If TIA fails, look to LaBarge for ‘Plan B’
February 14, 2012 12:00 AM | 1034 views | 7 7 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

Some Georgia citizens, especially those with knowledge of the transit benefits of one mode or another of passenger rail, have long been advocates of increased attention by elected officials and other “influentials” to transportation challenges facing metro Atlanta and much the rest of the nation. Not until the subject reached crisis proportions in recent years did new and creative approaches to transportation appear to gain a place of significance on this state’s legislative agenda. Last year that changed with the TIA bill, also known as TSPLOST, calling for a referendum this summer regarding an increase in sales tax to finance long-overdue projects to reduce congestion, aid air quality and increase mobility options. This legislation was designed to help keep metro Atlanta in the growing and vibrant category of important U.S. communities.

However, after passage of this legislation, applauded by those dedicated to transportation progress, it became obvious that provisions of the bill would be a challenge to implement. And perhaps difficult to win voter approval.

In Cobb there has been a chorus of respected elected officials, media commentators and citizens, some of whom supported the TIA bill before it passed, voicing opposition to TSPLOST and/or to projects set forth by Cobb’s commission chairman and a mayor of a Cobb city. The opposition found fault with many aspects of the bill: “no new taxes,” “not in my backyard,” “no light rail,“ “no MARTA in Cobb,” etc., as well as the designated representatives of the county. Thus, TIA/TSPLOST has become a “nay-sayers” wonderland.

All of this has led to much discussion and debate, although not enough of the latter in the opinion of some. Such interplay of opinion — some knowledgeable, some not — has taken place in various forums as well as in the MDJ. Many of those favoring a positive TSPLOST vote understand this opportunity has been a long time coming and a second chance may not be possible anytime soon. Furthermore, there is an understanding that virtually all transportation needs some public (taxpayer) support in one way or another, as necessary public services that private enterprise alone cannot support. Included would be highways, bridges, streets, airways, waterways, ports and, yes, passenger rail transit.

The “discussion and debate” on TSPLOST got a major boost in the Sunday edition of the MDJ via the “More Opinion” page contribution of guest columnist Tom LaBarge, headlined “Do-over required on Transportation Improvement Act.“ While this participant in transportation endeavors, professionally and avocationally, for over half a century, is not sure that “postponing” the TIA referendum is a good idea, he appreciates the perspective and overview Mr. LaBarge has set forth in his thoughtful and informed column. His analysis is worthy and fair. Especially praiseworthy are his words “It’s time to put an end to the gamesmanship, self-serving parochial politics, and the near circus-like attitude clearly visible in our attempts to manage transport issues.” Amen!

In concluding a call to “Rebuild the TIA,” LaBarge says, “Cobb citizens deserve better, as does the entire region,” If the TSPLOST proposal should fail, Mr. LaBarge’s thinking should constitute the groundwork for “Plan B.”

Richard E. Hodges

East Cobb
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
SG68
|
February 14, 2012
Plan A (the Lee/Mathews boondoggle) is obviously not going to work, so a Plan B is something we should start thinking about now.

Putting the current TIA off for two years is going to have little if any impact on the construction timetable for the ill conceived proposed light rail. So that shouldn't even be a part of the argument.

That is probably a 15 to 20 year process once you get the Feds involved.

Delaying the vote allows the obvious flaws in the TIA legislation to be addressed.

It allows the Alternatives Analysis to be completed, scrutinized and debated in a more publicly responsible forum.

It allows the current project list to be revised to something that resembles a step in the direction of providing a regional transportation solution.

It allows us to replace Lee and Mathews on the Roundtable with individuals who actually have the interests of Cobb County at heart.

The bottom line is that delaying the TIA referendum has many more positive impacts on the future of transportation issues than negative ones.

No Money
|
February 14, 2012
Once the July 31 TSPLOST/TIA Tax passes there will be no money for other projects for 10 years.

Actually no money for 40 years, because there is no funding to pay the operations and maintenance cost for that $700 million TSPLOST train from the Arts Center to Cumberland Mall.

So you can forget funding to fix US41, or the I-285/I-75 interchange either.
Moves more traffic
|
February 14, 2012
Make Cobb Parkway a modern limited access highway with frontage roads to access businesses. That's worth a billion dollars as opposed to two reversible toll lanes on I-75.
homeownernextdoor
|
February 14, 2012
I've heard worse ideas to be certain.
Two lanes a waste
|
February 14, 2012
Great idea. Cobb pkwy is wide enough to support 3 lanes or more in each direction. Making it limited access and adding bridges will make a great alternative to 75. Two lanes on 75 for a billion dollars is a joke.
misterbill
|
February 14, 2012
I hate the thought of Cobb Parkway being converted to a limited access roadway. I hate the idea that most people hold that growing the Atlanta area is a good thing. That said, we are the 9th largest metropolitan area in the United States and we need help in resolving traffic congestion.

Moves more traffic--

your solution is a good one, under the circumstances. It beats the other ideas. I have lived in the metropolitan area of Boston, New York, New Jersey and Tampa. I have seen, what I consider to be the utter ugliness of raised rail transportation. The damage that follows as folks move away from the transportation areas.

The use of a, mostly, commercial road causes less harm to the residential areas. The reduction of exits (limited), will speed the traffic. Alas, it all will exit in Atlanta and so we will have moved the problem into Atlanta proper.

There is no single solution that does not bring its own set of problems. It would be a big help if the use of telecommuting was more widely used by corporations.

Worthy Alternative
|
February 14, 2012
While the transit plan is a dud and 2 part time lanes on I75 is a waste, making Cobb Parkway an express road makes a lot of sense. Right now much of Cobb Parkway is an eyesore and leveling it and cleaning it up like Gwinnett did with Peachtree Industrial Blvd seems like a good answer to the rising amount of traffic today and the additional amount when the expanded Port of Savannah opens. It will be a parallel alternative to I75 without all the trucks. A win-win for everyone, no tolls, no transit and a fast alternative.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides