Rod Paramoure: Pork: How Washington pigs out on our tax dollars
by Rod Paramoure
Guest Columnist
December 03, 2010 12:00 AM | 630 views | 4 4 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A recent Associated Press column in the MDJ ("Earmark ban all politics, no substance," Nov. 20) accurately describes how "earmarks" are deeply engrained in our political system. It errs, however, in suggesting that $16 billion (or more) in earmarks each year is of little consequence. In my view, $160 billion - over a 10-year period - of borrowed money - plus interest - is plenty to be concerned about.

There are several varieties of earmarks, each by championed by its own lobby. Here is an elementary guide to how the Washington pork is sliced.

Basic earmarks: "the bridge to nowhere" version. These earmarks are attached to unrelated bills in the dark-of-night by powerful individual congressmen for their personal political gain. Earmarks are paid for from federal taxes, but are only available to selected communities. Earmarks are worse-than-worthless to the nation, but do help their sponsors achieve long congressional careers.

Pork sausage (sometimes called bologna): "Stimulus" or "Obamacare" are perfect examples. You wouldn't want to watch congressional pork sausages being made. They are made from unsavory ingredients, and cooked-up in sweaty backrooms by grubby people with unclean hands. They are then mislabeled as being fit for public consumption. Congressional sausages have deleterious side-effects, and have been known to cause severe indigestion and other internal maladies. These pork products are palatable only to far-left taste.

Pork chops: "Congress will control how money is spent" version. In some respects, this is an entirely reasonable cut of pork because Congress is responsible for determining how taxes should be spent. Pork chops are not hidden from the public; they are discussed and voted on in committees and by Congress. Pork chops become problematic when appropriation bills are cut into smaller pieces so that Congress can "direct" how some of the money will be divided up. Using pork chops, powerful congressmen can influence which politically favored activities receive priority for funding. On the other hand, making pork chops limits the administration's discretion on how the money should be allocated; this can actually be a beneficial effect (see "bacon" below).

Bacon: "the bringing home the bacon" version. The administration is legally responsible for spending the money that Congress appropriates. The rule is, "Congress appropriates and the administration dissipates." Bacon slicing becomes a problem when appropriations that haven't already been "chopped" by Congress are spent by the administration in ways that it hopes will buy political loyalty. The administration greases its activities - sometimes known as fatback for fatcats - by granting strips of bacon to its favored supporters or projects. The administration relies on its bureaucracy to deliver the bacon. Depending on their political status, some groups get "center-cut" bacon, but others get only bacon bits.

Earmarks got their name from a cut made in a pig's ear to mark its ownership. Earmarks serve much the same purpose in politics. Funds are "carved out" of the appropriations pork, labeled with the carver's name, and placed in the pots of preferred panhandlers. Earmarks, of any variety, are at best "a pig in a poke" - of questionable value. Political earmarks are also like the expression, "in a pig's ear" - a mess or muddle (likely from drinking too much). There is also the old truism that even politicians "can't make a silk purse out of a sow's earmark."

Earmarks are a serious problem: Midnight earmarks and pork sausage endanger our national political health and should be permanently eliminated. We have created a huge hog of a government, and it is costing us dearly to keep it fed. Congressional "pork chops" and administrative "bacon" are mostly feed for this greedy behemoth.

No matter how they are labeled, earmarks are the lubrication of Washington politics. Congress slices and dices, but taxpayers are left only with are the pig's tail, feet and parts of the ears.

Rod Paramoure is a retired military officer, educator and historian living in east Cobb.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
rebuseye
|
December 03, 2010
Kevin

You don't have to be a liberal to waste the taxpayers money, but apparently the progressive philosophy provides a justification for the liberals, propensity to spend other peoples' wages.
ATF
|
December 03, 2010
What is so much fun right now, in a sick kind of way of which I am entirely capable, is that McConnel of Kentucky is reported to have gotten a trillion dollars in pork for his fair state, of one kind or another, in the past ten years. No wonder he was so reluctant to agree to no pork.

Ol' Johnny and Saxby haven't done too well for Georgia, if doing well is getting pork. We are something like 45th in per capita receipt of pork. Is that good or bad?

Indian Joe
|
December 03, 2010
Kevin, I think if you will check your facts you will find the Robert Byrd (D-WVA) is the pork king or maybe I should say was. Go to WVA and you can't go 5 miles without seeing a obert Byrd highway, bridge, building, school, etc. This is not the exclusive jurisdiction of one party or the other, and all of it needs to be stopped. You keep hearing the debt commission talking about lowering or restricting social security, medicare, veteran benefits - but never a word about the waste of these programs. Think it might also be a good idea to put a "travel allowance" on the first family - $200 million for Mrs. Obama and her "family and friends" is ridiculous - and that was just one trip - just last year. And you wonder why the people are so angry and frustrated.
Kevin Toombs
|
December 03, 2010
Rod must really hate former Alaska Sen. (R) Ted Stevens (the all-time king of earmarks) and the Congressional Republicans as a whole from 2000 to 2006 for their wasteful spending. Does that mean they are all liberals? Anyone who claims that it was all military spending is a fool or a hypocrite.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides