City officials again hold off vote on skybridge at Kennestone
by Nikki Wiley
April 10, 2014 04:00 AM | 3302 views | 4 4 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Andy Morris
Andy Morris
MARIETTA — City officials voted Wednesday to again postpone making any decisions about a 20-foot pedestrian bridge across Church Street proposed by WellStar Health System. But even after putting the verdict off, they aren’t optimistic the hospital can appease its protesters.

The City Council voted, 6-1, with Councilman Andy Morris voting against, on Wednesday to delay making any decisions about WellStar’s request for an easement to air rights above Church Street that would enable the construction of a controversial two-story pedestrian bridge connecting to Kennestone Hospital.

Residents of Church Street say the bridge clashes with their historic neighborhood lined with century-old homes and a new emergency department would create a traffic nightmare in their community.

Morris represents the ward that includes the hospital and the surrounding neighborhoods on the City Council. Homeowners in attendance at Wednesday’s meeting let out a series of gasps and hisses after Morris cast his lone objecting vote. Morris did not participate in discussion about the hospital’s request during the meeting and refused to comment following his vote.

It’s the second time the City Council has put off making a ruling. The issue was first tabled last month and received little discussion Monday from council members during a work session.

Residents of Church Street, whose homes are often highly sought after, have accused WellStar of purposely keeping them in the dark while planning Kennestone’s new emergency room, which is proposed to connect to the hospital’s existing surgery department by the bridge.

Many residents have said they support the growth of WellStar and recognize it is an important economic engine in Cobb, but they have argued growth shouldn’t happen at the expense of their neighborhoods.

WellStar has refuted claims it hasn’t actively sought the input of neighbors and has said its plans aren’t final.

What the hospital wants

Kennestone’s proposed expansion includes constructing a new two-story, 80,750-square-foot emergency department, parking deck and bridge across Church Street.

To build the bridge, WellStar needs City Council to grant an easement, but the city’s authority over the project ends there. The proposed site is owned by the Cobb County Kennestone Hospital Authority, a government entity exempt from city zoning

regulations. Though it’s exempted from taxes and zoning rules, the authority has voluntarily subjected itself to zoning in the past.

Before Wednesday’s vote to table the bridge request, Leo Reichert, attorney for WellStar, said postponing making a decision would “slow down a project we need to get to.”

He told the City Council the emergency department must be located on the proposed site and acknowledged there may be little room to compromise.

“We’re not ever going to convince, I don’t think, the folks that live there that’s the place it’s got to go,” Reichert said.

It’s the best location, he said, to get critical patients into surgery quickly in situations when seconds could mean life or death.

“That bridge goes right into the central core of the hospital, right into surgery, right into neuro intervention, right into cardiac intervention,” Reichert said.

Dan Woods, president of Kennestone, admitted communication between the hospital and residents could have been better in the past.

Still, he contended his request is to “begin conversations, not end conversations” and residents will be involved in designs.

“I personally believe that the bridge, with the input of residents, could be a marquee for the city of Marietta and welcome people into the city of Marietta,” Woods said.

Council doubtful of compromise

Though they voted to give WellStar more time to come to terms with the concerns of its neighbors, many council members said Wednesday they don’t think a compromise will be struck.

“The need for the bridge and the reality of the bridge is coming,” said Councilman Stuart Fleming. “The question is how to make it the best bridge for the city of Marietta.”

Fleming said he fears the community will be in the same stalemate next month when City Council takes the issue up again.

Councilman Philip Goldstein also said it’s unlikely the two parties will reach a deal because many residents aren’t just opposed to the construction of the pedestrian bridge. They’re also against building the emergency department at the proposed location between Church, Cherry and Cherokee streets.

“The hospital has the right to build there, and I’m not comfortable with saying, ‘I’m going to hold the ER hostage, or you can’t build there or you have to make other commitments,’” Goldstein said.

Public meetings have been held, but little progress has been made in reaching an agreement between the hospital and homeowners, said Councilwoman Michelle Cooper Kelly. She wants to see the parties develop an action plan outlining how to amicably move forward and present it to City Council next month.

Questions have been asked by residents, Councilman Grif Chalfant said, that have yet to be answered.

Chalfant said his own question about the feasibility of building an underground tunnel rather than a pedestrian bridge has yet to be addressed. After raising the issue, Chalfant was told by hospital officials at the meeting a tunnel would take too long to transport patients from the emergency department to the surgery wing and would cost 50 percent more.

Mayor Steve Tumlin said he will conduct another public meeting to give another opportunity for differences in opinions to be overcome. It will be his second town hall on the subject.

“There are a lot of people involved, and I think we need to have a central place to bring ideas together,” Tumlin said.

Councilman Johnny Walker agreed residents should have input.

“Kennestone Hospital is the heartbeat of our city,” Walker said. “I support the hospital. I support the ER. And I support the bridge. But I support the homeowners who live around there.”

Residents have their say

Four opponents stepped up to the lectern at Wednesday’s meetings to encourage City Council to call a time out.

One of those was Steve Imler, who lives on Church Street.

“The problem is that we have a great health care system that by its success creates a threat, a permanent threat, to our homes,” Imler said.

City Council should use WellStar’s easement request as an opportunity to give the health system what it needs but require stipulations that protect the neighborhood, he said.

Fellow Church Street resident Patty Pearlberg said she doesn’t have the same protection that residents who are governed by homeowners associations have. Her home was built before homeowners’ covenants were commonplace.

So she said she is relying on City Council to protect her home.

“The moment they mentioned moving this facility to the triangle (between Church, Cherokee and Cherry streets), the citizens and the committee vehemently opposed it,” Pearlberg said.

Jim Morris, who lives on Frayer Drive, was “very much in a panic” after learning of WellStar’s plan.

He’s concerned about the plan to place the hospital’s helipad on top of the new emergency department, which he says will cause motorists to be “eyeball to eyeball while they are expected to drive” along Church Street.

“Of all the things we have talked about over the last month, that’s the best example of how horribly thought out this scheme is,” Morris said.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
April 10, 2014
The OM's are at it again.
Be Careful
April 10, 2014
The residents of that neighborhood are being silly. That HUGE hospital campus already takes up TONS of space, with buildings, parking garages and there is already one bridge. The historic neighborhood doesn't start until a block past the hospital. The WHOLE area around that Church Street, Hwy 5 intersection is "industrial" already. The land they want to build on is already industrial. Knocking down existing buildings and replacing it with another doesn't make any difference. In fact, a new buildling would probably look BETTER than what's there now.

They are not proposing knocking down any historic buildings, or building into the historic area.

Traffic? That's a laugh. Been there lately? Traffic is ALREADY a nightmare. Hopefully it would get better if cars and ambulances had easier access to a better planned emergency area.
Bruce Hamilton
April 10, 2014
I feel much safer knowing that Kennestone Hospital is only a few blocks from my home on the near west side. That being said, I don't want it any closer to my home, nor do I want to see it cast a larger shadow on my friends' homes in the Church / Cherokee area. The reason for the bridge is clear to me. Land is cheaper to the east and south of the hospital than the industrial / commercial property to the north. In 10 years, Kennestone will occupy twice the footprint that it does now. We need to encourage the hospital to expand northward without choking off a beautiful and economically vital gateway to I-75.
April 10, 2014
These people are never going to be satisfied. They raised a fuss a few years ago when the hospital built new private rooms in the middle of its own property, and demanded that the hospital draw up a plan so they would know what the hospital wanted to do in the future.

The hospital gave them a plan, and now they say they don't like it, and didn't know anything about it.

Is it really going to make any difference if the hospital moves it's emergency room one block away in an area already surrounded by office buildings?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides