When I saw “Scientific Illiteracy” in the headline for Ryan Bays’ letter in Wednesday’s MDJ, I looked forward to getting more science-based information with which I could develop an informed judgment on climate-change.
I was disappointed.
What Mr. Bays’ letter demonstrates is his excellent vocabulary, but no information with which he refutes any of the “deniers’” points.
Until Bays can explain how 17 years with no increase in overall global temperatures fits the “current understanding of climate change,” he should, at least, reserve judgment.
Mr. Bays also might find it interesting to look into how many of the most vocal advocates with Ph.D.’s in climate science have their funding grants from entities that benefit from the perception that climate change is caused by mankind.