Are Hinojosa, board ever going to ... step up to the plate
Feb 23, 2012 | 2453 views | 21 21 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DR. MICHAEL HINOJOSA brought high expectations with him when he arrived from Dallas, Texas last summer to become superintendent of the Cobb County School District. It was hoped that the hiring of an “outsider” with no previous ties the system — and no ties to its many past and ongoing controversies — would represent a fresh start for the system, giving the school board and public a chance to hit the “reset” button, so to speak.

Things haven’t quite worked out that way.

Dr. Hinojosa has now been here roughly eight months and regrettably has little to show for his efforts aside from a shuffling of his top brass and responsibilities in order to allow him more time to visit schools each Wednesday.

And it has come to light in the past several weeks that Hinojosa was quietly expending a great deal of effort on a pair of initiatives that the board turned out not to want — his proposed hiring of 50 Teach For America teachers for underperforming schools in south Cobb; and his support for a start-up charter school in south Cobb being pushed hard by board Vice Chairman David Morgan and his wife, state Rep. Alisha Thomas Morgan (D-Austell).

As it turned out, the majority of the board was against hiring the Teach For America rookie teachers in a budget climate in which the board would simultaneously be losing 350 experienced teachers through attrition. That outcome should have been a no-brainer for Hinojosa to predict before he filled out the two applications for $400,000 in federal Race to the Top funds for the program. And let’s not forget that the board had never publicly discussed whether to apply for Race to the Top funds.

And the board was blindsided by the news that Hinojosa and system staff had been working with Morgan on the proposed charter school start-up. State law allows school systems to assist “conversion” charters, but not start-ups. Hinojosa had not apprised the board of the system’s efforts on behalf of Morgan. And Morgan had cast the deciding vote last year against what would have been a competing charter school serving the same area — a vote that essentially doomed the other school, and a vote that represented a staggering, but ignored, conflict of interest for Morgan.

Now both the TFA and Morgan’s charter school plans are down the tubes. But that’s what happens when a superintendent keeps his board and the public in the dark about what he’s up to.

***
THE QUESTION NOW is what the board plans to do. You’ll recall a similar incident several years ago when then-Superintendent Fred Sanderson picked as principal for North Cobb High School a middle-school principal who was the subject of a sexual harassment investigation — and how Sanderson didn’t say a word about the allegations or the investigation to his board when recommending the man for promotion. After being scolded by an ensuing grand jury investigation of the matter, Sanderson’s only comment was that there were “lessons to be learned.”

Yes, there were, but he never learned them because he continued to keep important information from his board and the public.

And his board never learned its lesson because it continued to let Sanderson lead it by the nose and keep hiding key information.

The board should be discussing the matter at tonight’s meeting, but is prohibited from doing so by its arcane rules about how items are added to the agenda. But it will be interesting to see if the current school board at its meeting next month discusses Hinojosa’s “hide the ball” tactics, or whether members swallow their pride and decide to let him have his way with them.

In corporate America such a chief executive would be quickly brought to heel by his board for such actions. But if history holds, the Cobb board will meekly put up with it, not saying a word.

And if that happens, who can blame Hinojosa if he takes that as a green light to keep on keeping his board and the public in the dark?

***
IT WAS HOPED that Hinojosa would be a breath of fresh air for the system. It was hoped that he would be responsive to the public and to the board, rather than try to dominate it like his recent predecessors in that job. And there’s still time for Hinojosa to change his methods and leverage the good will many still hold for him. Most Cobb Countians, after all, want our school superintendent to succeed.

But Hinojosa and the board bring to mind a man starving to death while sitting on a ham sandwich. That is, this community is begging for a strong leader to take charge of the system and turn its focus to improving student achievement. The soil is right for moving this system ahead dramatically, especially after a “lost decade” spent fighting political battles and eight months of the Hinojosa regime with nothing to show for it.

Are Hinojosa and the board finally ready to step up to the plate? Is he ready to carry out the pledges he made during the hiring process? And is the majority of the board that ran as “reformers” finally going to start voting that way? This system cannot afford another lost decade, or even another lost eight months.



Comments
(21)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Morgan Should Go
|
February 23, 2012
This deal with Morgan and his wife is Grand Jury material if ever there was. Mr. Morgan should preserve some of his reputation, say he was wrong, and resign. Moving along.......
Just a thought.....
|
February 23, 2012
Perhaps the voters in Mr. Morgan's post should consider a recall effort. It certainly worked to convince the Rev. Dr. Crooks to get out of the way once he realized people had not handed him absolute authority. (Of course, did we ever find out how much the CCSB had to pay to settle his legal bills?)

I am not anti-Hinojosa. I think it's a great thing he is visiting the schools, and despite the board's efforts, I think the visits should be unannounced. (Come on now, we all know of certain retired-in-place principals who ease into the building between 9 and 10 on a regular basis.) What I do object to is the "behind closed doors" process of getting things done. We should have learned these lessons by now. Dr. Hinojosa would be well served not to take any more meetings with the flaks from the chamber and he will be just fine.
Musfat
|
February 23, 2012
Legal fees were a little over $41,000. Crooks was reimbursed about $25,000.
Jim Stoll
|
February 23, 2012
Long before the Cobb County School Board can decide to "Step Up To The Plate", it must be determined who really manages the agenda of the board, or even if they have one. The hiring of Hinojosa on the run, and the actions that have taken place since then have convinced me that someone other than the board is really running the show. Do we really have board meetings or do we have a puppet show every now and then to keep the natives from getting restless? We pay a law firm, who apparently doesn't understand the rule of law pertaining to meetings of public bodies a million dollars per year to give the board advice. The superintendent apparently doesn't believe he has to get permission from the board to do anything. All that's left for the taxpayers and parents to do is to try to figure out who's doing what to who and who's getting the money. In the meantime, the children keep paying the bill, as they twist slowly in the wind.
Maatf
|
February 23, 2012
The CCSB gets in trouble when it doesn't follow the rules and gets in trouble when it does. This time they didn't illegally add something at the last minute to the agenda. This paper has flogged the CCSB when they did illegally add something at the last minute to the agenda.

There has been turmoil between the Superintendent, the School Board, the public and the spin MDJ puts on it all - for far past long enough, covering numerable boards and numerable Superintendents. Only lawyers can create this kind of mess. Is there some way to get rid of the lawyers advising the Cobb County School System and the Cobb County School Board?

Ehtics Watcher
|
February 23, 2012
Received another unsolicited, vile Banks' Grapevine today announcing his re-election campaign. A major theme is TRANSPARENCY and special interests.

He asks that contributions be made to "David Banks for Schools."

GA has this definition; "A candidate committee is a campaign committee for a candidate that accepts contributions or makes expenditures designed to bring about the nomination or election of that candidate to any elected office."

A candidate must register its committee with the Commission prior to accepting any contributions.

Funny thing; The Georgia Government TRANSPARENCY and Campaign Finance Commission website shows no record of "David Banks for Schools."

By the way Mr. Banks - It's "Principals" who lead schools, not "Principles." Spell check only gets one so far.
ProJour
|
February 23, 2012
Unless and until the CCSD Superintendent deigns to genuflect before the MDJ and discuss/get approval on all major initiatives - like the Marietta City Schools superintendent does - it won't matter WHO holds the seat, he/she will never succeed. And because this comment is critical of the paper, it probably won't receive "moderator approval."
my thoughts
|
February 23, 2012
Has there ever been a county super the MDJ supported in 30 years? It seems they look for ways to disagree with whoever is in authority. Whatever it takes to sell newspapers, I guess, which is a sad state of affairs.
dead on!
|
February 23, 2012
this comment is dead on, its called pandering and that is exactly why the MCS board and super stay out of the line of fire, its no secret the MDJ is running things there and they wish they were running things in ccsd but since they can't they character assassinate all in their way
Attrition?
|
February 23, 2012
"As it turned out, the majority of the board was against hiring the Teach For America rookie teachers in a budget climate in which the board would simultaneously be losing 350 experienced teachers through attrition."

Does that word now mean - layoffs, staff reduction? The CCSD will siply not renew contracts and say nothing other than "sevral chose to retire"
Not a Hinojosa Fan
|
February 23, 2012
Thought this was a good editorial. Just wish they would have mentioned the fact that Hinojosa also gave some central office employees pay raises while sucking more money from teachers. That was worth noting.

As for Hinojosa himself, I did some research regarding his past performance in Dallas and I was not impressed. Knew this guy was not the best hire. The only question for me is WHEN will the board wake up and decide to jettison him?
Arcane?
|
February 23, 2012
I'm confused, aren't those "arcane rules" regarding the agenda designed to protect the public by allowing advance notice of what is to be discussed? And doesn't the MDJ regularly criticize the school board for not doing everything by the book in an open manner? I seem to recall a certain cell tower fiasco from a couple years ago that involved a late addition to the agenda. So which is it? Flexible or advance notice?
anonymous
|
February 23, 2012
In corporate America, there would be a strongly worded reminder to a CEO regarding his/her role. Thus I agree with some of the comments in the editorial.



However it is noted, the Cobb County School District is not 'Corporate America'. Nor is there is a secluded board room, on the 15th floor, where such a message can be delivered in private. To throw your (CEO) superintendent under the bus and reprimand him in public would result in a much weaker organization and seriously weaken his leadership. Thus his ability to reform the school system and make the massive changes needed would be severely harmed.

The superintendent’s public admission of not following proper protocol should be seen as an acknowledgement that the board’s message was loudly heard. Not in a million years, would the previous superintendent ever admit that he had made a mistake. Therefore, his statement of culpability should be seen as the words of a leader who clearly understands the impact of his actions – never to be repeated.

Actually, a closer inspection of the facts can offer a different interpretation. Simply, the superintendent worked with one of his seven bosses, David Morgan. In fact, vice chairman, Mr. Morgan and his state representative wife, Mrs. Morgan appears to put their own interests above those of the children and taxpayers of Cobb County.

Instead of a public flogging of the superintendent, it is incumbent upon Mr. Morgan to explain why he cast a vote to get rid of a competing charter school and privately push his day time job of promoting TFA and other alternate educational delivery models.

In addition, Mr. David Morgan and his wife, state Rep. Alisha Thomas Morgan (D-Austell) should have the knowledge to understand their actions are not only dangerously close to unethical but also promotes an illegal (creation of a charter school by the board of education) policy.

I hope the elderly and more experienced board members of Ms. Crowder-Eagle and her pal, David Banks are aggressive in their treatment and questioning of Mr. Morgan's vote which has the clear appearance of a conflict of interest. (This would give Mr. Morgan the added advantage of practing answering tough questions, as members of the South Cobb community consider "lawyering up").

Or prehaps these two board retirees will try to discover why Mr. Morgan would seek to fire 50 experienced teachers in order to make room for 50 rookie teachers.

I would not hold my breath waiting for this to occur.

Hey you....
|
February 23, 2012
Hey, Anonymous,

Is your name really Hinojosa?? Sure sounds like it.

IIAM Parent
|
February 23, 2012
The concern I have now is that the board is not willing to save face by reconsidering the vote to close the IIAM. Therefore, it appears that they are doing the same thing that they have done in the past. At what point does the board take into consideration the 500 students who still remain at IIAM and the 60 employees who will be displaced due to the actions of David Morgan and Dr. Hinojosa. There are reasons why these parents did not choose to attend public schools and now it is being enforced on them unfairly. I need the Board to stand up and do what is right. Reconsider the vote and allow Mableton Charter school the opportunity to make up for the deficiencies which they continue to hold on too from the first day the school opened. Now that the STEM school is down the drain, why not keep a school that is running near or better than the surrounding public schools OPEN!!! All we as the parents of IIAM ask is that the BOARD give us a chance and do what is right.
yawn1
|
February 23, 2012
Charter schools are public schools.

As you say, Mableton has met maybe one of dozens of its commitments in the years that it has been open - thus, it was closed and will stay closed. It is the public that was paying for it - under the condition that it met its commitments.

If you want a school that isn't required to meet requirements associated with receiving public funding - send your kids to a private school
IIAM Parent
|
February 23, 2012
Once again, this is where your understanding of a charter school is not true. Yes, charter school receives money from public schools but we do not receive all of the funds that are given to the "public" school. If parents could afford private schools, they would send them there instead of to the public school. Once again, have you visited Mableton charter...has your child attended Mableton in the last few years? Or are you basing your information on what you hear instead of facts. If public schools were all that and doing what they are supposed to, then maybe parents would not need a SCHOOL OF CHOICE, rather it is charter, private or homeschool. Finally, I need for people like you and those who support public schools to know and consider that one school does not fit everyone...that' why CHOICES are given.
anonymous
|
February 24, 2012
Charter schools are schools that receive public money but are not subject to some of the rules, regulations, and statutes that apply to other public schools in exchange for some type of accountability for producing certain results, which are set forth in each school's charter.

I have been to Mableton Charter. My children were accepted there and Smyrna. Chose to enroll them in Smyrna. Pulled them out of Smyrna (as dozens and dozens of other parents have at both Mableton and Smyrna of the past few years)- when it was clear that it would be a long time before the school would be living up to its commitments.

Finally, I need for people like you to realize the FACTS - IIAM received public funds based on a promise to meet a number of specific commitments - you did not come close to meeting the commitments - you have no one to blame but yourselves (by you I mean the IIAM board/those who elected the board/Imagine). You don't meet your commitments - you lose your choice.
it continues
|
February 23, 2012
Ever since the outrageous calendar fiasco, going against the majority of families and teachers, I knew things were going to go downhill fast, and I, of course, was correct. I only wish the SACS would have sanctioned the board with more than a slap on the wrist, maybe that would have got some attention. Can't wait til the next election!!!
@ it continues
|
February 25, 2012
calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, whine, calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, whine, calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, calendar, whine... RTT: your rant is getting tiresome and old. This county can't wait for you to shut it.
Yawn1
|
February 23, 2012
Another slow week in Marietta.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides