Things haven’t quite worked out that way.
Dr. Hinojosa has now been here roughly eight months and regrettably has little to show for his efforts aside from a shuffling of his top brass and responsibilities in order to allow him more time to visit schools each Wednesday.
And it has come to light in the past several weeks that Hinojosa was quietly expending a great deal of effort on a pair of initiatives that the board turned out not to want — his proposed hiring of 50 Teach For America teachers for underperforming schools in south Cobb; and his support for a start-up charter school in south Cobb being pushed hard by board Vice Chairman David Morgan and his wife, state Rep. Alisha Thomas Morgan (D-Austell).
As it turned out, the majority of the board was against hiring the Teach For America rookie teachers in a budget climate in which the board would simultaneously be losing 350 experienced teachers through attrition. That outcome should have been a no-brainer for Hinojosa to predict before he filled out the two applications for $400,000 in federal Race to the Top funds for the program. And let’s not forget that the board had never publicly discussed whether to apply for Race to the Top funds.
And the board was blindsided by the news that Hinojosa and system staff had been working with Morgan on the proposed charter school start-up. State law allows school systems to assist “conversion” charters, but not start-ups. Hinojosa had not apprised the board of the system’s efforts on behalf of Morgan. And Morgan had cast the deciding vote last year against what would have been a competing charter school serving the same area — a vote that essentially doomed the other school, and a vote that represented a staggering, but ignored, conflict of interest for Morgan.
Now both the TFA and Morgan’s charter school plans are down the tubes. But that’s what happens when a superintendent keeps his board and the public in the dark about what he’s up to.
Yes, there were, but he never learned them because he continued to keep important information from his board and the public.
And his board never learned its lesson because it continued to let Sanderson lead it by the nose and keep hiding key information.
The board should be discussing the matter at tonight’s meeting, but is prohibited from doing so by its arcane rules about how items are added to the agenda. But it will be interesting to see if the current school board at its meeting next month discusses Hinojosa’s “hide the ball” tactics, or whether members swallow their pride and decide to let him have his way with them.
In corporate America such a chief executive would be quickly brought to heel by his board for such actions. But if history holds, the Cobb board will meekly put up with it, not saying a word.
And if that happens, who can blame Hinojosa if he takes that as a green light to keep on keeping his board and the public in the dark?
But Hinojosa and the board bring to mind a man starving to death while sitting on a ham sandwich. That is, this community is begging for a strong leader to take charge of the system and turn its focus to improving student achievement. The soil is right for moving this system ahead dramatically, especially after a “lost decade” spent fighting political battles and eight months of the Hinojosa regime with nothing to show for it.
Are Hinojosa and the board finally ready to step up to the plate? Is he ready to carry out the pledges he made during the hiring process? And is the majority of the board that ran as “reformers” finally going to start voting that way? This system cannot afford another lost decade, or even another lost eight months.











Follow us on Twitter!
I am not anti-Hinojosa. I think it's a great thing he is visiting the schools, and despite the board's efforts, I think the visits should be unannounced. (Come on now, we all know of certain retired-in-place principals who ease into the building between 9 and 10 on a regular basis.) What I do object to is the "behind closed doors" process of getting things done. We should have learned these lessons by now. Dr. Hinojosa would be well served not to take any more meetings with the flaks from the chamber and he will be just fine.
There has been turmoil between the Superintendent, the School Board, the public and the spin MDJ puts on it all - for far past long enough, covering numerable boards and numerable Superintendents. Only lawyers can create this kind of mess. Is there some way to get rid of the lawyers advising the Cobb County School System and the Cobb County School Board?
He asks that contributions be made to "David Banks for Schools."
GA has this definition; "A candidate committee is a campaign committee for a candidate that accepts contributions or makes expenditures designed to bring about the nomination or election of that candidate to any elected office."
A candidate must register its committee with the Commission prior to accepting any contributions.
Funny thing; The Georgia Government TRANSPARENCY and Campaign Finance Commission website shows no record of "David Banks for Schools."
By the way Mr. Banks - It's "Principals" who lead schools, not "Principles." Spell check only gets one so far.
Does that word now mean - layoffs, staff reduction? The CCSD will siply not renew contracts and say nothing other than "sevral chose to retire"
As for Hinojosa himself, I did some research regarding his past performance in Dallas and I was not impressed. Knew this guy was not the best hire. The only question for me is WHEN will the board wake up and decide to jettison him?
However it is noted, the Cobb County School District is not 'Corporate America'. Nor is there is a secluded board room, on the 15th floor, where such a message can be delivered in private. To throw your (CEO) superintendent under the bus and reprimand him in public would result in a much weaker organization and seriously weaken his leadership. Thus his ability to reform the school system and make the massive changes needed would be severely harmed.
The superintendent’s public admission of not following proper protocol should be seen as an acknowledgement that the board’s message was loudly heard. Not in a million years, would the previous superintendent ever admit that he had made a mistake. Therefore, his statement of culpability should be seen as the words of a leader who clearly understands the impact of his actions – never to be repeated.
Actually, a closer inspection of the facts can offer a different interpretation. Simply, the superintendent worked with one of his seven bosses, David Morgan. In fact, vice chairman, Mr. Morgan and his state representative wife, Mrs. Morgan appears to put their own interests above those of the children and taxpayers of Cobb County.
Instead of a public flogging of the superintendent, it is incumbent upon Mr. Morgan to explain why he cast a vote to get rid of a competing charter school and privately push his day time job of promoting TFA and other alternate educational delivery models.
In addition, Mr. David Morgan and his wife, state Rep. Alisha Thomas Morgan (D-Austell) should have the knowledge to understand their actions are not only dangerously close to unethical but also promotes an illegal (creation of a charter school by the board of education) policy.
I hope the elderly and more experienced board members of Ms. Crowder-Eagle and her pal, David Banks are aggressive in their treatment and questioning of Mr. Morgan's vote which has the clear appearance of a conflict of interest. (This would give Mr. Morgan the added advantage of practing answering tough questions, as members of the South Cobb community consider "lawyering up").
Or prehaps these two board retirees will try to discover why Mr. Morgan would seek to fire 50 experienced teachers in order to make room for 50 rookie teachers.
I would not hold my breath waiting for this to occur.
Is your name really Hinojosa?? Sure sounds like it.
As you say, Mableton has met maybe one of dozens of its commitments in the years that it has been open - thus, it was closed and will stay closed. It is the public that was paying for it - under the condition that it met its commitments.
If you want a school that isn't required to meet requirements associated with receiving public funding - send your kids to a private school
I have been to Mableton Charter. My children were accepted there and Smyrna. Chose to enroll them in Smyrna. Pulled them out of Smyrna (as dozens and dozens of other parents have at both Mableton and Smyrna of the past few years)- when it was clear that it would be a long time before the school would be living up to its commitments.
Finally, I need for people like you to realize the FACTS - IIAM received public funds based on a promise to meet a number of specific commitments - you did not come close to meeting the commitments - you have no one to blame but yourselves (by you I mean the IIAM board/those who elected the board/Imagine). You don't meet your commitments - you lose your choice.