Pete Borden: Maglev - maybe magic, maybe myth
by Pete Borden
Columnist
December 27, 2011 12:01 AM | 1441 views | 16 16 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
It is inconceivable that the meeting of the Cumberland Community Improvement District, on Dec. 15 went as it was reported by Jon Gillooly in the MDJ. However, I am assured, by attendees that it happened just as described. East Cobb Commissioner Bob Ott invited the board of the Cumberland CID to visit the test track built by American Maglev and learn about the technology that is about to be offered to Cobb County, with no initial taxpayer dollars being required.

Maglev (short for magnetic levitation) technology refers to a system of transit vehicles travelling on elevated rails, raised about a half inch above the rails by magnetic force and propelled by small engines. Traveling on a magnetic field, there is virtually no friction; therefore the need for powerful, fuel-inefficient engines is eliminated.

Instead of embracing the opportunity to investigate a potential solution to some of the county’s traffic congestion nightmares, the board chairman, Tad Leithead, was less than interested and the Cumberland CID’s highly paid Executive Director, Malaika Rivers, could not be bothered, refusing to make any effort to contact the company. She did, however, condescend to grant Ott permission to pass along her contact information to American Maglev.

Cobb Transportation Director Faye DiMassimo expressed concern that it was not eligible for federal funding. The concern is immaterial, since no tax money would be required to construct the maglev system. However, since Ms. DiMassimo is a strong proponent of the questionable light rail proposal, it does indicate that it would require federal funding at some point in time.

The refusal to even investigate maglev is confusing, until one realizes that the Cumberland CID is a leading backer of the TSPLOST-funded light-rail proposal, which would finance construction of a rail system from Cumberland to downtown Atlanta. They simply refuse to consider there may be other alternatives.

On the one hand is the light rail proposal at a guaranteed taxpayer cost of $895 million dollars for one line, into downtown Atlanta, only one tenth of which is in Cobb County It also comes with a guaranteed ongoing shortfall in operating expenses, of between $18 million and $37 million annually, to be paid forever by the poor taxpayers.

On the other hand is the American Maglev proposal for 22 miles of track, all within Cobb, at zero taxpayer dollars for construction and which contains no guarantee of a shortfall requiring public dollars. A possibility exists of taxpayer funds being required, if the needed ridership is not met. However, that possibility is no greater than the light rail falling short of its projected ridership.

Faced with a choice between a billion dollars of taxpayers’ money, including ongoing operating expenses, or a possibility of zero taxpayer funding ever being required, is it any wonder our officials, along with the board of the Cumberland CID, can’t decide if the American-Maglev proposal is worthy of investigation?

Critics of this technology point to a similar project at Old Dominion University in Virginia which went sour for lack of funding and developing technology problems over a decade ago. The maglev technology, which is worldwide, has taken giant strides forward in the past decade.

The project, which was relying on federal funding, broke ground four days prior to 9/11 and the federal money never materialized. For that reason Tony Morris, president of American Maglev, is not proposing any more projects financed by federal, state or local government funds. It is important to understand that the Cobb County proposal, which our officials are snubbing, calls for construction of the entire project to be privately funded.

The detractors also point out the crash of a test system in Germany which claimed 23 lives in 2006. However, the accident has been blamed by German officials on safety features not being in place, not the technology.

What the detractors fail to tell us is that Shanghai has had a system in full operation, since 2004, which whisks passengers to and from the airport, at speeds up to 250 MPH. The system has not reached its full potential yet and does require subsidizing. However, according to the Chinese press, it is now close to paying its own way.

Though maglev may not be the answer to Cobb’s problems, and I am certainly not going to propose that it is, I will say that to rule it out without any investigation is totally insane.

The “Don’t look!” position is puzzling and, quite frankly, totally unacceptable.



Pete Borden is a retired masonry contractor in east Cobb.
Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
TIC
|
December 28, 2011
Every one of the comments below that oppose this maglev technology are assuming it is THEIR tax money being spent to build and operate the system.

It just shows how brainwashed they are. They have been conditioned to think that only "big brother" government can do projects like this.

They simply can't conceive that it can be done any other way.

As I understand it the maglev project is totally on the backs of the private sector.

If it doesn't work as touted then Cobb County taxpayers are not on the hook.

I like that!!!

At Risk
|
December 28, 2011
@TIC - I think you've over generalized. The cost of building it is to be borne by the private investors. The cost to operate and maintain is what MAY be borne by taxpayers if the unconventional maglev doesn't compete well against personal cars.
TIC
|
December 29, 2011
I will try to be more specific.

This is MY interpretation of what I have heard and read.

The construction and the operating and maintenance expenses are borne totally by the private sector.

The minimum ridership "backstop" or "guarantee" that is required from the public partners covers all of those costs.

If the ridership falls short of what is necessary to make the system financially sustainable, then the public sector partners are responsible for that shortfall.

If the ridership exceeds the minimum then the public partners participate in the excess revenues that are generated.

At least, in this concept, we know what that maximum downside is.

The upside is unlimited.

If the system is successful in competing with the car, then not only is the taxpayer not required to spend one penny to subsidize the system, they can actually profit from it's success.

A great incentive to support the system.

With public transit systems there is no limit to the downside.

They have proven to be a black hole for the taxpayers.
Disingenuous
|
December 28, 2011
Mr Borden, I agree with your criticism of the CID and our so-called leaders: They DO need to HONESTLY look into alternatives!

However, you touted the success of a totally different type of maglev technology on AMT's behalf and even threw in a pinch of Chinese propaganda to help the cause. The AMT system can't go any faster than about 65mph with a hearty tailwind, much less from a dead stop at the bottom of a hill with a full load of passengers!

You're right. The fix for light rail IS in. But if the door truly opens for an alternative, let's be honest in assessing it!
The Truth
|
December 28, 2011
I am glad that the CID's, the CCDOT, The Chairman, GDOT, the Governor, the State of Georgia and the states around us are smart enough to see a con game when it comes to Morris and his claims. If it were so, we would be riding on one somewhere around us. We aren't and we won't because he can't deliver. But Captian Ott is blowing his pipe and the children are following him toward the cliff. Good luck, kids.
anonymous
|
December 28, 2011
The Truth, nice name calling...but very little meat to help us know what makes you say Mr. Morris is running a con game.

How about piping up with some facts to support your claim...so that we don't get the impression you are just a clueless idiot who never let's his lack of intelligence or information get in the way of mindlessly mouthing off about stuff.

NotSoPC
|
December 28, 2011
WOW!!

Calling the CID's, CCDOT, Tim Lee, GDOT etc., "smart" just goes to show how really, really delusional you are!!

The den of theives you named have one goal and one goal only.

To delve as deeply into your pocket (and mine) as they possibly can so they can fund their own selfish interests with our tax money.

Please keep it up.

I find your "intelligent" comments very entertaining!!
Your Thin Attempt
|
December 28, 2011
Nice try, Bill.
Third Floor
|
December 28, 2011
The bricklayer has proven again that he has masonary dust between his ears. Perhaps some of the bloggers have some as well. If this mag lev was so great, why don't we have systems in all of the cities? Because it is being promoted by used car salesman; you can insert several names here. This reminds me of an old saying, "if it is too good to be true, then it isn't true". Wake up and stop drinking the cool aid.
URKiddingRight?
|
December 27, 2011
Great column Mr. Borden.

To me this is not so much about the viability of the maglev concept (although it sounds pretty good), as it is about the attitude of the Cumberland CID and the Cobb DOT when it comes to considering other potential solutions to our traffic woes.

If it is not their pre-determined solution, then it must be unworthy of consideration.

It just proves once again that the $1.8M Alternatives Analysis is just a government funded scam designed to support an already decided outcome.

Shouldn't the Feds be a little upset with that approach?

It looks like anybody, even an elected official, that makes a suggestion that there might be another way to address our traffic issues will be treated with disrespect and disdain.

It is a sad state of affairs when the very people that should be promoting the best interests of Cobb County are taking very deliberate steps to jeopardize the future of our community.

As they say "With friends like this ........................"

I Say
|
December 27, 2011
Leithead, Rivers, Lee, DiMassimo, Reid and others are against Maglev because they won't get their usual kickbacks from Maglev like the would otherwise. At this point Maglev is the only logical option: LOCAL COBB COUNTY COMPANY that can PUT LOCAL PEOPLE TO WORK, NO TAX PAYER MONEY to get up and running, relatively new technology that has been around long enough to be improved/perfected, environmentally friendly.
CobbCountyRedneck
|
December 27, 2011
The Cumberland CID represents all that is wrong with Cobb County theses days.

Overpaid bureaucrats, arrogant, close minded leadership and political and ethical corruption.

A recipe for disaster.
NotSoPC
|
December 27, 2011
I'm with you Mr. Borden.

The fact that the Cumberland CID and Cobb County reacted in such a negative manner to Commissioner Ott's suggestion not only calls into question their judgement, but their integrity.

It certainly gives credence to the strong suspicions that "the fix is in" on the light rail proposal.

It certainly appears that Tad Leithead, Ms. Rivers and Ms. Dimassimo are far more obligated to promoting the agenda of Kasim Reed, MARTA and the City of Atlanta than they are to representing the best interests of the citizens Cobb County.

Even more disappointing is that Cobb County's chief elected official, Tim Lee is solidly in their corner.

It's just more proof that they all need to go.
anonymous
|
December 27, 2011
M Rivers provides a perfect example what happens when you establish an unaccountable quasi-governmental body with the authority to tax. Bold and unrestrained arrogance toward the people and the elected representatives of the people.

It is time for a comeuppance for M. Rivers. May it be very public...and sting.
Craig Kootsillas
|
December 27, 2011
The recent Cumberland CID meeting shows that the process is wrong.

Elected officials shouldn't be appealing to the CID, elected officials should be working to create a transportation solution that benefits the County.

Our elected officials should be MADE to weigh in.

This would have happened had CDOT followed the rules and brought a rail plan (any rail plan) before the Board of Commissioners for adoption.

That never happened.

Instead, they inserted a traffic simulation and our elected officials are letting them get away with it.

It's too bad that ALL of our commissioners are not up for re-election this time.
anonymous
|
December 27, 2011
Mr. Borden, I think you forgot to mention the current plan being pushed by the Cumberland CID requires all passengers to pass through the Cumberland area. This, inherently gives the Cumberland area a huge advantage when competing for consumer's dollars.

Thus, there really is no reason to wonder why a system which does not give this 'built in advantage' to the Cumberland area will not be considered by Tim Lee and friends.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides