Cobb schools' CFO: Data reveals deficit may pass $20-35M estimate
by Kathryn Malone
kmalone@mdjonline.com
March 08, 2011 12:00 AM | 3296 views | 14 14 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - Cobb County School District's chief financial officer warned board members during their second budget meeting Monday that the deficit could be worse than anticipated. The board also talked food and transportation.

Although CFO Mike Addison in January projected a budget shortfall of $20 to $35 million, he said Monday that the district is receiving more reliable property tax revenue projections from the county, and "it has gotten worse."

He will update the board at its Wednesday meeting.

Superintendent Fred Sanderson said he plans to present a budget to the board in late April. Sanderson warned board members that fiscal year 2012, which begins July 1, will likely prove to be especially difficult because the federal stimulus money is gone.

"Keep in mind that even three or four years ago, FY12 was always the dreaded year, and that's where we are because there's no stimulus money ... that's all gone away," he said.

Sanderson and his staff will create the budget on a property tax millage rate of 20 mills, like they did last year, with the assumption that the board would again vote to use excess funds from SPLOST II to buy down the millage rate to its current rate of 18.9 mills. Board Chairwoman Alison Bartlett appointed Vice Chairman Scott Sweeney as the board's budget liaison.

When Kathleen Angelucci questioned the legality of buying down the millage rate - since not all of the projects in the second special purpose local option sales tax have been completed - SPLOST chief Doug Shepard said it is legal as long as the money is already encumbered, which is the case.

The district previously announced it expects to maintain its current staffing and again delay salary step increases for all eligible employees for a half year. The district is required to send out all of its teacher contracts by May 15. The FY12 budget, which has to be approved by June 30, will include a 175-day school year again next year and five furlough days for all eligible employees.

David Banks questioned the district's anticipation of furlough days, saying that Gov. Nathan Deal has been very adamant about not imposing any more furlough days on teachers.

Sanderson doubted that the district would be able to slash furlough days.

"Mr. Banks, I can't read the governor's mind, but he hasn't indicated how they're going to fund that," Sanderson said.

Addison said the transportation budget for FY11 is $42.6 million. Of that, the state funds $5.2 million. Addison expects another mid-year cut of about $350,000.

Although the state funding assumes that the district will pick up students who live no closer than 1.5 miles from a school, the district has its own pick-up formula for safety reasons. Elementary students are picked up half a mile from school, while middle and high school students who live a mile away are eligible for bus pick-up. The district has roughly 950 bus drivers, with 78 percent of students eligible to ride the bus.

Chief Technology Officer Chris Ragsdale said increased costs of oil might equate to a higher transportation budget in FY12.

The school district and Cobb Government participate in the North Georgia Fuel Cooperative to obtain the best possible fuel prices for high volume purchase. Addison said the procurement department has obtained other bids for fuel costs through the past few years, but has concluded that the co-op is the best option for the district.

Although the district cut 2,500 bus stops in 2009, Sanderson discouraged the board from doing the same thing next school year to balance the budget, saying that the district has likely done all it can to maximize bus routing efficiency.

"And I think it's kid's safety first, and if we have to pick them up, we'll pick them up, we don't care if they live 100 yards from the school," Sanderson said.

While the budget for food and nutritional services is largely funded by its own self-supporting fund, it does reimburse the general fund approximately $2.4 million each year for things that are paid for out of the general fund, like maintenance and repairs and pest control.

Addison compared the food and nutrition program to running more than 100 individual restaurants in the district, saying that its budget for FY10 was $48.8 million in revenue and $47.7 million in expenditures. Last year alone, the district served 12.1 million lunches and 3.1 million breakfasts.

Despite the rising cost of food, Addison said, the district has been able to keep its lunch prices for students steady for the last nine years, at $1.60 for lunch at elementary schools, $1.75 for lunch at middle school and $1.85 for lunch at high school. Breakfast costs at all school levels have remained at $1 for all school levels.

Addison said the district could face a potential threat to its meal costs because the USDA may soon require districts to charge as much for full priced meals as it is reimbursed by the federal government for free meals. Currently, Addison explained, the district's reimbursement rate is considerably higher than what it pays for a full-price meal, and changes to the USDA policy could have a substantial impact to the district's food and nutrition budget.

Monday was the board's final scheduled budget meeting until April, when Sanderson will present his preliminary budget. After he presents that budget, the district is required by law to have at least two public forums for community input.

Board member David Morgan was not at Monday night's meeting and Bartlett said she did not know prior to the meeting he would not be in attendance.
Comments
(14)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
To Crisis...
|
March 22, 2011
See you and raise you one...

Do you remember last year when Morgan actually surfed the internet with 3 cameras watching him during the budget meeting.

That's about as much as he cares.

If he pays attention, it is when he is asking someone else to locate his opinion for him.

If he places Cobb County School Board on his resume, lord have mercy on his lying soul.
Agree
|
March 08, 2011
I have free and reduced students in class and it makes me sick to see how much food they throw away. The cafe staff makes them turn around and get two side items if they didn't select any. Really? If a 10yr didn't take an apple to begin with, do you think they will eat it just because you made them go back and take it. There needs to be a better system for Free-reduced, I have students with all the latest fashions each day and their parents drive then nicest mercedes and they get free lunch-- does anyone verify their income... could we submit W2's to prove? And how about students that get free lunch but they bring extra cash each day to purchase chips and ice cream... seriously? What a waste. I agree with previous posters- what happened to a bowl of cereal at home and only eating lunch at school. Huge waste of tax payer money!
anonymous
|
March 08, 2011
And North Cobb HS will be flooded tonight due to a calendar change battle. It would appear from this article that having or not having an extra 2 weeks off during the school year could be the least of the problems for our parents, teachers and most importantly the students will have to face.
Crisis....
|
March 08, 2011
to Truth Hurts - I LOVE it! I, also, took my lunch to school each day and ate breakfast at home too. We must have had horrible parents, I guess. They actually took care of us themselves and didn't expect the school to do it for them.

And when are we going to get rid of David Morgan? The people in his district better wake up. The are being SOOOOO under-represented.
parent of two
|
March 08, 2011
While I would not desire for my middle school child to ride the bus with high school students the comment is correct that both high school and middle school buses are typically near empty. Gas prices are on the rise and I don't see an end any time soon. Maybe combining bus routes is necessary. I think now we have to make tough decisions in order to preserve quality of education. If that means my children bring their lunch so be it.
Stop with the subs
|
March 08, 2011
The decrease in sub days are because if a teacher uses more than 7 sub days, he/she will receive notification, as using more than 7 days is part of the evaluation/RFT policy. Those of you teachers using the reduced sub pay as justification for balanced calendar just didn't pay attention to RFT 101 presented last spring.
Bus Routes
|
March 08, 2011
In my neighborhood, the middle and high school buses are barely half full. Let's re-examine combining the middle and high school buses like Cherokee does. It would be more efficient, cheaper and shifting middle school hours to start earlier would be a huge benefit for the children. I know mine hates getting home from school at 4:45 and having to be out the door less than 30 minutes later to get to a practice or game.
Stop breakfasf
|
March 08, 2011
Breakfast costs the taxpayers because we have to staff the cafeteria. We need to stop servng breakfast! In addition, you are building Clarkdale which will cost more to staff even though we don't have a need to rebuild that school.
re: a teacher
|
March 08, 2011
The problem is that the change in calendar is actually going to cost more money. Bartlett's "mysterious" and unsupported assertions, all indications are that the traditional calendar actually costs more money (ie. subs alone).
Saudi
|
March 08, 2011
Guess when fuel costs are historically at their highest? August!!!! So balanced calendar lovers at least we save two weeks of fuel on those gas guzzlers....
freelunch
|
March 08, 2011
but they want to get the federal money so they offer breakfast and try to get everyone to fill out he free and reduced paperwork to get all the free money possible
A teacher
|
March 08, 2011
To all those teachers who complained about the balanced calendar: Now that you know the true story about the budget, I bet you may not be so worried about the winter break - the board is trying to save your jobs. If this action saves even 3 -4 jobs, it was worth it!

Parents: do you really want to add another 2 - 3 students to your classroom in order you get that break? I did not think so
Sammy L
|
March 08, 2011
Dont worry, most of the food isn't worth the price even if it was free. We still eat breakfast at home and take our lunch.

TRUTH HURTS
|
March 08, 2011
THAT'S WEIRD, WHEN I WENT TO SCHOOL THERE WAS NO BREAKFAST AND I BROUGHT MY LUNCH EVERY DAY. HOW DID I EVER SURVIVE! WHEN ARE YOU GONNA START SERVING DINNER AT THE TAX PAYERS EXPENSE?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides