Charter passage won’t ‘move needle’ for most students
by Brett Bittner
Columnist
October 17, 2012 02:10 AM | 3628 views | 4 4 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Choice. It is a beautiful thing. We choose which car to buy, what shirt to wear, or which cereal will be swimming in milk for breakfast.

This election cycle, Georgia voters will decide whether we amend our state Constitution to allow the state to authorize and fund “special schools” that are not approved by the elected school boards serving local communities.

Unfortunately, most voters will not delve into the language of the authorizing resolution or discuss with legislators the intent of the amendment they voted for or against. They will listen to the “Yes” and “No” campaigns’ talking points, which seem to frame the question as being either in favor of charter schools or against them.

The results from many charter schools are outstanding. I think that they can be very innovative and an alternative for those who are able to attend them. These schools’ students excel because the charter petition seeks to waive many of the mandates and minimize bureaucracy. The same can be said of tuition-based school students and students who receive their education at home, who also excel without the hindrances preventing the same excellence in government-run schools. Am I the only one seeing a pattern here?

To me, the question becomes why limit our students’ potential to those who attend the “special schools” authorized by the amendment? If charter schools are the panacea to our woeful education results, where is the burning desire to waive the mandates, bureaucracy, and administration at every school for every child? Why not work to relieve our schools, teachers and communities of the burdens imposed by those who think that we can achieve by aiming to have each child taught in the same “one size fits all” manner?

Year after year, new regulations and mandates come from Washington and Atlanta regarding how local communities educate their children. These mandates come in two forms: unfunded mandates that restrict a local community’s ability to adopt an educational standard they accept, or additional funding tied to the local system undertaking certain activities. If now is the time to amend the state Constitution regarding education, why was this amendment the only option being considered? Perhaps we should have an honest and comprehensive discussion about education before we amend the state Constitution to serve a very small population.

As written, the amendment authorizes a new state-level body of unelected, unaccountable appointees. Perhaps it is a mistrust of government that tells me that those appointed are “paid back” for whatever favors they provided the elected official who appoints them, regardless of whether at the federal, state or local level. Unfortunately, the amendment appears to be another move to centralize educational decision-making at a level further away from those affected. I do not believe in top-down solutions for local priorities.

At the local level, voters elect the school board members. A voter’s choice at the ballot box is an endorsement of the actions that elected board member takes for the duration of his or her term. Poor representation can be remedied by the voters at the next election or through a recall petition. In fact, I welcome an engaged community concerned about the education and direction of our community.

As an individual and a Libertarian, I think that more choices are better than fewer choices. This amendment’s passage will not move the needle for Georgia’s education statistics. That will only happen when engaged parents and active communities demand a real choice about education and real, in the home, local control over their children’s education needs.

When it comes to this November’s ballot question regarding charter schools however, we can only choose between two, yes or no. I’m voting no.

Brett Bittner represents Ward 1 on the Marietta school board. He previously served on the Marietta Historic Board of Review and Historic Preservation Commission. This column reflects his personal opinion, not necessarily that of the school board.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Voice of Reason
|
October 24, 2012
First, we have to pass the Constitutional Amendment before we realize what's in it!

And we will realize what's in it once we get official Charter Schools academically outperforming the #CCSD/teacher union controlled, nicely landscaped and groomed, American Idol Preparatory auditoriums, & Astro turf sport enthusiast schools, we may actually get a little student performance gains by showing the charter schools do it better with 40-60% of the same expenses as Government schools.
SA Rogers
|
November 02, 2012
Pass an amendment to the Constitution before we know what's in it? As my grandmother used to say, "not on your tintype". Especially when what's in that amendment, as closely as I can figure it out, already exists with boards we can vote in (as opposed to the non-elected board in this amendment) and the created side-by-side educational systems instead of fixing the one already in existence. What we will have is two almost identical one-size-fits-all school systems instead of (if we are really going to go the two school system route) one bettered "regular" school system and one "square peg, round hole" school system. Not all kids learn the same way. Those kids are not being served any better by this - just in a different building the same way.
Shane Coley
|
October 20, 2012
I like Brett Bittner, he is a friend, but disagree on this point. We can't have a knee jerk reaction to the idea of centralized decision making. Based on the actual history of public charter schools, this amendment effectively decentralizes power at the point where it is being exercised in opposition to individual liberty, because it puts the choice more firmly in the hands of local people who want to decide more about how their children are educated. The local I am interested in is the home; the parents and the children. One only has to look at what Gwinnett county BOC has done with Ivy Prep, as compared to what the appeals board has done with Ivy Prep, to see that the amendment will result in increased individual liberty, and more higher quality schools, at a lower cost.

Of course the best thing would be to get government out of education altogether, but we don't get to vote on that in November or when we elect BOC members.
MCBarber
|
October 22, 2012
I'd say that since the counties are against it 'cuz they don't want to lose funding, the state can order them to allow charter schools to be set up. That strikes me as a good thing since the school board cares more about what the bureaucracy of administration and teachers unions think than for what would actually improve the education of the students of that county/municipality.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides