Board will decide CCT bus routes' fate
by Laura Braddick
lbraddick@mdjonline.com
June 27, 2011 12:00 AM | 5305 views | 15 15 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The 8:25 a.m. CCT route 35 bus from the MARTA Holmes station in Atlanta to Cobb Hospital off Austell Road carries a majority of its passengers to and from work.<br>Staff/Erin Gray
The 8:25 a.m. CCT route 35 bus from the MARTA Holmes station in Atlanta to Cobb Hospital off Austell Road carries a majority of its passengers to and from work.
Staff/Erin Gray
slideshow
MARIETTA - Commissioners will decide whether to cut Cobb Community Transit bus Routes 35, 65 and 70 at its meeting Tuesday evening.

At the 1:30 p.m. work session Tuesday, commissioners will hear a progress report from the Cobb Citizen Oversight Committee, which is reviewing county operations for improvements.

The vote on the CCT routes will take place at the 7 p.m. meeting.

If approved, service on Routes 35, 65 and 70, including paratransit service for disabled riders associated with those lines, will stop on Aug. 1.

A fare increase is not being considered at this time.

CCT Director Rebecca Gutowsky said the lines were selected because they were the least used of the system's local routes.

Route 35, for example, costs a little less than $1 million to operate and has an average daily ridership of 313, while Route 30, which runs from the Marietta Transfer Center to MARTA's Holmes Station in Atlanta, has a daily ridership of about 3,000.

Route 65 has an average daily ridership of 481 and travels from the transfer center to Johnson Ferry Baptist Church and, on peak hours, to the Dunwoody MARTA station. Route 70, which goes from Cumberland Boulevard Transfer Center to County Services Parkway, has an average ridership of 462.

Cutting the three lines and the paratransit service associated with each route will save the county about $2.4 million, CCT Director Rebecca Gutowsky said.

"There are two sides: the operating side and revenue side," she said. "The operating costs go down, but you also lose ridership revenues from fares. So it's not quite a $2.4 million in savings, but the budget won't be as big."

Of the CCT's $18.4 million budget for 2011, about 25 to 30 percent is funded by fares, which are $4 for express bus and paratransit and $2 for one-way local routes. The rest of the budget is subsidized by taxpayer money.

In April, commissioners revised the 2011 budget and mandated 10 percent cuts to all departments, including CCT. Because of federal regulations, the agency had to conduct several public meetings and hear feedback before recommending service cuts or fare increases before the changes could be made.

A total of 141 people submitted comments during the public hearing timeframe.

If approved, the cuts will affect about 500 paratransit users.

"That includes those that live in the areas with service or travel into those areas," Gutowsky said.

CCT will be notifying all riders of the service cuts by posting notices on buses, transfer centers, at bus stops along the routes and on its website.

Chairman Tim Lee said the cuts were likely to be approved at the meeting, but steps would be taken to help those affected.

"We're going to reach out to every single person who uses the paratransit system to help them find options," he said.

Gutowsky said some of the paratransit users will qualify for other public programs for disabled riders or through private companies.

Paratransit riders affected by the cuts who need assistance finding new transportation can call (770) 528-1679.

Started in 1989, CCT has 16 local lines, which run along surface streets, and eight express bus lines that travel during peak hours

Paratransit uses smaller buses to serve people with certified disabilities who cannot use the fixed-route system.
Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Voice of Reason
|
July 05, 2011
So who are the 313 riders per day? Is it about 150 people taking the bus to work and home from work? Or maybe 100 back and forth leaving 113 riding the bus throughout the rest of the day?

Why not disburse small vans to take you to/from workplace for a little more? Or you can call to schedule a van to pick up at the bus stop? If they're at a stop, they can read off a code posted on panel and verify location. Charge the phone for the service and go pick up the rider. This behavior of running empty buses on routes throughout the day is more wasteful than waiting for a call and shuttling a van to pick up a passenger.

Mass transit doesn’t mean mass stupidity and waste!

Voice of Reason
|
July 05, 2011
So who are the 313 riders per day? Is it about 150 people taking the bus to work and home from work? Or maybe 100 back and forth leaving 113 riding the bus throughout the rest of the day?

Why not disburse small vans to take you to/from workplace for a little more? Or you can call to schedule a van to pick up at the bus stop? If they're at a stop, they can read off a code posted on panel and verify location. Charge the phone for the service and go pick up the rider. This behavior of running empty buses on routes throughout the day is more wasteful than waiting for a call and shuttling a van to pick up a passenger.

Mass transit doesn’t mean mass stupidity and waste!

anonymous
|
July 02, 2011
I never understood why Cobb did not partner with MARTA? Would we not have a more effective system?
haveaheart2
|
June 28, 2011
It really sad that some citizens of Cobb County are ignorant to assume that most of the customers of CCT are renters and have low paying jobs. That may be the case for some not all. People need to open their eyes and look at the gas prices and economy. Please Mr. Ott and Mr. Lee have a heart for some of us who use public transit. Think about it if it was you our family that needed this. You can't be that cold hearted. Everything doesn't have to do with money and budgets.
No Santa Clause
|
June 28, 2011
I feel sorry for the people that depend on CCT for transportation to work every day. You're at the mercy of folks that don't have the sense to develop profitable routes that can then subsidize routes base on need.

Sorry ... but at this rate, I don't think CCT is going to last.
Pat H
|
June 28, 2011
What percentage of the school and general fund expenditures are paid by residents' property taxes?

That is the percentage of any bus service that should be supplied by the users of the bus system. Most are renters anyway and could easily move closer to their work so they do not have to rely on the taxpayers to subsidize their big, comfortable air-conditioned chauffeured bus ride to work.

If you do not have a car, you do not pay ad valorum taxes and registration every year, car insurance, repairs, maintenance, tires, emissions tests every year, gasoline, oil and car payments as most cars cost over $20,000. With that amount of savings, "low" income bus riders have more discretionary income than those of us who own and drive private automobiles.

To demand that taxpayers pay the more than 70% of the cost of your almost free ride is insanity.

And, unlike us car owners, you never have to bear the devastation of the many illegal alien hit and run accidents who of course have no insurance, no license, no problem.
Boot Tim & Bob
|
June 27, 2011
Tim Lee and Bob Ott have already kicked our seniors to the curb. Now they want to kick those who depend on public transit too.
Who's running this?
|
June 27, 2011
To those below that are wondering if the people making the decisions have ever ridden the buses, my guess would be NO! And it takes more than a couple of rides to really understand public transportation. It's obvious that whomever is deciding this, DOESN'T understand the market for public transportation, or they would choose to increase service during peak hours and only offer minimum/emergency mid-day routes.

Who can ride a bus that doesn't have the stops and times of service that make sense? I see bus routes that arrive and depart very nearly on the hour and half hour. (Hello, Route 65!) Don't most people have to be at work on the hour or half hour? Doesn't it make sense to have buses arrive and depart from business centers on the 15 or 45 minute mark to allow a person to make it to/from his office?

If they want the buses to stop running by 6:30, they must only be trying to service shift workers, who know they will always be able to leave work on time. That schedule is too risky for alot of people that may not be able to leave work until the job is done.

The whole thought process behind this setup is ridiculous. Cobb County has little to no bus service currently. So that means the vast majority of it's residents already have transportation. Yet Cobb County is determined to ignore the market and only target lower income ridership. Metro areas that have successful mass transit systems have people of all economic demographics riding them. How is a transit system that limits its customer base in the way CCT does ever going become self sufficient?

There needs to be more focus on providing a transportation product to customers that already have their own means of getting to and from work each day. The improved product would then merit a rate increase.
Dustoff
|
June 27, 2011
So we the tax payers are paying over $13 million dollars a year for bus service for how many average daily riders???????

And the people that run this are the same idiots who want to run light rail!!!!

And just how much more tax will we pay to operate light rail????

Scares the hell out of me!!!!
plzlistentous
|
June 27, 2011
I second brica's comments. HOWEVER, why don't you consider providing peak hour services, when you KNOW you will have riders, instead of cutting service all together. You will LOSE many customers, if you cut service. Also, it may be a good idea to RIDE the buses before you make decisions. I can't attest for the 30 and 65, but the 70 does have more than 3-4 riders. And not everyone in Atlanta has cars. Look at the gas prices. Come on Comissioners listen to your constitutients and the CCT riders. Not just people who don't want bus service in Cobb.
Watcher...
|
June 27, 2011
Raise the Fares!
CCTrider
|
June 27, 2011
What about those who use the fixed route system? Will there be options for us. Some of us rely on CCT to get to and from work.
ACC12-SEC12 Booster
|
June 27, 2011
And just why aren't fare increases on the table? If people want to continue to be able to ride the buses then they should be asked and willing to pay most, if not all of the cost of operating the system through fares. Why does a transit system have to be dependent solely upon sales tax revenues only? It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if tax revenues aren't there then the money to operate the bus has to come from somewhere and that somewhere should be from the people who ride the bus if they want to keep riding that bus. Why are these politicians so afraid to fund transit at the fare box instead of with sales taxes, a move that is becoming increasingly unpopular, expecially with the rampant abuse of SPLOST revenues?
brica
|
June 27, 2011
I've never used the bus 35 but I have used the 70 and 65.They speak of low ridership, of course it would be LOW.The times for those buses have not met the public needs.the 70 cut off to early for people that worked at night.my son had to quit a job because he couldn't get home on the 70 route.the 65 hours of operation was no better.Of course ridership would be low,you have to meet the need hour wise for the people!! buses that run frequently will have higher ridership,that's common sense.INPROVE THE SERVICE,YOU WILL INPROVE RIDERSHIP.HAVE YOU THE DECISION MAKERS USED THE BUSES ON A DAILY BASES???
durrr
|
June 27, 2011
or u could have spend a few million on a marta station...durrr
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides