School board map upsets NE Cobb residents
by Lindsay Field
lfield@mdjonline.com
Feb 29, 2012 | 3891 views | 13 13 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
JoEllen Smith, standing,  spoke to a crowd of about 50 people at Mountain View Community Center in east Cobb Tuesday about the Cobb County School District's reapportionment map that Cobb legislators will vote on within the next two weeks. <br> Photo by Lindsay Field
JoEllen Smith, standing, spoke to a crowd of about 50 people at Mountain View Community Center in east Cobb Tuesday about the Cobb County School District's reapportionment map that Cobb legislators will vote on within the next two weeks.
Photo by Lindsay Field
slideshow
MARIETTA — A northeast Cobb woman says her family is already split between two school board members, and a Cobb school district reapportionment map circulating via email would add a third to the mix, she said during a town hall attended by about 50 people Tuesday.

“All the schools currently feed into one another,” said Jennifer Modi, who lives near East Piedmont Road in Woodstream Blackjack Hills subdivision off Allgood Road. “The representatives will follow your child from elementary school all the way through high school. I know that … you have some (attendance zones) that it’s not going to work out perfectly, but as much as it can, they should try to do that.”

Modi lives in school board Chair Scott Sweeney’s post, but her children attend Kincaid Elementary and Simpson Middle, which are in David Banks’ post. Under the circulating map, Simpson would be represented by Kathleen Angelucci.

JoEllen Smith, who plans to run for the state Representative seat held by Don Parsons (R-northeast Cobb), called the town hall at the Mountain View Community Center off Sandy Plains Road so constituents could voice their opinions on a reapportionment map that some, like Modi, are unhappy with.

The map, which is changing because of new Census numbers, affects who residents will vote for, not which schools students will attend. The maps are redrawn every 10 years to keep the districts balanced.

The map that drew attendees to the meeting was drawn up by Earl Ehrhart (R-Powder Springs), who says he is working on a new map based on community input. The local legislators will meet Wednesday morning to “roll out” the map that will be voted on before they adjourn in the next 14 days.

Smith said she called the meeting last night because she doesn’t feel like the community had any input into the reapportionment map. She said she invited Cobb delegates to the meeting, but none of them attended.

“The larger of the issues is that it was done without public input. I believe in transparency and openness and trying to bring this (process) out in the open and to the public,” Smith said. “This map is the one we’re going to have to live with.”

She recommended those in attendance contact each legislator personally and tell them what they do or don’t like about the map.

“Give them the problem back in their lap,” she said. “They are not legally bound to have open meetings (about the map) but they moved along without asking our opinions. This is our district, these are our seats — We loan them the power. I want them asking your opinion, your permission.”

Modi said she has already emailed two of her representatives but hasn’t heard back from them. She did not say specifically whom she contacted.

“I am quite irritated … in the past when I’ve contacted them about things you get an automated email back or a fresh email back and this time, nothing, so I think I’m actually going to call,” she said. “I’m a social worker, so I know how to advocate.”

Cobb resident Kristen Dressel said voters must contact their legislators to have any hope of representation.

“They will pass it if we don’t complain. They have done this in private. They have not gotten public input. They have not taken the recommendations of our school board. They have done it without any consideration of what our needs are … if we don’t contact our representatives and b—— like crazy about this, they’re going to pass it and it’s going to be in place for 10 years. That’s why we’re here, to make sure everyone understands. This is a problem and unless they hear from us, they’re going to think it’s OK,” she said.

Smith said Dressel lives in the Shallowford Falls area in northeast Cobb.

Banks also advised those in attendance to contact their representatives and senators.

He is the only board member in August who did not favor the map that was approved by the board majority, going so far as to present his own map to the delegation.

“This map has a lot of flaws,” Banks said regarding Ehrhart’s map. “I’m not trying to get in a battle with legislators … I think it’s wrong and very destructive to the community.”

After the meeting, Ehrhart said map that has been circulating for the past week is not the final map, but he has received numerous emails from people who aren’t happy with it.

“The ones they’ve seen in the email blasts … they don’t like it,” he said. “I’ve taken a great deal of community input into this one though.”
Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Cobb Taxpayer
|
March 01, 2012
This meeting was nothing more than a political agenda as they both are running for office. Banks is never happy about anything. If you attended the meeting at the Mtn Park Center by Rogers and Hill, Mrs. Smith stood throughout the meeting and kept interjecting her comments as if she was part of the legislative panel. People in the audience has to ask, "who are you?" in which she replied, I am J.S. and I am running for your House District. She said this at least 3 or more times. She has done this at other events in Cobb County. Thankfully she won't be my representative - IF she wins.

Given how she is "running" her campaign and being so pushy, I don't blame anyone for not responding to her. This should be investigated as a campaign violation. Banks will be voted out, so he is really not an issue, hopefully someone else will replace Don Parsons.
ugagrad
|
March 01, 2012
From what I understand, this meeting was in violation of some campaigning issues. Joellen used this meeting as a vehicle for campaigning and of course Banks will do anything to bolster his chances for getting re-elected. According to insiders, Banks is not happy with the new calendar because it puts him into schools that don't have the Republican base. So sorry David. But I for one am thrilled that he would be moved from my district, as are many other people I have spoken to.
Cobb Mom
|
February 29, 2012
I disagree with some of those posting who claim JoEllen Smith responded prematurely. With only fourteen days until a map is voted on, how long should our community wait to voice our opinion. I've worked with JoEllen Smith on many projects in the past both regarding the PTA and advocacy for Operation Stop Arm and she has always been very commited to gathering many opinions and facts about an issue and working towards the best solution possible.
Mom of Two
|
February 29, 2012
As they say, the devil is in the details. Did anyone ask JoEllen when she invited the reps to the meeting? Or why she was having a meeting without those involved able to attend or why she was having the meeting knowing that Matt Dollar and others were still working on maps? I did contact my reps regarding the meeting to ask why they were not attending, I received a very different story from the one that JoEllen wants to tell. Not only that, Matt Dollar responded immediately. David Banks has yet to respond to any email I've sent him - it's been a year by the way. Seems to me, this meeting was called prematurely without all the details necessary.
True Dat
|
February 29, 2012
You are absolutely correct! JoEllen Smith and David Banks are running campaigns; they will do anything to pander hoping to pick up votes.

This is so sad.
JoEllen Smith
|
February 29, 2012
Please do kindly share your email from Rep. Dollar, I would be most interested. I have a copy of each correspondence I had with each representative in this area. I emailed them and I followed up with either a phone call or, in Rep. Dollar's case, since he doesn't list his cell phone number, I sent a second invite via his FaceBook account. I received no response at all from any representative. In addition, many attendees at the meeting mentioned that they had not received answers from the representatives in the NE Cobb area in regard to these maps. Our reps in this area are generally quite responsive so we were all quite disappointed. Yes the legislature is in session but it does end at a reasonable hour each evening. Also, the main point, and this was the main point of the entire meeting, if this map had been done with openness, transparency and public input to begin with, the public would not have been left in the dark with so many questions in the 11th hour. Thank you.
Cobb voter
|
March 01, 2012
Mrs. Smith, given the short notice of your "political" event, why do you feel any representative should have accepted your invitation? David Banks sent out an e-mail announcing the meeting earlier in the day, not much of a notice. IF you have a campaign manager, you might want to find a new one - soon!!!!!
ProJour
|
February 29, 2012
I trust nothing involving Earl Ehrhart - isn't he the same guy who pushed through legislation prohibiting the use of race as a factor in school redistricting - but ONLY as it relates to CCSD - because it involved the high school in his district? Local control indeed. Beware!
Samuel Adams
|
March 01, 2012
Earl came down on the same side in that issue that the United States Supreme Court did just a couple months later. The bureaucrats in our school district were wrong on that, the same way they've been wrong on so many other things. Too bad there was never a follow up news story on it.

ProJour, I don't blame you for being misled on that issue. It was one the liberals didn't want highlighted because it showed their hypocrisy, so the media did not see fit to print anything about it -- either on the national level or the local level.
Connie J
|
February 29, 2012
I am so glad to see people getting involved in this issue. I hope many more will contact their legislators and urge them to adopt the map the school board put together.
anonymous
|
February 29, 2012
I've always voted for one board member and our schools were represented by another. You're right, they could care less if you don't live in their district. The School board created a map that respected attendance zones. Just make the legislators follow the map that the Legislators asked the school board to do in the first place. It was done in a cooperative way, which we all know is pretty tough for the CCSB to pull off.
anonymous
|
February 29, 2012
Here's your sign: when you draw a map for the sole purpose of increasing Republican School Board Members, you're not going to worry much about children, attendance zones, or a voter's right to due representation.

This is why we need non-partisian school board seats, as well as an independent commission drawing the reapportionment maps.
Use the CCSB Map
|
February 29, 2012
Anonymous - there are currently 2 Democrats and 5 Republicans on the CCSB. With the map proposed by the Cobb Delegation, there will still be 2 Democrats and 5 Republicans. However, I definitely prefer the CCSB map as it does a much better job of keeping feeder patterns together. The Cobb Delegation map was hastily put together by individuals unfamiliar with the CCSD and our schools. The Cobb Delegation needs to work to secure funding for Cobb's public schools and leave the map to the school board.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides