Elderly woman gets 3 years in death of girl, 5
by Kathryn Malone
kmalone@mdjonline.com
Jan 24, 2011 | 5749 views | 38 38 comments | 24 24 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Edith Anderson, above, sits in her wheelchair at the defense table as she listens to Cobb Police Officer James Dahlquist, lead investigator at the accident scene, describe the path of her car which struck and later killed 5-year-old Karla Campos during her plea agreement hearing and sentencing on Monday morning. <br> Photo by Laura Moon
view slideshow (4 images)
MARIETTA - An 83-year-old woman who struck and killed 5-year-old Karla Campos while she was walking off a school bus in December 2009 was sentenced to three years in prison and 12 years probation after pleading guilty to vehicular homicide in an emotional hearing Monday.

As part of her sentence, Anderson will never be able to drive again.

Arriving in court in a wheelchair, Edith Anderson, who was 82 at the time of the crash, took the stand and told the Campos family she knows she is responsible for the death of their "beautiful little girl."

"I wanted to tell Karla's family that I know that she was a beautiful little girl who loved Dora the Explorer and chocolate," Anderson said. "And because of me, she's no longer with us, and because of me, her family will suffer the pain of her loss for the rest of their lives. And I hate that. And I'm so sorry, and I just hope the time I spend in jail will give them some measure of closure."

Karla Campos' mother, Gloria Velazquez, and her father Martin Campos, both took the stand during the hearing and through a translator said that living without their little girl has been extremely difficult.

"My life has been devastated since the death of Karla," Velazquez said through tears. "Our family has not returned to be the same as it was. Everything has changed during this year that we've been without her ... Our family tries everyday to continue living together, even though we don't have her with us anymore."

Anderson was expected to plead not guilty and the case was slated to go to trial. But on Friday afternoon, she called her attorneys and said she didn't want to put the Campos family through a trial, her attorney Corey Stern said.

Velazquez said she and her husband have two other children, a 3-year-old and a 1-year-old. The 1-year-old was born just weeks before Karla Campos' death.

The 3-year-old, she said, still asks about Karla and doesn't understand what happened to her.

"(He) asks about Karla," Velazquez said. "And to this day, even though he's undergoing therapy, he still doesn't know where she is. He keeps asking, 'when will Karla come home?' He misses Karla."

Because of Anderson's age and the fact that she didn't have a criminal record or a history of reckless driving, her defense team, Stern, Carrie Hackett and Natalie Woodward of Woodward and Stern, LLC of Roswell, asked for her sentence to be served on probation.

Anderson was charged with two counts of vehicular homicide, one count of failure to stop for a school bus and one count of reckless driving.

Assistant District Attorney Jason Marbutt, who got choked up during his closing statement, asked Superior Court Judge Adele Grubbs to sentence Anderson to 15 years, the maximum sentence for vehicular homicide, with the stipulation that she never be able to drive again.

Although Anderson's driver's license was revoked after the crash, she said she applied for a new license and received one in July 2010, to prove that she is not an incompetent driver. She said she has not driven since the December 2009 accident, except for during her driver's test.

Stern said she hasn't driven because she is "scared to death of getting back on the road."

During her testimony on Monday, when asked if she'd be willing to surrender her driver's license, Anderson replied: "Yes, if it's required."

Since the crash, Anderson said she's had "a lot of sleepless nights" and "a lot of guilt-filled days." But she did not shed any tears when recounting the details of the crash that led to Karla Campos' death.

Anderson testified that on the afternoon of Dec. 9, 2009, as she was driving on Davis Road, she approached a stopped school bus with several cars behind it, and took her foot off the accelerator to let the car slow down naturally. Then, as she got closer to the stopped car ahead of her, she went to put her foot on what she thought was the brake, and instead, hit the accelerator. When she realized she was going to hit the car in front of her, Anderson said, she turned to the right to avoid the car.

"I turned to the right and took the only opening I saw to avoid striking the car, which unfortunately was the walkway where the children were descending from the bus," Anderson said. "And unfortunately, Karla stepped down just as I passed. And after I realized my mistake, I took my foot off my accelerator and applied the brake."

Velazquez said she was just two steps away from her daughter, waiting for her to get off the bus, when she was hit by Anderson's car.

Officer James Dahlquist, the lead investigator in the case, testified Monday that Anderson traveled about 361 feet - more than the length of a football field - after she turned her car to the right and left the road to avoid hitting the school bus.

Marbutt pointed out that not only did Anderson hit the brakes too late, she never used to horn to signal that she had lost control of her car.

In her sentencing, Grubbs said that she did take Anderson's age and the fact that she had never been in trouble with the law before into account, but took issue with several things Anderson said in her testimony. Grubbs said she was concerned about the fact that Anderson confused the brake and accelerator, but said the biggest issue is that she didn't readily concede her driver's license, and that she had actually applied for and received a new one.

"I can't have that," Grubbs said to Anderson. "She needs to understand that she should never, ever drive again."

To the Campos family, Grubbs said: "I hope this will help. There is no closure, but I personally know that peace will come."
Comments
(38)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
B C Davis
|
October 12, 2011
People you should all be judges....You seem to do it so well. It is a terrible thing. But if you were to judge the correct way it would be to look at both sides. I've had incounters with both issues in my life. My step son was killed at age 6 while crossing the street. It was an elderly man who then had a heart attack but lived. I watched his father yell at God, and got jealous when a stranger came to the funeral home to comfort the Mother and didn't even know anything about the accident.

It was an accident.

I also had a Grandfather who was going blind but didn't want to give up his privledge to drive (short distances) because of the erra he was raised in. That would mean he was less of a man. After he rode down the Austell Rd.'s MILLION Dollar concrete median a short distance, we decided it was time. I then took care of his trips for him but he was never the same because he always took us everywhere when I was a child. That was the highlite of the visits. Always to the "country" we would go, (Canton) He never was the same after he was restricted and developed cancer and passed away shortly after. I know the woman feels terrible and if it was a younger person I would feel different about the punishment (although it probably wouldn't have happened unless the person was dui) This woman probably doesnt have very much longer to live. It was an accident, She's already living thru hell daily, I don't think jail is the answer. Everyone knows that not everyone gets the same punishment...That's a FACT. I pray for the family of the little girl. I would be angry at first but sometimes things happen we can't explain. One day it will be revealed. Wheather you believe in God or not. All things will be answered someday.

REMEMBER THIS: My Favorite Quote

"Cowardice asks the question: is it safe? Expediency asks the question: is it political? Vanity asks the question: is it popular? But conscience asks the question: is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor political, nor popular - but one must take it simply because it is right." Martin Luther King, Jr

Bless The Little Children and the Elderly

Because w/o them we would be no more...

We learn from the old and give to the new.

Jh1241
|
April 23, 2011
Honor the little girl with forgiveness not vengence. It was an accident. The courts made the right decision.
James2545
|
April 23, 2011
You people can't be serious harrassing an elderly woman because of an accident. She was clearly remorseful and did not intend to kill this child. I think the sentense was more than appropriate for the situation and for once I think the justice system made a good decision in releasing this woman. I'm pretty sure she would give anything to bring this child back if she could. I can't believe that the media has become such a lynch mob of heartless unforgiving canibals. I can't believe that there are some people that are so unforgiving including the family. If you want to honor this little girls death do it with forgiveness not vengence.
anonymous
|
February 03, 2011
I sure wish we could all be as enlightened as "Think Before Talking" so we can make bigotted statements and use big words, too. He/she must be from some northern area that are so noted for their compassion and love for one another. Boston maybe?
Enough Already
|
February 03, 2011
She should have got 20 years just like the man last year that killed a person while driving home dunk. She would be safer and better cared for there, anyway.
Uncle Arthur
|
January 26, 2011
If I ever get sent to Judge Grubbs' courtroom, I'll be sure to whine and weep my way through the proceedings so she might have a little pity on me!
Ted Sheckler
|
January 26, 2011
The real question on this blog for the people like DWWD, Reasoned, aint soft on crime, Think before talking is : (other than that they are probably the same person) - if this lady had driven on the sidewalk and run over and killed your 5 year old little girl, would you be so quick to defend her and demand that she not go to jail? Please enlighten us. As for Think Before Talking, so anyone that disagrees with you is a redneck because they support human life and think you should be held accountable for your actions. If we used your thinking, all rapists, murders, etc would be allowed to roam the streets without fear of incarceration. I'm glad you're not a judge.
Not H. Austin
|
January 26, 2011
Hey DWWD, so will you be preaching no jail time if someone drives on a sidewalk and runs over your child and doesn't stop for another 361 feet? I highly doubt it. It is insane how you can call what this woman did just an "accident." Please seek help.
DWWD
|
January 26, 2011


It is a disgrace sending an elderly woman to jail because of a vehicular accident – as bad as it was. She was not speeding, drinking or acting in an otherwise negligent manner. Serving jail time by the accused will not repair the emotional suffering by either party involved with this tragic event. This should be a civil case, there was no intent to commit a crime or break the law here. Accidents occur everyday and no one is exempt. You could be next --- you’re not infallible. Given the elderly age (83) of the convicted woman, house arrest would have more than appropriate. This is an abuse of discretion and authority by Judge Grubbs who is obviously emotionally connected to the case for extraneous reasons.. The proscuter, like most, only trying to put more points on the board – no discretion here….just like robots. A sad day for Georgia legislature.

Minty Fresh
|
January 25, 2011
So sad for the family of the child.

So glad that this menance/murderer is off the streets.
ModernPatriot
|
January 25, 2011
After reading the code section, 3 years to serve is the minimum sentence for Vehicular Homicide (a felony). She received the minimum time to serve, plus probation that she'll probably not live through.
Horrible case
|
January 25, 2011
I feel badly for both sides in this case. I think it is sad that people are knocking an 83 year old woman who has no criminal history. Yes, she should not have been driving, but unfortunately it is next to impossible to take a senior citizens license away. What I find horrible is that she received a stiffer sentence than all the second and third offender drunk drivers. I am sorry for the Campos family, but they are illegal and should be deported for breaking the laws of immigration. I highly doubt their son is asking for his sister due to the fact that he was only two when she was killed. That was a simpathy ploy. I have personally hit the gas when my foot slipped off the break. This woman had an ACCIDENT. Maybe the judge and lawyers should focus on all of the drunk illegals killing people on our streets and leave an 83 year old woman alone!
shockedteacher
|
January 25, 2011
I can't even finish reading these posts. A 5 YEAR OLD LITTLE GIRL DIED!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yes accidents happen, but you pay for those as well. She was a beautiful girl and an amazing student. You should be ashamed of yourself. She's lived 83 YEARS...Karla got 5......
ain't soft on crime
|
January 25, 2011
Cobb County resident and Patrick Bateman, lets pray that your driving never ends in an unintentional tragedy...and hope that guys like you are not on the jury when it comes sentencing time.

Think Before Talking
|
January 25, 2011
I am intrigued by the lack of common sense people use when posting comments. The number of redneck, throw away the key, types astonishes me. Larry: she didn't commit murder. Murder is planned. Know what you're talking about before you talk. To all you brotherly type God fearing people in the south, get a clue what it means to "walk a mile in someone's shoes." Patrick Bateman: You have NO clue the state of panic at the moment, which made her drive the extra footage before stopping. Uncle ted: have you ever driven over the speed limit? If you have, perhaps you need to just sit quietly and stop judging. I'm not AT ALL saying there shouldn't be a consequence. I'm saying that the level and rhetoric that is displayed by some of you helps people understand why the people of this area are truly considered rednecks. Sure, and let's allow talking on a cell phone while driving to remain legal. What's wrong with this picture?
DWWD
|
January 25, 2011
It is a disgrace sending an elderly woman to jail because of a vehicular accident – as bad as it was. She was not speeding, drinking or acting in an otherwise negligent manner. Serving jail time by the accused will not repair the emotional suffering by either party involved in this tragic event. This should be a civil case, there was no intent to commit a crime or break the law here. Accidents occur everyday and no one is exempt. You could be next --- you’re not infallible. Given the elderly age (83) of the convicted woman, house arrest would have more than appropriate. This is an abuse of discretion and authority by Judge Grubbs who is obviously emotionally connected to the case for extraneous reasons. The proscuter, like most, only trying to put more points on the board – no discretion here….just like robots. A sad day for Georgia legislature.

Lawyer1
|
January 25, 2011
Contrary to what some have said, the judge did not have "her hands tied." She could have, and should have, sentenced this woman to straight probation. In fact, this case was, at best, a MISDEMEANOR. Misdemeanor vehicular homicide cases are prosecuted all the time in this state where the death is the accidental result of a simple traffic violation - as was the case here. It is tragic that a child was killed. But it was a tragic accident. Everyone from the police, to the DA, to the ADA who wanted 15 years for her in prison, to the judge should be ashamed of themselves for this injustice.
Reasoned
|
January 25, 2011
To Walter Little & Patrick Bateman- Ms. Anderson had not been found guilty of a crime until she appeared in court Monday, so her license would not have been suspended. Being charged with something & being found guilty are entirely two different things. If the state of GA DMV suspended someone's license while they waited for their day in court, and then they were found innocent, would that have been correct for them to have been punished for months for something that they did not so? No.

To Bateman- her license was not taken away when the accident occured, so she did nothing wrong, legally, renewing her driver's license. And no, I am not a member of the Anderson family & do not know her or anyone in her family at all.
Hugh Jackmen
|
January 25, 2011
Blame the system for giving this 82 woman a license without passing the driving test. Make people pass the test again and not just reapply.
Patrick Bateman
|
January 25, 2011
It looks like Ms. Anderson's family are busy on this blog today. It isn't just a simple mistake when you run over a child and don't stop immediately. She drove 361 ft (football field) length on the sidewalk before stopping. Also, after getting her license taking away she immediately applied for another one. Yeah, this really sounds like someone who feels bad for what she has done. She killed a child and deserves to rot in jail.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides