Bill would put teeth in existing immigration law
by Jon Gillooly
jgillooly@mdjonline.com
January 22, 2011 12:00 AM | 2475 views | 17 17 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EAST COBB - State Sen. Judson Hill (R-east Cobb) wants to put teeth in an existing law designed to keep public employers from hiring illegal immigrants.

"The bill's intent is to help employ Georgians by ensuring that only American citizens are hired on any public works projects, such as constructing roads and government buildings," Hill said. "When taxpayers' money is used to develop government projects, then I believe that the contractors we hire must be required to show that they only employ people who are here lawfully."

Immigration reform activist D.A. King of Marietta, a supporter of the bill, said it was blocked last year by the lobbying firms that represent the city and county governments of Georgia, known as the Georgia Municipal Association and Association of County Commissioners of Georgia.

"We expect it to pass with little effective resistance this year, but also expect ACCG/GMA to oppose it unless they can gut it. Then their habit is to say publicly they supported it all along," King said.

The bill addresses a law originally created by Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock) in 2006, which requires any local government or official state agency to make sure they're not hiring illegal aliens by using a screening system called E-Verify to determine their citizenship or immigration status.

Roger's law also requires any firm contracting with public agencies to use E-Verify. Before the contractor is allowed to bid on a contract, they have to first sign a sworn affidavit pledging their use of the E-Verify system.

But after the law passed, it was found in some cases that after winning the government bid, the contractor would stop using E-Verify or simply lie on the affidavit, King said.

"We have found contractors sign the affidavit who have never heard of E-verity. That happens. We know that there are contractors who have falsely sworn on the affidavit," King said.

Hill's bill addresses this aspect by placing penalties on local governments or official agencies that are in violation regarding the use of E-Verify by impeding their ability to get state funding.

"It's put a degree of difficultly for cheating in there," King said.

The bill would require all potential public works contractors to have used E-Verify for at least six months in mid-2011, then twelve months in 2012, in an effort to create a pool of contractors with constant use of E-Verify so as to stop contractors from dropping E-Verify after winning a bid. King said E-Verify use is voluntary under federal law except for most federal contractors.
Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
mmmmmm
|
January 25, 2011
We need to make it all construction contracts, and that in order to obtain a building permit and inspections, the contractor and all tiers of subcontractors must use e-verify. We must do something about all of the residential construction being outsourced to illegals. We can't just do this for Government Contracts. We need to do it for all work.
The Mic
|
January 25, 2011
The reason we don't enforce immigration, is that most of our elected officials DO NOT represent their constituents. We need more politicians like Chip Rogers, he represents his district well. That's right, if Chip Rogers were president, we'd have a legal president, oh yeah.... that's right, if the president were a legal citizen we might be able to enforce immigration.
Mike R.
|
January 25, 2011
mr king, could you also do "sworn on the affidavits" on welfare, section 8, food stamps, electricity and gas grants recepients.
Truth Is Real
|
January 25, 2011
The poster "Truth Hurts" might want to go back to school and get the free education that is offered to him. "There are to many people" means such as "I am sending this letter to many people." Please, Truth Hurts, do get the second-grade education that is offered to you as well as immigrants and learn that when you are talking about more than a great number of people it is "too many" such as "There are too many." But I guess grade school doesn't allow chewing tobacco.
Harrison22
|
January 24, 2011
What kind of dental work will be offered?
mk - had enough!!
|
January 24, 2011
South Carolina has it right!

Look up - South Carolina Labor, Licensing & Regulation website.(SCLLR) Left column,... brouse through law, audits, etc.

Click on (EMPLOYERS CITED)-

you can then brouse lists (by the year & months), of PUBLIC & PRIVATE employers fined for employing illegals & the status of company. Some of the fines have been quite substancial.

There is also a form you can fill out to report a company you suspect is employing illegal aliens.

South Carolina started ENFORCING their Illegal Immigration Reform Act back in 2008!!

Compare Georgia & South Carolina & you will see that Georgia is PRO illegal!!
Pat H
|
January 23, 2011
The legislators know that the building authority hire illegals to clean their offices and yet there is no penalty defined for noncompliance with this law?

The governments will continue to hire contractors who use subcontractors to hire illegals and continue to do so without any penalties.

We are sick of this behavior. How about any illegal caught working on any state project to be subject to immediate deportation, along with his or her family?
D. Gatch reply:
|
January 22, 2011
Good idea, but that was done last year - you don't know because much of the liberal press refuses to do stories on immigration bills.

THANK YOU MDJ for this!
ATF
|
January 22, 2011
The article indicates penalties on local governments if they don't use E-verify, but there don't seem to be enough penalties on contractors. Cobb did a good job in finding that sub-contractor who was not using E-verify on the new court buildings, but his only penalty was he dropped the contract.

Shouldn't there be a fine - of something like $100 per day for every day an illegal was working on a job when the contractor/sub-contractor didn't use E-verify? If there are no penalties, there is no deterent. Still, Hill is moving in the right direction.
okpeople
|
January 22, 2011
Apply it to welfare next.
Devlin Adams
|
January 22, 2011
I propose to fine the offending subcontrator $ 1,000.00 for each employee not E-Verfied. Further

the General Contractor who employed the subcontractor would receive the same fine as the subcontractor. For second offenses by the same subcontactor, the fines are doubled. For second offenses on the same job, the fine is tripled. If you hit the subcontractors and the General Contractors in the pocket book, that is gonna produce the quickest results. It will no longer be cheaper to hire illegals. I'll bet, if that were law right now, that a raid on the new East Valley Elementary, in Marietta, would net a miniumum $ 50,000.00 fine the first day.
belugajedi
|
January 22, 2011
How about a lifetime bar to any state contract - no waivers - if they lie or fail to use e-verify? Regardless of who in the company fails to do their duty and complete the checks....
truth hurts
|
January 22, 2011
Stop all immigration! There are to many people here now.
izors
|
January 22, 2011
It astonds me that the same government entities that are quick to enforce traffic laws, that provide them with revenue, are so reluctant to enforce immigration laws. Do they not realize that this action simply erodes confidence in them and the very governments that they say they want us to respect.
Craziness
|
January 22, 2011
Wasted effort here. The corporate megagods will squash this bill like a bug. And even if it is passed, no one will enforce it.
D. Gatch
|
January 22, 2011
Lets go one step further, if an employer/contractor is found to have lied, falsified and in anyway circumvented the law, that they lose or suspend the contracting license for 6 months to 1 year for "each" offense. Also it would help if jail time was added for the more serious (habitual) violators. Put real teeth into the law and stop wimping out on this issue.
Robert Valdez
|
January 22, 2011
Great idea, about time somebody besides Chip Rogers steps up. It sounds like Mr. King knows a lot about this bill. That can only help Senator Hill. ILLEGALS, GET OUT!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides