Try some political conservatism — Southern style
by Melvyn L. Fein
November 05, 2012 12:00 AM | 1616 views | 6 6 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Last week my wife and I attended a sociological conference in North Georgia. Along the way there we drove past innumerable lawns bedecked in Romney/Ryan signs. When we arrived at our destination, however, the political climate abruptly changed.

As many MDJ readers may know, academics, and especially sociologists, are notoriously liberal. For sociologists, the percentage leaning left is upward of 95 percent, whereas for college faculty in general, it hovers between 80 and 90 percent (depending on how the measurements are taken).

What was different this time around was that enthusiasm for our current president was notably lacking. Most of the participants still intended to vote for Obama, yet no one — not a single soul — attempted to persuade my wife or me that he was superior to Romney.

One of our colleagues epitomized the prevailing attitude. He told a group of us that he had been scandalizing his associates by telling them that he was not going to vote for Obama. He just couldn’t. So whom was he going to support? Why, it was the Green Party candidate.

In fact, nobody in our circle was faintly outraged by this. Even those who were strong Obama supporters sympathized with his decision. After all, they too could not personally imagine voting for a Republican under any circumstances.

As it happened, one of the conference presenters provided survey data on the voting preferences of north Georgians. Her respondents were primarily young — typically college students — but the results confirmed what other researchers have found.

Most people vote as their parents do. This tendency is so robust they frequently support candidates who do not share their values — as long as they come from the correct party. This is true for liberals and conservatives, so it is safe to say that in this respect both factions are conservative.

What also came out of the research is that a majority of voters do not follow the campaigns. Most do not know what the candidates represent because they don’t pay attention. They certainly do not engage in fact-checking to determine if what is promised bears any resemblance to what is liable to be delivered.

It turns out that large numbers of people, including otherwise sophisticated professionals, depend on what they think they already know. This was apparent in an exchange I had with a senior colleague. When I suggested that our society needed to move toward greater decentralization, he strongly demurred.

According to my challenger, we need further centralization because the federal government is the most “efficient” provider of social services. Only it, said he, can do the job. When pressed for evidence, he swiftly cited Social Security.

This reminded me of a conversation I had with another liberal professor several years ago. When asked to identify the chief benefits liberalism provided, he too mentioned Social Security. The other benefit he named was free public education.

The irony is that these are very old ideas that are both now in deep trouble. Thus, Social Security is running out of money as the population ages and those who are working are unable to contribute enough to keep it solvent. Meanwhile, public education has remained stagnant despite our having more than tripled the resources poured into underwriting it.

These programs have demonstrated their worth, yet the time has come for serious reforms. Nevertheless, most liberals refuse to entertain the idea that modifications are necessary. As symbols of their success, they insist that these remain unchanged.

But what is this other than “conservatism?” Liberals like to describe themselves as “progressives.” Yet this evidently does not mean they are prepared to embrace genuinely novel agendas. Like almost everyone else, they prefer to stand by the familiar and comfortable. The same applies when they vote. When the time arrives to cast their ballots, most follow the pathways they always have — no matter what they say. This election will be no different..

Melvyn L. Fein Ph.D. is a professor of Sociology at Kennesaw State University.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Johnny Rivers
November 05, 2012
They move progressivly toward more government and away from personal responsibility since they, at heart, want to live in a Utopian society where everyone is taken care of regardless of effort. Big Brother will take care of my needs and do away witht htose who threaten me.
Kevin Foley
November 05, 2012
I don't know any progressive who believes Social Security or public education aren't in need of reforms.

It takes two to tango and the GOP has been hijacked by tea partiers who reject cooperation and compromise to address these and dozens of other problems facing the country.

As far as embracing "novel agendas," where are they? The only conservative agenda is tax cuts and every man for himself. That's not novel or new.
November 05, 2012
--tea partiers who reject cooperation--

For Foley and other libtards "cooperation" comes about only when everybody else does exactly what the libtards want to do. Anything short of this will inevitably reveal the 'EXTREMISTS"; the "H8TERS" and the "RACISTS". Gotta love those opened minded "progressives".

November 05, 2012
--RE: The only conservative agenda is tax cuts and every man for himself.--

Everyman for himself? But that is exactly what big lib government is all about. You agencies like FEMA making you survive on your own until they decide to get some water to you a week after a hurricane strikes. (Don't nobody care about youse and meese mo' than than dem big liberal gummit folks.)

Is "Foley" by chance French for "doofus"?

Kevin Foley
November 07, 2012
@ anonymous (whoever you are) - No, Romney is French for dufus.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides