TSPLOST defeat shows voters want traffic relief, not transit wish list
by Don McKee
Columnist
August 02, 2012 12:37 AM | 1746 views | 9 9 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Don McKee
Don McKee
slideshow
The TSPLOST didn’t just lose in Cobb and metro Atlanta. It crashed and burned.

A stunning 69 percent of Cobb voters nixed the proposal for a new one-cent regional sales tax purportedly for transportation but really more an economic development plan with lots of local projects chosen by county and city officials as icing on the cake.

The TSPLOST garnered only 38,703 yes votes in Cobb, or 31 percent, swamped by 85,412 no votes. In the 10-county metro area, even Fulton and DeKalb, supposedly the linchpins of support, voted against the TSPLOST. Metrowide the vote was 248,319 in favor, or 37 percent, and 415,526 against, or 63 percent.

With the TSPLOST down the drain, the next question is: will Cobb Chairman Tim Lee survive a runoff with former Chairman Bill Byrne? The rule of thumb is that the incumbent gets all his votes in the primary, but in this race the baggage carried by Byrne may prove to be a major liability despite Lee’s unpopular support of the TSPLOST.

Lee said TSPLOST backers need “to regroup, get together and continue to work to identify a solution for the problem that’s in front of us and that’s the transportation bottlenecks that exist.” Indeed. The TSPLOST plan was fatally flawed because it did not focus on bottlenecks and other congestion problems instead of mass transit and economic development.

TSPLOST opponent Ron Sifen got it right: “Voters figured out that the pro-TSPLOST hype was false and that too much money was going to benefit special interests but would not reduce traffic congestion.” He was also right about Plan B, if there is one, requiring that funds be spent to “effectively reduce traffic congestion.”

There were just too many negatives starting with locked-in 10 years of added sales tax. A big non-starter was the $689 million “enhanced premium transit service” for Cobb, which was subject to morphing into light rail — depending on a study to be completed long after the referendum. On top of that, Cobb could have been outvoted by the other counties in the region and then be saddled with the 10-year tax against its will.

Another blunder was name-calling and down-putting of opponents — Tim Lee calling them spoiled brats or racists, and a consultant trashing Cobb for “racializing” MARTA. You could say the last straw was Secretary of State Brian Kemp’s unauthorized preamble to the ballot question, portraying the TSPLOST as providing “local transportation projects to create jobs and reduce traffic congestion.”

It turns out that voters are not quite as dumb as some of the sponsors of the TSPLOST apparently thought they were. Gov. Nathan Deal said defeat of the tax was disappointing, but he said state officials will now focus on the most pressing needs. There will be a “need to do” transportation improvement list, he said, but not a “want to do” list. Now that’s an excellent starting point. Metro Atlanta citizens want improved transportation — not a mass transit wish list or a pig in a poke.

dmckee9613@aol.com
Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
nosplost
|
August 13, 2012
the whole tsplost scam--just a corrupt money grab by connected politicians, developers, land owners, etc.---a new way to get richer with all those taxpayer billions. it had nothing to do with traffic or "jobs" --- just more money for those in power.
misterbill
|
August 03, 2012
Don took a lot of heat over time from the TSPLOST supporters. I want to thank him for keeping us aware of the events over that time period.

I believe it made us aware of many facts that resulted in the defeat of the plan that would enrich a few, tax the many and accomplish little.

Thank you, Don.
anonymous
|
August 02, 2012
A comment from Nathan Deal this AM indicated that he backed the TSPLOST because it was launched before he was elected and he felt he should see it through. Sounded like he was trying to put the blame on the previous administration instead of taking a stand on his own beliefs. Excuses,excuses.
Matt Coleman
|
August 02, 2012
Don McKee has written an excellent summary of why this bill was defeated -- it didn't address any real problem. Even the supposedly "balanced" dialog in the Sunday, July 29 issue of the AJ&C showed that those who were "pro" TSPLOST talked about jobs and mass transit and those who were opposed talked facts (only 3.5% of all commuters in Atlanta use mass transit and there are plenty of seats available.) We need improved roads -- in many cases we need the simple addition of "flyovers" at huge intersections so we can get around the north metro area -- we don't need mass transit or light rail to take us to non-existent jobs in downtown Atlanta.
Sign on a Car
|
August 02, 2012
It said: "Dear Tea Party: Thanks so much for killing the T-SPLOST. Enjoy looking at this sign as you sit in traffic for the next 10 years."
TIC
|
August 02, 2012
I suspect that about 70% of the people who look at that sign will just laugh.

They may still be sitting in traffic, but at least they aren't wasting $8.5 BILLION for that honor.

Now that would be frustrating.!!
Matt Coleman
|
August 02, 2012
There was nothing in the TSPLOST that would have helped any commuter in Cobb using I-75. It was all delusional mass transit projects designed to force people to commute to the center of Atlanta. There was nothing that would have provided mass transit that would take someone from Marietta to the business areas all along the north of I-285 (where all the jobs are.) It was simply liberal social engineering trying to save the dying core of Atlanta.
FantasyWorld
|
August 02, 2012
If you really want to force people who work in Downtown, Midtown and Buckhead onto MARTA just close down all of the parking garages and parking lots in those areas.

Simple.
Off Balance
|
August 02, 2012
If I see you I will toot or wave and express my thanks for your gratitude.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides