Gingrey making run for Senate
by Bill Barrow
Associated Press Writer
March 27, 2013 11:55 PM | 3881 views | 10 10 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
AP File Photo
<br>
AP File Photo
slideshow
AUGUSTA — U.S. Rep. Phil Gingrey says he is running for the Senate, making the Marietta Republican the second congressman to enter what promises to be a fierce fight for the rare open seat created by Saxby Chambliss’s upcoming retirement.

“Faithfully I have championed our conservative Georgia values, and still yet I feel called to do even more,” Gingrey said, flanked by his wife, mother and two brothers.

Gingrey, a 70-year-old obstetrician-gynecologist, made his announcement in Augusta, where he grew up and later attended medical school. He was also scheduled to speak in Atlanta later Wednesday.

He joins Paul Broun of Athens in the GOP primary field, giving the race two conservative physicians who promise to highlight the party’s most conservative wing as Republicans try to defend their advantage in Georgia. U.S. Reps. Tom Price of Roswell and Jack Kingston of Savannah are considering the race, as well.

Rep. John Barrow, meanwhile, could give Democrats their strongest opportunity for a pick-up as the party tries to maintain its Senate majority in 2014, but the Augusta congressman hasn’t tipped his hand. Whoever their candidate is, Democrats are banking on a free-for-all among Republicans. “The possibility of primary, and a messy one at that, is now real,” said Justin Barasky, spokesman at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in Washington.

Gingrey didn’t mention Broun in his remarks, instead taking the safe route by framing his candidacy with customary Republican orthodoxy.

He promised to trim the federal debt, repeal President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, fight a citizenship path for illegal immigrants and continue his opposition to abortion rights. He called Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada “opportunity thieves” guilty of “incompetence and inaction.”

But Gingrey offered no specifics on closing the government’s annual operating deficit. He called for “entitlement reform,” but did not specifically mention Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid, the U.S. government’s three largest safety net programs that together account for more than 60 percent of federal spending.

He called for “expanding the base” of tax revenues. In GOP parlance, that reference is usually linked to some kind of national consumption tax or income tax changes, such as rolling back the Earned Income Tax Credit, that would make more American households pay federal income tax, in addition to whatever Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes they might pay. Yet Gingrey quickly added his opposition to raising taxes on any American.

Gingrey was elected in 2002 to represent parts of suburban Atlanta and northwest Georgia. He served previously as a state legislator and local school board member.

The Georgia Senate race could highlight the ongoing Republican struggle between anti-establishment, tea party conservatives and the old-guard GOP more identified with the chamber of commerce crowd.

The difficult balance of courting voters across that spectrum is already on display.

Gingrey is generally viewed as a mainstream social and fiscal conservative. But he drew negative attention recently when he defended failed Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin’s infamous claim that a woman’s body can avoid pregnancy from a “legitimate rape.” Gingrey, speaking as an obstetrician, said his former House colleague was “partly right.” But the doctor has since backtracked, telling The Atlanta Journal-Constitution his comments were “stupid.”

“I made a very awkward attempt to explain the unexplainable,” he told the newspaper for a March 11 report.

On Wednesday, Gingrey mentioned his anti-abortion credentials before venturing any thoughts on the nation’s finances. And he used his obstetrics career — he says he delivered more than 5,200 babies — as a pillar of his values.

Broun, meanwhile, is an unabashed darling of the right, including many Christian evangelicals who are important in Republican primaries. Broun’s congressional ads showed him shooting hunting rifles, and he frequently speaks at churches, including an appearance last year when he called evolutionary theory “lies from the pit of hell.”

Unlike Gingrey, Broun hasn’t attempted to smooth over his comments. Yet he also opted not to mention social issues at all in his recent announcement and has used most of his public comments since to repeat his promise to fight against “out-of-control government spending” — a mantra he says cuts across party and ideological labels.

Broun has also railed against budget proposals from the Republican leadership, saying they don’t go far enough — an uncomfortable position for Gingrey and others to match, given that they don’t usually publicly criticize the chamber’s GOP leadership.

Gingrey starts his campaign with a solid financial footing. He reported almost $1.9 million balance in his House campaign account to start the year. Broun reported $155,567. Price had nearly $1.6 million, while Kingston was just shy of $1 million.

Chambliss spent $15.7 million during his 2008 re-election year, and Sen. Johnny Isakson spent $7.5 million winning a new term in 2010.
Comments
(10)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
maylib
|
April 25, 2013
"Our country has not yet recovered from the damage done to it by social security" - Phil Gingrey.

True story. Phil said this on one of his townhall calls several years ago. I couldn't believe it when I heard it.

You want to know how he feels about "reforming" entitlements? There's your answer
Lifetime Cobber
|
March 28, 2013
For someone who has practiced reproductive medicine for 30 plus years, you'd think he'd know something about contraception, especially in the cases of rape. "Yeah, if you get 'legitimately' raped, you don't need an abortion, just TELL your body not to get pregnant." I'm paraphrasing, but seriously, What a quack!

The guy is a slimy politician who's been in power 10 years too many. Phil, you're 70 years old! Retire already.
John Galt
|
March 28, 2013
His support of Medicare Part D, the indefinite detention of American Citizens and the Iraq War make him a no go for me!
necobbmom
|
March 28, 2013
He needs to retire. Time for some fresh new ideas.
long time observer
|
March 28, 2013
Gingrey is as much connected to the reality of his constituents as the color of his hair. The only people he does proud are his plastic surgeons and cosmetic dentists.
anonymous
|
March 28, 2013
"Gingrey didn’t mention Broun in his remarks, instead taking the safe route by framing his candidacy with customary Republican orthodoxy."

"Republican orthodoxy," that translates to the mindthink of the Republican establishment.

Gingrey probably wants to join Isakson, for dinner with Obama.

No thanks! Gingrey is a RINO!
I16
|
March 27, 2013
70 years plus 6 if elected, would make you 76 years old, at the end of your first term.

I suggest that if you don't want to retire, come on back to Marietta and birth some more babies.

Give the 1.8 million to some one who can win.
Watcher....
|
March 27, 2013
I know that Heath Garrett wants the term to disappear, but Phil Gingrey is a "RINO!"
Just Sayin'....
|
March 27, 2013
Really???? Note to self....remind Phil it is time to retire.
wrongway
|
April 26, 2013
I believe he is a great family man, but he has been out of touch for some time in Congress, this is a good reason we need term limits. We need someone new and fresh.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides