In the next month or so, KSU Interim Provost Dr. Ken Harmon will determine whether to greenlight a new department within KSU's College of Humanities and Social Sciences called The Department of Cultural and Regional Studies. That department would have seven academic programs under its banner: African and African Diaspora Studies, Gender and Women's Studies, Environmental Studies, Asian Studies, Latin American Studies, Peace Studies and American Studies.
"This is being put together by a bunch of activists," said Dr. Melvyn Fein, a tenured professor of sociology at KSU. "These folks do not have degrees in what they pretend to teach. To call it neo-Marxist is being very modest. These are activists who are going to use this to try and indoctrinate instead of teach."
But Arlethia Perry-Johnson, KSU's vice president for external affairs, said the seven programs that would make up the new department already exist at KSU, and the proposal is to simply consolidate them into one department. Bringing together professors who teach similar subject matter creates synergies and aides in communication, she said.
For example, at present, part of the Environmental Studies program is housed in KSU's College of Humanities and part of it is housed in KSU's College of Science and Mathematics, because students take courses offered by both colleges to shape their degree, based on whether their focus is more policy or science oriented, she said.
Perry-Johnson said the proposal for the new department has been created by the coordinators of each of the seven programs in question.
They are: Dr. Jesse J. Benjamin, associate professor of sociology, (African and African Diaspora Studies); Dr. Susan M. Rouse, professor of philosophy, (American Studies); Dr. May H. Gao, associate professor of communication, (Asian Studies); Dr. Mark W. Patterson, associate professor of geography, (Environmental Studies); Dr. R. Ugena Whitlock, associate professor of education and gender studies, (Gender and Women's Studies); Dr. Ernesto Silva, assistant professor of Spanish, (Latin American Studies); and Thomas M. Pynn, assistant professor of philosophy, (peace studies).
Pynn recently introduced KSU President Dan Papp at an event where he described "The Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx as "a call to conscience."
Although the Journal requested comment from any one of the seven professors listed above, Perry-Johnson said it would be inappropriate for them to comment since the proposal was at the provost level.
Fein accused the professors in question of trying to push through subject matter in the proposed new department that they have failed to get approved in existing departments. Once the new department is created, Fein said it would intrude on courses taught in other departments, by claiming to have a stake in them.
"It's going to be detrimental to the reputation of the university as a serious school," Fein said.
There's a reason why programs such as women's studies are on the decline nationwide, he said.
"Departments are closing around the country because students have learned, among other things, that if they want to get a job they shouldn't major in them. If your major is in women's studies, any employer who hires you is crazy. You're hiring a lawsuit, for heaven's sake," Fein said.
Among the subjects offered under the Gender and Women's Studies program, according to KSU's website, are Gender in Popular Culture, Transnational Feminisms, Black Feminisms, and "Queer Theory & Sexuality." The latter describes itself as "an interdisciplinary course that considers the global emergence and significance of theories and practices that 1) refute and destabilize the notion of an essential, normative sexuality and gender, and 2) suggest that sexuality is fluid and varied and is constructed by social, political, and economic factors."
Perry-Johnson said the new department is not expected to incur any additional cost to KSU since no additional faculty are expected to be hired to run it. Moreover, she said the proposal has already gone through two sets of votes by those faculty who would be involved. Faculty from the departments impacted voted 33-4 in January to authorize the initiation of discussing such a proposal.
A New York University consultant, Dr. Mary Louise Pratt, came to KSU in January to give advice for the program. She was paid $3,309 for her work.
Faculty then voted, 49-6 in favor of creating the program in a referendum from March 21 to 23.
Perry-Johnson also said Fein should have followed the chain of command in airing his concerns about the proposal.
"If his goal is to confer about his concerns and his opposition, the process exists for him to be able to do that in a manner that would have impact, rather than using the newspaper as a bully pulpit, when in fact his colleagues are here and open and accessible to him," Perry-Johnson said.
But Fein said he has made use of the chain of command, asking to speak with Papp, at which time he was referred to Interim Provost Ken Harmon.
Harmon said he looks forward to meeting with Fein and hearing his concerns. Once Harmon makes his recommendation, he will take it to Papp, who did not return calls for this article.












Follow us on Twitter!
Gender and Ethnic Studies Departments are a joke we don't need to subsidize. We can get more bang for our buck elsewhere.
By the way, I've always wondered what a women's studies, African studies, or peace studies major can add to a company. What special skillsets do they bring to a technology or manufacturing company?
And where is this guys evidence? Has he looked up all of the professor's degrees? Has he talked to every person who agreed that the department was a good idea? He has NO proof.
An argument without proof is no argument.
I urge KSU to keep striving for rigorous standards and relevant content, and therefore to decline establishing this phoney-baloney "department" that will prove to be nothing more than a hotbed for leftist activism and grievance-mongering. Leave that to the other colleges now being held hostage in supporting such parasitic departments. Thanks to those sorry examples, we can do better here.
Just keep hiring excellent history teachers, literature and language teachers, philosophy, business and science and math teachers who know how to teach, and are too professional and ethical to indoctrinate students in accordance with any Marxist or other political agenda.
While you're at it, please ensure that your School of Education is rigorous, effective, and reality-based as well. My daughter wants to become a teacher, and Hillsdale College is rather far away.
We rubes in the community are quixotically determined to have excellence in academia in our midst--not another dreary, politically-correct leftist token department.
1. Leaving GA was the smartest thing I ever did.
2. Sherman was far too gentle.
His remarks about the program and the faculty at KSU is there to indoctrinate students makes the presumption that the students are too stupid to know that they are being indoctrinated. That is not my experience with KSU students--they are mostly bright people who would push back at any attempts to manipulate them.
Academic freedom has nothing to do with shutting down classes or silencing voices--which is what Mel Fein is trying to do. Having taught and worked at KSU, if you had the theory and academics to back up your "side", there is not a professor I know who would not respect your view (even if they disagree). That isn't the point of this article though--it's about Mel Fein stomping his feet because he's "unhappy".
Please learn to read blogs. I did not call Fein a whiner. The blogger commenting on my earlier comment called him a whiner.
Stop throwing around the words "yellow journalism" and "red scare tactics" in hopes the fear factor will shut people up. Patriots, taxpayers and capitalists have as much right to First Amendment protection as America-bashers and communists do. Academic freedom is about open debate, not trying to shut down one side so that only one view prevails. And in my own experience as a student at KSU, a lot of professors still need to be reminded of this. Kudos to Dr. Fein.
Please reread the column. The point is not that his side did not win out but that due process was not followed. Also there seems to be a lack of open discussion on campus. As best I can tell, Dr. Fein is a true hero. To call him a whiner is shameful.
--I don't think the professor gave me the right grade (whine).
--I don't like my parking spot (whine).
--I didn't get a "fair" review from my boss (whine).
I'll bet the process for creating this new department has been going on for some time, as nothing happens quickly in a university. The article says Fein already had a chance to weigh in. That Fein is whining now is just that, whining because things didn't go the way he wanted.
Mel Fein is a joke and so are the very "tax payers" who believe they have "right" to dictate curriculum, yet have no degree.
Dr. Fein: Feed your head.
Throw the bums out: You should totally let you kid decide for his/herself where he/she wants to attend college. I hear your kid screaming "leave me alone mom/dad. stop smothering me"
OMIPS: you talk like a conservative...and it's clear that you don't know what you are talking about.
I take pride in my education. Dr. Fein obviously doesn't want me to.
Since you apparently speak from some knowledge and experience about these courses that have been around "for some time," I would love to have you--or some spokesperson from the seven centers--deal with the following questions:
1. What percentage of graduates from these courses are gainfully employed, except in hothouse imitative departments in our "progressive" colleges and universities?
2. How did these courses pass the Board of Regents approval when the rule has been for ages no unnecessary and expensive duplication of services?
3. What openness and diversity of thought exists in these departments as revealed through faculty publications and presentations, topics at conferences, and student publications and presentations?
4. What diversity of public presentations occurs?
5. Why was the vote kept from the public and campus at large.
I am somewhat familiar with these issues, having been at KSU for some time but thankfully in a legitimate department. I await someone to counter my answers. 1. I know of few if any graduates from these departments who went on the gainful employment outside a similar and narrow academic field. 2. I know that the discussion and vote was hurried and done without public or campus publicity. I don't imagine for a minute that KSU received Regents approval for the new department. 3. There is very very little diversity in faculty, presentation, and student output. Specifically the Hispanic movie series has been without exception left of center and pro-immigration, and American Studies conventions have to my knowledge NO presentation that could be considered right of center.
If I am wrong, please cite chapter and verse. And please do not call those with whom you disagree "uneducated, close-minded, and sheltered." That is not very tolerant, is it?
So he's technically an insider in both organizations, which happens all the time on the left of the political spectrum.
As far as allowing the students "decide the fate of the program" (Shane) I can tell you right now that these students (and you might be one) are naive as can be, swimming through the muck of left wing political correctness likely through their entire education. My own experience with a women's studies course at UGA in 1980 was: wake up, often times hung over, hit 7am swim class, barely make it, sopping wet across campus to women's studies, try not to laugh at the professor's ridiculous directions to find passages in the Bible that show Christians treated women like dirt. That is the extend of the class and I still have the Bible where she made us highlight the "horrendous" passages. I think back now and realize I had NO idea the purpose of this class back then. It was a time waster elective. But now I realize the propaganda, both anti-Christian and anti-male. I've wondered many times since 9-11 if this professor is still teaching and whether she ever, EVER mentions how women are treated under Sharia law and Islam, or whether she sticks to Christian bashing still. But back then? It was something to be endured and something to waste money on. I was clueless...
I believe the quota on stirring up nonsense to suit your own personal agenda is one per 30 days. Dr. Fein has now had two. Enough is enough.