Besotted with youth — Sensuality reigns
by Roger Hines
Columnist
February 23, 2013 11:52 PM | 1622 views | 3 3 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Whoever said it’s better to light a candle than to curse the darkness was correct; however, when lovers of darkness keep snuffing out the candles, the best one can do is cry out, hoping someone will hear.

Two thinkers who continue to cry out are sociologist Judith Reisman and columnist George Will. For years, Reisman, whom the mainstream media enjoys ignoring, has written books and delivered speeches challenging the ongoing sexualization of America’s children and youth.

Currently a Visiting Professor at Liberty University School of Law, Reisman has been a frequent lecturer at Princeton, Notre Dame, Georgetown and other institutions. Pornography’s worst enemy, this lady, a 78-year-old scholar, has since the late 1970s focused on exposing the fraudulent research of “sexologist” Alfred Kinsey.

Though Will has not explored the topic as much as Reisman, he apparently sees the need to address it. Recently Will wrote, “The economic impact of teen sexuality is futuristic,” meaning that bad teen sexual behavior leads to a tough economic life for teens as well as for their parents, who wind up raising their children’s children.

Compared to the research and writing that Reisman and Will have produced, what I know about the statistics of the matter might fill a thimble. What I do know, however, is the countenance of beautiful high school and college girls whose co-habitant/impreg-nators just skipped town. That’s what many 21- to 25-year-old co-habitant/im-pregnators do when they learn that their 17 to 19-year-old live-in girl friend is pregnant.

“But Mr. Hines, he said he loved me, and he’s really from a good family. Why did he bolt?” I stand there, not knowing what to say and knowing it’s not wise to say much anyhow. I didn’t ask the girl for this information. She volunteered it at the end of the school day. So I listen once again to another pregnant single girl’s story and end the conversation by wishing her well.

Not to quibble with Reisman and Will’s words, but the more precise term for what we face isn’t sexualization, but sensualization. Do American parents realize that both their children and teens are being sensualized beyond belief and that it produces certain results? Remember when children were allowed to be children? Well, no more. The world of entertainment is making sure of that.

Of course many parents are culpable also. Because of the mystique we have built around teens and children, many parents are literally afraid of their offspring: afraid to communicate, or set some rules for television and the Internet, or worse still, afraid their child will be out of step with the prevailing culture.

This fear has led many parents to acquiesce to the new normal of modern culture which edifies, for instance, the slithering sensuality of Beyonce.

Yes, we now have the beautiful Beyonce, with the most beautiful of voices, strutting half nude (make that three-quarters) on every screen we turn to, and it’s all OK.

This is no attack on her. From all reports Beyonce has trained all of her young life to achieve her goals. In this manner, she is exemplary; however, she still is one of many entertainers who have moved music and dance from an art form to a vent for juvenile emotions and passions. Forget the mind, character, virtue and such. Just get with the music and “the moves.”

Why have Americans come to believe that utter sensuality is harmless? It’s probably because sensuality, like gluttony, is a matter of degree. Eating is both a necessity and a sensual pleasure of life, but uncontrolled eating … you know the rest. The five senses are also pleasures of life, but it is definitely possible to give ourselves over to them, producing a sensate self and ultimately a sensate society. Music must be loud, wardrobe must be bold and “the moves” must be hot. And crotch to crotch dancing? Why, what’s wrong with that?

Today children and youth are not only feared but also worshipped. We imbue them with an aura that would shock our grandparents. Failing to understand music’s power, we give them no direction in the development of musical tastes. Yielding to what Cicero called “the tyranny of the present,” we allow them to believe that all things contemporary are OK.

The result?

Aroused boys and beautiful, tearful girls with a tough future.

Years ago after the Beatles’ Paul McCartney debuted his Liverpool Oratorio in Carnegie Hall, an interviewer told him that his music sounded more like Handel’s “Messiah” than Beatles’ music. McCartney replied, “You can’t be a teenager forever.” As they say, there we have it.

Reisman and Will are voices crying in the wilderness. They need our help, especially if we have children, grandchildren, nieces or nephews.

Roger Hines of Kennesaw is a retired high school teacher and former state legislator.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Kevin Foley
|
February 27, 2013
Roger, you said it yourself. Parents don't communicate with their kids. I couldn't agree more.

I'm not an educator but I did spend some time in public school and recall the snickers in biology class when the teacher said sperm. Sex ed is like any other course. You have some kids learning or at least trying and some who will never learn anything.

Isn't the goal is to reach those who want to learn, reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, and in the process reduce the number of STDs and abortions? You'll never reduce the number to zero, but you can get the number down. This is why I cannot understand why some conservatives and evangelicals fight sex ed tooth and nail.

Start teaching sex ed in 7th grade and continue from there.
Kevin Foley
|
February 24, 2013
Roger, we agree. You just made a very strong case for sex education starting in middle school: "many parents are literally afraid of their offspring: afraid to communicate."

Exactly. Parents can't or wont candidly discuss sex and its unintended consequences with their kids. You suggest this is a new problem. Unwanted pregnancies and STDs have been around as long as humans.

Does contemporary entertainment push kids to experiment sexually? Probably. All the more reason to make sure kids are thoroughly educated about sex, know the consequences of reckless behavior, and encouraged to abstain or use birth control.

Roger Hines
|
February 24, 2013
Kevin, we gotta talk. We gotta meet first. Let's do, and you pick the time, place, and weapon (just kidding about that one). What a twist you have put on my article. You don't think we're up to our ears in sex ed already? High schoolers snicker at sex ed. They know it already. It isn't helping and is probably making things worse.

Always,

Roger
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides