Marietta offers deal to repair storm drainpipe
by Jon Gillooly
jgillooly@mdjonline.com
Aug 02, 2011 | 2541 views | 10 10 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Councilman Johnny Sinclair talks to Faye McBee outside her Marietta home about the sinkhole in her driveway on July 1. <br> Photo by Jon-Michael Sullivan
Councilman Johnny Sinclair talks to Faye McBee outside her Marietta home about the sinkhole in her driveway on July 1.
Photo by Jon-Michael Sullivan
slideshow
MARIETTA — The city has offered to divert the storm water that runs through a large underground pipe that collapsed between two homes on Wright Street, causing a sinkhole, but one of the homeowners says no deal.

At a Wednesday special called meeting, the city council approved an offer, 4-2, with Johnny Sinclair and Philip Goldstein opposed and Van Pearlberg absent, that would abandon the segment of the culvert that runs through the properties, leaving the gaping hole for them to deal with.

Goldstein said he voted against the proposal because the culvert is on private property and is not the responsibility of the city.

Sinclair said he voted against the proposal because city staff had previously offered Faye McBee, a grandmother of three who lives at the corner of Wright and Henderson streets, and her neighbor, Brenna Bentley Bitler, a way to fix the pipe that was less expensive.

But Dan Conn, the city’s public works director, said that offer was months ago, and since then the pipe has further deteriorated.

The latest proposal approved by council is for the city to plug the pipe upstream from the two houses and reroute the water flow along Wright Street. The city would pay $14,000 and the homeowners would pay a total of $8,265. Conn said he mailed both homeowners the offer on Friday and has not yet heard from them.

There’s a good reason for that, McBee said Monday.

“There is no way I’m going to do that,” she said. “This culvert’s got to be dug up or it’s going to keep collapsing.”

McBee said the city can threaten her, but she doesn’t have the money to fix the sinkhole or participate in the city’s proposal. And her neighbor has moved out and is living elsewhere, she said.

“They threatened to declare me a public nuisance and condemn my house,” she said of the city.

“It’s like everybody I talk to says it’s ridiculous, but nobody can do anything.”

In March, McBee noticed that the earth beneath part of her concrete driveway was gone. City officials found a four-foot square storm drainage pipe that directs storm water from upstream of McBee’s neighbor’s house, running under McBee’s driveway and under Wright Street before ending at the creek across the street from her home.

In other business, Sandtown Village, a 22-lot subdivision off Sandtown Road north of Austell Road, has a new developer.

Marietta-based Venture Homes is buying the property, valued at $500,000, from East Bluff, who acquired it from United Community Bank after the development went into foreclosure in 2009.

Venture Homes has two of the lots under contract and plans to buy 15 more, said Bob White, Venture Homes president.

White received permission from the council on Wednesday to enlarge the footprint of the homes from a range of 1,400 to 1,700 square feet to 1,550 to 2,600 square feet while keeping the lot sizes the same. The deal hinged upon the change.

“Our plans are to offer the lowest base price, without any upgrades, in the $150,000s,” White said. “Venture will maintain a minimum of two spec homes in inventory, and market demand will determine the pace of construction.”

City Development Services Director Brian Binzer said the five remaining lots were built and sold before the property entered foreclosure by Oakley Development, whose president, Mark Gibbs, is a member of the Marietta Redevelopment Corporation.
Comments
(10)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Steve C
|
August 16, 2011
I drive by these houses on a regular basis. One of the houses looks like they moved out. The driveway gate has been closed and the yard is overgrown. What happens if they dont fix it and the pipe collapses or they abandon the house and the house falls in the hole? Who will fix the pipe then?
FROM TEXAS
|
August 03, 2011
She better take the deal the city doesn’t have to do anything, she should work with the city on this. She can tell her heirs to help her or they won’t get the house as well. Hate to see her lose that house it could be condemned not a good solution for anybody.
truht hurts
|
August 02, 2011
GOLDSTEIN JUST WANTS A SHOT AT STEALING THE HOUSE SO HE CAN PUT SOME STRAW OVER THE HOLE AND RENT IT OUT TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!
Local resident
|
August 02, 2011
The city didn't create this problem. The homes and and the drainage area were built by private citizens during the original construction. The city has been helpful, but doesn't need to take responsibility. Should they pay for a sink hole in your back yard that was caused because the builders filled in a whole with trash that has now decomposed. This was the original owner/builders fault, not the city.
Duty
|
August 02, 2011
Sounds like the solution being offered is a permanent solution and leaves any future water drainage problems with the city, which is where water drainage problems belong. Are there not some charities or churches that could help Mrs. McBee so she does not lose her home?
C'mon...
|
August 02, 2011
Does the City not own the pipes that carry drain water down to the creek? I would suspect they do, particularly if this stretch is hooked up to something the City maintains. If this has to go to trial the City will lose. I truly doubt either homeowner installed the square pipe through their property or any other previous homeowner...it just doesn't make sense.
Joe Taxpayer
|
August 02, 2011
Johnny sure does love those photo ops.
Come on, Guys.
|
August 02, 2011
Who put the drainage pipe into the ground. Not the home owners! The City has an obligation to fix it. Phillip Goldstein should be more responsible for his elected office.
Say what!
|
August 02, 2011
The city made this mess, let them clean it up. Not likely in conservative Cobb. Exactly where does the city plan to divert the water to? Probably into someone else's property. I suggest you turn the matter over to Phillip Goldstein who has experience with unsightly holes in the ground.
robbieh
|
August 02, 2011
the city could avoid future buried drain pipe issues by committing to keeping surface water on top of the ground.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides