Oh, shut up ... And Put America First!
by Matt Towery
June 02, 2013 10:46 PM | 762 views | 1 1 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Matt Towery
Matt Towery
slideshow
Last week, I listened to a loud, obnoxious woman interrupt the president of the United States numerous times during a speech on national security. She is the leader of the group Code Pink. They oppose war and the use of drones, and generally push a super-left-of-center view on everything from “green jobs” to health care.

It would be more than fair to say this column does not devote huge amounts of space to praising President Obama. But stick with me here because there is more to this piece than what should be the obvious — the obvious being that no matter who serves as our president, we should never stand for the rude interruption and verbal assault of our nation’s leader.

Obama held his cool while the woman questioned, in essence, why Gitmo remains open. I guess she has a point given the president’s longtime promise to close the facility — a promise he should have never made. But really, some whiney, holier-than-thou who believes she has some special right to interrupt the president and ruin an event for everyone else, give me a break.

In rebuking this sort of assault on our president, I’m not putting the president on a pedestal. I’m not even endorsing any of his policies. But I am saying that we should all put America ahead of our partisanship and our political philosophies. I’m sure the Code Pink organization would argue the right to freedom of speech in rudely interrupting our elected leader. But what if everyone in a room full of people listening to a president they might disagree with started to heckle and question him constantly throughout a policy address? The answer is that presidents would no longer give public speeches.

Or perhaps the president would be strong enough to do what Ronald Reagan did during a campaign speech in 1980 to a heckler in the crowd and simply say, “Oh, shut up!” That heckler was never heard from again.

Ironically, despite the left of left position that the big mouth at Code Pink has in basically opposing any U.S. involvement in any wars, I am led to a broader and far less Code Pink conclusion.

Yes, Code Pink, I’m also tired of Americans fighting in wars overseas. I would be thrilled to never again see another American mother or father have to watch their young son or daughter leave for a potentially hazardous far-away land. We just paused to remember far too many Americans who gave up their lives so that old big mouth could heckle the president and exercise her freedom of speech, or of the right to a have a super cool self-image of a pseudointellectual, activist, liberal, above-civility jerk.

But hey, why stop there? Every time I see a homeless person carrying a coat in the hot weather because it’s part of the collection of few belongings he or she must cling to for the days when the cold sets in, I wonder why tax dollars go flying out of this nation to countries around the world that hate our guts. If I’m to be taxed to death and hassled by the IRS, let it be for the reason of clothing and feeding Americans at home, not the rest of the world.

And every time I read of an immigrant who comes to our shores and is given the opportunity to attend a high-end school, as was the case with our lovely Boston Marathon bomber, I wonder why some kid who has lived in public housing and never had a chance to escape didn’t get that scholarship or break, instead. I’m sure Code Pink would oppose the kid even getting the chance to attend a charter school.

And when it comes to disaster relief, where are all the donations and people from other countries helping the folks in Oklahoma who were devastated by the storms of last week or those left to languish from Sandy last year? Some people who received help from the government years ago, after Hurricane Katrina, are now being chased down by their government, which is claiming their monetary help was a loan that they must repay.

Yes, Code Pink, I don’t want any more Americans in foreign wars, either. But likely for a different reason. It’s not because I don’t believe in defending our nation. And it’s not for some late-1960s VW van throwback, feel-good, peace sign moment.

It’s because I’m tired of seeing great young Americans fight and die in dusty, nasty lands where the people we “liberate” hate us just as much as their oppressors. All to defend the “right” for the lady from Code Pink to run her mouth at will and interrupt our president — even if he doesn’t know when to say, “Oh, shut up.”

Matt Towery heads the polling and political information firm InsiderAdvantage.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
East Cobb Senior
|
June 03, 2013
Matt, while I agree that a certain amount of etiquette should be afforded to the President, etiquette and courtesy is a two way street. When a President willfully calls out and embarrasses Supreme Court Justices, in a venue where they can't simply say "shut up" you lying charlatan, then Obama invites a powerful member of the Congress, Chairman of the House Budget Committee, to speech knowing full well he was going to publicly chastise and humiliate, there is a "what goes around comes around" here.



Although I vehemently disagree with Code Pink and their ultra-liberal agenda, Obama has his handlers so insulate him from forms and audiences that could expose him to critics, that there a few opportunities to express directly the frustration with his lies, failed promises and anti-American policies and agenda. This was one speech where they were unsuccessful.

Obama, through his Chicago style politics and thuggery, has attempted and in many instances succeeded, using agencies of the Federal Government, to politically intimidate, harass and squash anyone or organization that opposes or is critical of him personally or his policies.



In answer to your immigrant getting benefits while the public housing kid has no chance to escape, look no further than to Obama and the Democrats and their perpetuation of the welfare state. This schema is motivated entirely for political expediency, "haves" verses the "have not's". Class warfare is and has been a primary tactic in the political game plan of Democrats.



As for our "Foreign Aid", it should be, reward our friends and punish our enemies, not the antithesis, which is the policy of this administration.

Yes, the Office of the President should be afforded respect, but with an occupant who's arrogant, condescending, imperial and egotistical attitude is so blatantly in your face it's sometimes difficult to get through that and recognize that he in fact holds the office.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides