Marietta may fund its own health clinic
by Jon Gillooly
jgillooly@mdjonline.com
August 29, 2010 12:00 AM | 3874 views | 17 17 comments | 23 23 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - The City of Marietta is moving to open a health clinic for its employees and their dependents, and believes it will save the city money in the long-run. Employees and their dependents would be able to use the clinic for no out-of-pocket fees.

A vote is scheduled for the Sept. 15 council meeting.

If approved, the city would lease about 1,200 square feet somewhere downtown to house a couple of exams rooms, which would be staffed and maintained by local physicians hired by a Brentwood, Tenn., firm Care Here.

City Manager Bill Bruton said the clinic is a way to reduce rising health care costs brought about by President Obama's new health care legislation.

With the clinic, the city would see a 4 percent increase in its health insurance bill or about $300,000. Without the clinic, the cost rises about 8 percent or $600,000. The city's health insurance bill was $8,292,447 for fiscal year 2010 and is budgeted at $8,623,736 for fiscal year 2011 with the clinic or $8,955,052 without the clinic, he said.

The city, which is self- insured, uses insurance provider Blue Cross Blue Shield.

Marietta's existing health insurance plan spans the current calendar year. The proposed plan would end when the council's term expires on Dec. 31, 2012.

The clinic would not cause the city's 760 employees and their dependents to see an increase in cost.

Bruton explains how this is possible.

"The cost per visit at the clinic is less than the cost at an office outside the clinic," Bruton said. "One way that this is accomplished is through the elimination of the paperwork that regular offices have to file to get paid. They have to spend a lot of time and money submitting the required paperwork to get paid by insurance companies, individuals and the federal government. With the clinic, they eliminate much of that paperwork and the medical staff is able to spend more time with patients, so the cost per patient visit decreases."

The clinic would serve a total of 2,199 people who may use the clinic anytime they want for as many times as they want during clinic hours, which have yet to be determined.

Employees pay a $25 co-payment when visiting their family doctor. And they can continue to see their family doctor under the new plan, they just get the option of visiting the clinic, at no cost to them, as well.

Bruton estimates a $3 million savings to the city over the next three years with the clinic. One of the benefits of the program is that the same day employees are injured or sick, they can visit the clinic, returning to work in as little as 30 minutes. So the clinic should cut down on sick time.

"It is a combination of savings we will experience in various areas: office visit fees, workers' comp costs, pre-employment physical costs, and drug testing costs," he said. "The amount of savings increases over time as regular insurance rates increase each year and we are able to avoid substantial portions of those increases as our clinic usage increases."

The Care Here firm scored highest among seven firms that responded to the city's Request for Proposals with We Care TLC and Concentra Health Service scoring in second and third places.

Other cities that use such clinics include Monroe, Gainesville and Chattanooga, Bruton said.

Mayor Steve Tumlin, who has kept an eye on the proposal as it has worked its way through the RFP process, said he supports the idea.

"The fact that there was six or seven other vendors out there that already have experience in it just shows that it's something that's evolving already, that's come among us," Tumlin said.

Councilman Johnny Sinclair said he wants to learn more before voting.

"I always get nervous when people say they're going to save $3 million over three years, but the (staff) that did this is a bunch of people that I think are top notch. I mean, they know what they're talking about," Sinclair said.

Councilman Philip Goldstein said before any contract is signed, he wants to make sure a clause is inserted allowing the city to cancel the agreement with Care Here in the event Obama's healthcare legislation is struck down in the court system.
Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Cobb Guy
|
August 30, 2010
Behold the FUTURE !! A way to avoid the new healthcare rules for government employees. They truly do take care of their own. Ordinary people will pay more and then stand in line, as was noted in a prior comment. Just the beginning....
pardon me
|
August 29, 2010
Pardon me, but is this decision going to be made by the same people who rushed out to "protect the congregation" of the mosque out on Powder Springs Street? If so, the voters better get worried.
an antwort
|
August 29, 2010
To jr874587: they will use it if they have to choose between it being free or them paying a copay. This is going to happen all over the country; it started in England last year. State and municipal governments are going to opt out of ObamaCare big time! Only the work-a-day people are going to have to wait in line for treatment with illegals and homeless. Government takes care of its own.
marietta1987
|
August 29, 2010
Now this is real Government Health care.
Watcher...
|
August 29, 2010
This is a perfect example of Governments and Bureaurcats overextending their reach!

I want Governments to shrink, not grow.
The Man
|
August 29, 2010
I guess you didnt get the MEMO!, in which it stated you can continue to see your regular doctor if you choose too, and if and outside company can do a better job than a company in Georgia,then why let an incompetent company in the state do it,if the 1 out of state faired better?,just because there based here??!! WOW! so were you so percise and dice with the Obama plan?, I wonder!,and if the bases of YOUR!skeptism is just cause some want leave there primary doctor, well that seems pretty weak to me. You do know if there cost goes up thru Obama Care, those you speak of will eventually leave the GREAT PLAN!, in which you(seem)to endorse,and change over to the city run plan?,you have considered that in your thought pattern of logic right?
GreatIdea!
|
August 29, 2010
I think this is a great idea. I would move my family's care there.
1ofmany
|
August 29, 2010
Sick employees can return to work in as little as 30 minutes? If you're sick you should go to the doctor & then go home so you don't make everyone else sick not return to the office.
just mel
|
August 29, 2010
as one person who has used a company like you have selected, only for mandatory drug test, knows the hateful and overworked attitude of these places. And the lack of real doctoring. Makes me think of the original HMO's before all the lawsuits made them what they are now. Tax payers, do your homework before your elected official makes a decision for you.
Pat H
|
August 29, 2010
The Mayor and Council and their families should be required to use this clinic, regardless of whether they have health care insurance elsewhere.
anonymous
|
August 29, 2010
This sounds good, BUT anytime any government says they can save money, BEWARE. Intentions, Im sure, are the best, but OBAMACARE was supposed to save money also. Every page of the bill seems to uncover more costs. Proceed carefully.

In the Wilderness
|
August 29, 2010
I disagree and think it will take awhile, but the advantage of not paying a copay, minor workers comp claims being directed there and ease of use will catch on. Men in particular generally don't form close associations w/ aprticular physicians. That is a woman thing so the women may not be lining up, but your kids w/ a runny nose,easy access and no copay sounds like a winning combination to me.
Is it true
|
August 29, 2010
As I researched the company profile, it was interesting to see CARE HERE's management. While you may see dieticians, doctors, RN's, Pharmacists, and others, it seems as if one critical and important profession in health care is left out. That is Nurse Practitioners. When any decision or discussion centers on health care, NP's seem to be left out of the equation. They are the primary care providers due to the fact that only 20% of physicians specialize in family medicine. NP's go where physicians do not meaning small rural towns. Again, I do not know or have the stats of how many NP's are employed if any, but looking at the management, they are not listed.
tb4321
|
August 29, 2010
Agree with jr874567, that savings may be based on people actually using the clinic. That may be a safe bet if the savings are predicated on the Health Improvement Act, because the only additional cost imposed there is that more people are covered. So these may be currently uninsureds being added that don't have regular doctors or are using other subsidized clinics.
anonymous
|
August 29, 2010
THE WAY TO REDUCE RISING HEAITH CARE COSTS IS TO DO AWAY WITH IT. A LOT OF COMPANYS HAVE DONE AWAY WITH THAT AND RETIRERMENT. I THINK ITS ABOUT TIME THE TAX PAYERS START GETTING OUR MONEYS WORTH..$9,000,000 A YEAR FOR INSURANCE AND ABOUT $26,000,000 FOR RETIRERMENT....JUST HAVE TO TIGHTEN YOUR BELT A LITTLE MORE...LETS FACE IT, MARIETTA HAS LOST MONEY AT EVERY THING THEY TOUCH

givemeliberty
|
August 29, 2010
Do the math. There is NO WAY a clinic will be operated for $300k per year. Salaries, benefits, rent and utilities, not to mention malpractice insurance, add up to much more than that! Just doesn't pass the smell test. Watch out taxpayers, this is a "conference center boondoggle like project" waiting to happen. The city will enter into some contract it can't get out of and the company providing the service will milk it for all it's worth and more!
jr874567
|
August 29, 2010
the assumption is that employees will actually use the clinic. People with relationships with their primary care doctor won't change. Skeptical employees won't visit the "company" clinic. So I doubt if there wil be any significant savings when you consider the fees to maintain the clinic. Also, you really should have used a

Georgia company!
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.