place. I hope one day the old CEMC will return.
Harry A
|
March 12, 2012
I believe it is time for fresh ideas, fresh faces and a fresh approach. You HIRE outside accountants and lawyers to report to you. If you can’t read or understand a Profit and Loss they provide the answers. You being an accountant, lawyer, or public relations person is immaterial as YOU aren’t the one doing the internal investigation. Otherwise you are going beyond the scope of being a Board Director.

The working employees of Cobb EMC are a bright spot in all of this. They have continued to work hard and provide services in a timely and thoroughly professional manner. My hat is off to them and a heartfelt thanks as well.

I reiterate again that I want a youthful, energetic and dynamic group on the Board of Directors each one having PROVEN their long term commitment to change and benefit Cobb EMC owner/members.

Kidding, right?
|
March 12, 2012
Harry A, you are kidding right? The worst thing you can do is elect unqualified people to the Board (like Tripper and some of the others). Board members need enough experience and enough knowledge of accounting, law, etc. to 1) ask good question and 2) recognize when something isn't right. Being "youthful, energetic, and dynamic" are qualifications for a cheerleader -- not a director of a large corporation. As for "PROVEN" long-term commitment, your earlier list of candidates that meet your approval includes people who showed up just weeks before the endorsement. Though, in at least one case, Underwood, he is the better candidate.

Too much vitriol and too little wisdom here.
EqualOpportunity?
|
March 12, 2012
Just an Employee. I bet a new board and not a board hand picked by managment would really help that situation. An involved board would require management to report their actions and I hope would be available to the employees for private discussions.

If we, the members, could help align desired behavior to management's pay we might get somewhere. But we don't get a voice most of the time.
Concerned Reformer
|
March 12, 2012
No one has ever attacked the hourly employee of CobbEMC that is really doing the work. I'll even extend that benefit of the doubt to the first line supervisors. I will excuse their lack of whistle blowing to a genuine fear of their own jobs.

However, I draw no distinction to the executives and the long-term upper management team. They knew what was going on, knew it was wrong and are now trying to get 'friendly' faces on the board to continue their past activities. They just hope to be as successfully greedy as Chip Nelson and Dwight Brown are.
Emc member owner
|
March 12, 2012
I believe we may have some candidates that are sore losers! My guess is that now they will try and discredit the owners association for their own personal reasons that being said who truly has a hidden agenda! The owners association has had our best interest from the beginning!
Concerned Reformer
|
March 12, 2012
The compalaints are comming from employees, owners and candidates alike. Everyone that has made it plain from the start that open and fair elections were the goal have recognized that what is going on at the owners association is neither.

Chip Nelson and Sam Kelly have made it equally plain from the beginning that status quo is what their agenda is. Hand picking the board successors is their way of winning.
To Emc member owner
|
March 12, 2012
You are right. Just look at the first four board members the CEOA endorsed. They got Plant Washington killed, have the minutes of board meetings now posted, have started working on the bylaws and more.

CEOA's track record in picking board members is great. They don't deserve this nonsense.
For Real
|
March 11, 2012
This whole process is a joke. I went to both meetings last week after seeing in the AJC and MDJ that the meetings were being held and open to all EMC members. Neither article mentioned they were open to EMC employees, CEOA members, or any other group. I am guessing the CEOA opened the meeting up to all EMC members since they had a former board member running thus they couldn't look bias if it was closed to their membership only since they filed a derivative suit for no personal gain. Now,I'm reading where Mr. Sharpe is bad mouthing a system he helped to create. WOW!

After looking at his qualifications compared to the others in his area, I would be crying too! There were candidates that did not get the endorsement of CEOA, who appear better qualified than this Sharpe guy.
concerned reformer
|
March 12, 2012
Board Members don't run the Cobb EMC, they only hire the ones that do. They need to be curious, ask hard questions and not be bullied and bribed like the previous bunch of crooks.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides