New law requires cameras in pawn shops
by Nikki Wiley
July 26, 2013 11:49 PM | 3924 views | 1 1 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA — Pawn shop owners and precious metal dealers soon will have to do more to keep the police in the loop after the Cobb Board of Commissioners approved a new pawn ordinance.

The ordinance will require pawn and precious metals store owners to participate in an online digital database that gives police access to information and photos of pawn store inventory and customers.

Some business owners called the provision of the ordinance that requires photographing customers an invasion of privacy and raised opposition at public hearings.

Still, the commission passed it unanimously after hearing from a Cobb County police officer who oversees cases dealing with pawn shop and precious metals stores.

The new ordinance will make it easier for the police to find thieves looking to make a quick buck by selling stolen property, said Detective Pat Sullivan. Previously, store owners kept photographs of inventory, fingerprints of their customers and other documents and submitted a daily report to police. That left police responsible for the upkeep of software.

“I was installing and maintaining it,” Sullivan said. “Doable with 10 stores. Not doable with 95 stores.”

Commissioner Bob Ott said he understands concerns about privacy.

“What is of more concern to me is how the information is protected,” Ott said.

No federally maintained system exists, so police must use a private contractor for the service.

The ordinance says the police chief or his designee will choose the database, and a fee for each transaction reported through the system will be charged to each pawn shop by the contracted company. That fee is not known yet because it is based on the contract, yet to be negotiated, between the vendor and the county.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Tim Busby
July 30, 2013
The concept warrants discussion but what I don't understand is how a board of commissioners can implement a course of action without knowing the cost to the business. It appears to me if the city of Marietta was incurring the cost I would certainly hope as their obligation to the taxpayers they would know the cost of anything prior to obligating themselves and the taxpayers to that expenditure. I believe the pawnbrokers deserve the same consideration.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides