Goldstein, Tumlin remain in dispute over who owns road
by Nikki Wiley
November 17, 2013 10:51 PM | 3306 views | 3 3 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA — A 4,000-square foot stretch of road remains at the middle of a long-running dispute between Councilman Philip Goldstein and Mayor Steve Tumlin.

It’s a back-and-forth argument over who owns the small piece of property at the former Coca-Cola bottling plant on Roswell Street that seems simple at the first glance but is inundated with technicalities and legalese.

Goldstein says an error on a deed — which the city calls a scrivener’s error — means he still owns the property a company he bought out of bankruptcy, Emerson LLC, purchased before he owned it.

The error listed the owner of the property as Emerson Development LLC instead of Emerson LLC, which are two separate companies.

“All I’m trying to do is get to where it’s properly deeded to the city,” Goldstein said.

But Tumlin says it’s already the city’s property.

City Council voted Wednesday night to deny Goldstein’s quitclaim deed that would have transferred ownership of the property to the city.

Goldstein said he didn’t see any harm in the city accepting the deed when he addressed the council during its public comment period.

Tumlin maintains accepting the deed would open the city up to conflicts in the future.

“It was listed as if it was a gift, and we disagree with that,” Tumlin said.

It “won’t be the last scrivener’s error,” Tumlin said, and the city should not treat a councilman any differently than it would treat a resident.

The issue was brought forward about six months ago, Tumlin said, and came back “out of nowhere.”

Goldstein received a property tax bill for the property, but when he brought up the donation earlier this year before the City Council, Goldstein said City Attorney Doug Haynie told the Cobb Board of Tax Assessors to remove Goldstein’s LLC as the owner of the property.

Initially, it was done, but Goldstein said it was placed back in the LLC’s name.

Goldstein received a refund check for the property taxes and returned that to the city, he said, claiming he is still the rightful owner and owed the taxes.

Property taxes are part of the donation. If Goldstein gets the property off his hands, he won’t be liable for the taxes. He could also claim the donation as a deduction on his property taxes. Tumlin told the MDJ earlier this month that deduction could be $400,000.

Goldstein says he’s agreed not to take any deductions.

“The 400 and some odd thousand is not a figure that’s ever been out there from this side. That’s what you call — what’s a good word for that — political grandstanding on the mayor’s part. Let me rephrase that. That’s theatrics,” Goldstein said. “I specifically stated that I would agree not to take a deduction.”

He maintains it’s just about clearing up an error.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Justin Cayce
December 06, 2013
It is time for Goldstein to find another town to fleece !!!

If you voted for Goldstein, you are part of the problem.
November 18, 2013
Oh, we go again with (yet) another Gold$tein "issue" about money.

Doesn't he get along with anybody?
Guido Sarducci
November 19, 2013
Seems to me that Goldstein is willing to quit claim the property to the city, but Tumlin, for some reason, is not willing to accept that.

There does not appear to be any money in contention here.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides