Ron Paul: Political Pied Piper
by Melvyn_Fein
February 24, 2012 02:45 PM | 5261 views | 2 2 comments | 285 285 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
Asked to describe himself in one word during the last Republican debate, Ron Paul made a fair choice.  He characterized himself as: “consistent.”  If anything, this is a moderate way of portraying his resistance to intellectual change.

That a man Paul’s age can have such a simplistic view of the universe surely disqualifies him from being president.  That he has the audacity to boast of having learned almost nothing in his many decades on this planet is breathtaking.  It clearly tells us that he does not have the flexibility to deal with chief executive level uncertainties.

Nonetheless Paul may not really want to be president.  As others have suggested, his real goal may be to spark a social movement.  He may be satisfied if he can make libertarianism more respectable.  If so, he may serve an important political purpose.

Libertarianism is much too simple-minded for my tastes.  It purports to explain most of the problems confronting us with a few timeless propositions.  Whatever the difficulty, it deduces the answers from a limited set of axioms.

Mind you, I agree with the libertarians about the pivotal importance of freedom and the need to defend the integrity of the marketplace and the constitution.  I, however, believe in learning from experience—which sometimes indicates that theory must be modified by reality.

This said, I am beginning to understand that Paul’s crusade may have long-term benefits.  His adolescent posturing turns off most people my age, but adolescents, and those only shortly removed from adolescence, are inspired by it.  For them, he is a pied piper who is playing an irresistible tune.

Obviously, the young have little experience with the real world.  Perhaps, less obviously, most experience a reasonable anxiety when they contemplate their futures.  If one does not know why many things happen as they do, an uncertainty regarding what constitutes the best choices is sensible.

As a result, the young are attracted to answers they can get their minds around.  Simplified ideologies of the sort Paul peddles provide this kind of certitude.  They are easily understood and purport to explain everything one might want to know.  This is dangerous for those who must make responsible decisions, but it is a useful starting point for those who have the time to learn.

If this is true, then Paul’s campaign may prove a valuable entry point to a conservative perspective.  Young people are idealistic.  They crave a sense of being able to reform the world.  Fervent ideologies give them a feeling of doing good.  Libertarianism may be over-blown, but it provides the passion the young desire.

Fortunately, life furnishes the lessons needed to become more realistic.  Most of us become disillusioned as our ideals collide with the hard facts of everyday living.  For some this leads to bitterness, whereas for others it is a portal to more competent decision-making.

Therefore, under the best of circumstances, many of today’s young may become tomorrow’s well-grounded conservatives.  If so, Paul, in increasing the number of the young who experiment with libertarianism, may be recruiting the core of those who eventually protect our democratic institutions from destruction.

In other words, let’s hope Paul energizes enough right wing idealists to counteract Obama’s left wing idealists.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
March 01, 2012
It seems a bit disingenuous to attack Paul's ideology without pointing out, or engaging with, any specific one of his policies. Is it his support for the strict interpretation of the constitution you disagree with? Or maybe his stance against the series of disastrous wars we have been fighting, or is it his plan to audit and reign in the federal reserve? You are maybe for big government?

I certainly do not agree with all of this policies, but yes, because he is 'consistent' he is a known quantity, unlike any of the other candidates. Take Obama, who ran as a liberal, has shown his true colors as basically a neo-con in a liberal's clothing. How can I now that any of the republican candidates wouldn't do the same?

Who can tell the substantive difference between the proposed polices of Romney, Gingrich, or Santorum? From a casual perspective they are identical, take your pick of whoever you like personally. Unlike Obama, who promised reform and has done none, I have no doubt Paul would engage in reform from day one. For my money Paul's policies are the best offer among the existing candidates'. Even if I disagree with some of his policies, at least I am under no illusion about what he will do as president because of his consistency.

- From a former student who thoroughly enjoyed your classes
February 28, 2012
I guess as old as you are you have`nt learned anything yet.As always a newspaper bloggers misinformed views are scattered across the page for all to see.If you would ever once listen to someone other than yourself you might learn something.Dr.Paul is trying to win,but the media will say he is not over and over trying to make it so.His views do come from having seen many things in his long life either work or not.His policy is to apply the very things that are known to work and to get rid of the things that don`t.But don`t take my word for it,research for yourself and then have the facts for your next article.CHEERS
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides